Large-scale science education intervention research we can use

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 281-304

  Penuel, William R ^a   Fishman, Barry J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

evaluation and theory; implementation; policy; science education; standards

Indexed keywords

COHERENT SYSTEM; EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS; EVALUATION AND THEORY; IMPLEMENTATION; INTERVENTION RESEARCH; SCALING-UP; SCIENCE EDUCATION; SCIENCE LEARNING; SCIENCE TEACHING;

EDUCATION; INNOVATION; PUBLIC POLICY; STANDARDS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84856702087     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.21001     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. Aguiar, O. G., Mortimer, E., &, Scott, P., (2010). Learning from and responding to students' questions: The authoritative and dialogic tension. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (2), 174-193.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Ares, N., (2010). Political and cultural dimensions of organizing learning around funds of knowledge. In W. R. Penuel & K. O'Connor (Eds). Learning research as a human science. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, 109 (1), 192-206.
4. Ballenger, C., (2009). Puzzling moments, teachable moments: Practicing teacher research in urban classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
5. Bang, M., &, Medin, D., (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94 (6), 1008-1026.
6. Bang, M., Medin, D., &, Atran, S., (2007). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104 (35), 13868-13874. (Pubitemid 350003309)
7. Barton, A. C., &, Tan, E., (2009). Funds of knowledge, discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (1), 50-73.
8. Bessell, A. G., Burke, M. C., Plaza, M. P., Lee, O., &, Schumm, J. S., (2010). The educational reform rating rubric: Example of a new tool for evaluating complex school reform initiatives. Field Methods, 20 (3), 283-295.
9. Beyer, H., &, Holtzblatt, K., (1997). Contextual design: A customer-centered approach to systems designs. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
10. Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., &, Soloway, E., (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35 (3), 149-164.
11. Borman, G. D., Gamoran, A., &, Bowdon, J., (2008). A randomized trial of teacher development in elementary science: First-year achievement effects. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1 (3), 237-264.
12. Bryk, A.S., (2009). Support a science of performance improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 90 (8), 597-600.
13. Bryk, A. S., &, Gomez, L. M., (2008). Reinventing a research and development capacity. In, F. M. Hess, (Ed.), The future of educational entrepreneurship: Possibilities for school reform (pp. 181-187). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
14. Buckley, B. C., Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R. F., Gerlitz, B., &, Willett, J., (2004). Model-based teaching and learning with BioLogicaTM: What do they learn? How do they learn? How do we know? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13 (1), 23-41.
15. Carlone, H. B., (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls' access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (4), 392-414.
16. Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., &, Webb, A., (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48 (5), 459-485.
17. Chin, C., &, Osborne, J., (2010). Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (7), 883-908.
18. Cobb, P. A., Confrey, J., diSessa, A. A., Lehrer, R., &, Schauble, L., (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 9-13. (Pubitemid 36209336)
19. Cochrane Collaboration. (2005). Continuing education meetings and workshops: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane review). Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 21 (3), 187-188.
20. Cohen, D. K., &, Hill, H. C., (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Confrey, J., Castro-Filho, J., &, Wilhelm, J., (2000). Implementation research as a means to link systemic reform and applied psychology in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 35 (3), 179-191.
22. Cooper, C. R., Denner, J., &, Lopez, E. M., (1999). Cultural brokers: Helping Latino children on pathways toward success. The Future of Children, 9, 51-57. (Pubitemid 30414092)
23. Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., &, Rogat, A., (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. CPRE Research Report # RR-63. New York, NY: Center on Continuous Instructional Improvement, Teachers College, Columbia University.
24. Cordray, D. S., &, Pion, G. M., (2006). Treatment strength and integrity: Models and methods. In, R. R. Bootzin, &, P. E. McKnight, (Eds.), Strengthening research methodology: Psychological measurement and evaluation (pp. 103-124). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., &, Birman, B. F., (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers' instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24 (2), 81-112.
26. Donovan, S., Wigdor, A. K., &, Snow, C. E., (2003). Strategic education research partnership. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
27. Drake, C., &, Sherin, M. G., (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36 (2), 153-187. (Pubitemid 43842274)
28. Dynarski, M., (2008). Bringing answers to educators: Guiding principles for research syntheses. Educational Researcher, 37 (1), 27-29.
29. Fishman, B. J., &, Krajcik, J., (2003). What does it mean to create sustainable science curriculum innovations? A commentary. Science Education, 87 (4), 564-573.
30. Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., &, Tal, R., (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19 (6), 643-658. (Pubitemid 36977243)
31. Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., &, Ji, P., (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness, and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6 (3), 151-175. (Pubitemid 43487950)
32. Gallas, K., (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press.
33. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L. M., Birman, B. F., &, Yoon, K. S., (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (4), 915-945. (Pubitemid 33590046)
34. Gee, J. P., (2004). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In, E. W. Saul, (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 10-32). Newark, DE: International Reading Association, Inc.
35. Gee, J. P., &, Clinton, K., (2000). An African American child's 'science talk': Co-construction of meaning from the perspective of multiple Discourses. In, M. Gallego, &, S. Hollingsworth, (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 118-135). New York: Teachers College Press.
36. Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J., Fishman, B. J., &, Soloway, E., (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (8), 922-939.
37. Gerard, L., Bowyer, J., &, Marx, R., (2008). A community of principals: Building school leadership for scaling technology-science curriculum reform. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
38. Gorden, V. S., &, Bieman, J. M., (1995). Rapid prototyping: Lessons learned. IEEE Software, 12 (1), 85-95.
39. Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-Lopez, P., &, Tejada, C., (2000). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6 (4), 286-303.
40. Gutiérrez, K. D., &, Orellana, M., (2006). The problem of English learners: Constructing genres of difference. Research in the Teaching of English, 40 (4), 502-507. (Pubitemid 44010807)
41. Gutiérrez, K. D., &, Rogoff, B., (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32 (5), 19-25. (Pubitemid 36996457)
42. Gutiérrez, K. D., &, Vossoughi, S., (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61 (1-2), 100-117.
43. Halliday, M. A. K., &, Martin, J., (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.
44. Halverson, R., Feinstein, N., &, Meshoulam, D., (2011). School leadership for science education. In, G. E. DeBoer, (Ed.), The role of public policy in K-12 science education (pp. 397-430). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
45. Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., &, Shanahan, M.-C., (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (8), 978-1003.
46. Herrenkohl, L. R., &, Mertl, V., (2010). How students come to be, know, and do: A case for a broad view of learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
47. Honig, M. I., &, Hatch, T. C., (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33 (8), 16-30. (Pubitemid 40067302)
48. Horn, I. S., (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics community. Teachers College Record, 112 (1), 225-259.
49. Horn, I. S., &, Little, J. W., (2010). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers' workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47 (1), 181-217.
50. Hsi, S., Sabelli, N., Krajcik, J., Tinker, R. F., &, Ellenbogen, K., (2006). Learning at the nanoscale: Research questions that the rapidly evolving interdisciplinarity of science poses for the learning sciences. In, S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, &, D. T. Hickey, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 1066-1072). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Hudicourt-Barnes, J., (2003). The use of argumentation in Hatian Creole science classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 73 (1), 73-93. (Pubitemid 36470997)
52. Ingersoll, R. M., (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Education Research Journal, 38 (3), 499-534.
53. Jacob, B., (2007). The challenge of staffing urban schools with urban teachers. The Future of Children, 17 (1), 129-153. (Pubitemid 46743517)
54. Kelly, A. E., (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (1), 113-128.
55. Kelly, J. A., Somlai, A. M., DiFranceisco, W. J., Otto-Salaj, L. L., McAuliffe, T. L., Hackl, K. L., &, Rompa, D., (2000). Bridging the gap between the science and service of HIV prevention: Transferring effective research-based HIV prevention interventions to community AIDS service providers. American Journal of Public Health, 90 (7), 1082-1099.
56. Kesidou, S., &, Roseman, J. E., (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (6), 522-549.
57. Knapp, M. S., &, Plecki, M. L., (2001). Investing in the renewal of urban science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (10), 1089-1100. (Pubitemid 33655604)
58. Krajcik, J. S., McNeill, K. L., &, Reiser, B. J., (2008). Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Science Education, 92 (1), 1-32.
59. Latour, B., (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Lee, O., (2002). Science inquiry for elementary students from diverse backgrounds. In, W. G. Secada, (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 23-69). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
61. Lee, O., &, Luykx, A., (2005). Dilemmas in scaling up innovations in elementary science instruction with nonmainstream students. American Educational Research Journal, 42 (3), 411-438. (Pubitemid 41498206)
62. Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R., LeRoy, K., &, Secada, W. G., (2008). Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (1), 31-52. (Pubitemid 351189811)
63. Lemke, J. L., (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
64. Lieberman, A., (2000). Networks as learning communities: Shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 221-227.
65. Lieberman, A., &, Wood, D., (2002). Inside the National Writing Project: Connecting network learning and classroom teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
66. Lin, H.-T., &, Fishman, B. J., (2004). Supporting the scaling of innovations: Guiding teacher adaptation of materials by making implicit structures explicit. In, Y. B. Kafai, W. A. Sandoval, N. Enyedy, A. S. Nixon, &, F. Herrera, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 617). Santa Monica, CA: Erlbaum.
67. Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L., &, Hatano, G., (2005). Toward teachers' adaptive metacognition. Educational Psychologist, 40 (4), 245-255. (Pubitemid 43266593)
68. Lynch, S. J., Szesze, M., Pyke, C., &, Kuipers, J., (2007). Scaling up highly-rated science curriculum units for diverse student populations: Features that affect collaborative research and vice versa. In, B. Schneider, &, S-.K. McDonald, (Eds.), Scale-up in education: Issues in practice (Vol. II, pp. 91-122). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
69. Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R., Myers, N., Lee, O., &, Buxton, C. A., (2009). School and teacher predictors of science instruction practices with English language learners in urban elementary schools. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 15 (2), 93-118.
70. Martin, J. R., (1989). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. London: Oxford University Press.
71. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J., Fishman, B. J., Soloway, E., Geier, R., &, Revital, T. T., (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (10), 1063-1080. (Pubitemid 40002957)
72. Maull, K. E., Saldivar, M. G., Sumner, T., (2011 June). Understanding digital library adoption: A use diffusion approach. Paper presented at the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Ottawa, Canada.
73. McDonald, S.-K., Keesler, V. A., Kauffmann, N. J., &, Schneider, B., (2006). Scaling up exemplary interventions. Educational Researcher, 35 (3), 15-24.
74. McMunn, N., McColskey, W., &, Butler, S., (2004). Building teacher capacity in classroom assessment to improve student learning. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research, & Practice, 4 (4), 25-48.
75. Means, B., Confrey, J., House, A., &, Bhanot, R., (2008). STEM high schools: Specialized science, technology, engineering, and mathematics secondary schools in the United States. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
76. Millen, D. R., (2000). Rapid ethnography: Time deepening strategies for HCI field research. Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 280-286). New York, NY: ACM Press.
77. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
78. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
79. National Research Council. (2001). Classroom assessment and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
80. National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
81. National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
82. National Research Council. (2010). A framework for science education: Preliminary public draft. Washington, DC: Committee on Conceptual Framework for New Science Education Standards, Board on Science Education, National Research Council.
83. National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
84. Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., &, Bryk, A. S., (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23 (4), 297-321. (Pubitemid 33582689)
85. O'Connor, K., &, Allen, A-R., (2010). Learning as the organizing of social futures. In W. R. Penuel & K. O'Connor (Eds). Learning research as a human science. National Society for Studies in Education, 109 (1): 160-175.
86. O'Connor, K., &, Penuel, W. R., (2010). Introduction: Principles of a human sciences approach to research on learning. In W. R. Penuel & K. O'Connor, (Eds). Learning research as a human science. National Society for Studies in Education, 109 (1): 1-16.
87. O'Connor, M. C., &, Michaels, S., (1993). Aligning academic talk and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24 (4), 318-355.
88. O'Connor, M. C., &, Michaels, S., (2011). Problematizing dialogic and authoritative discourse, their coding in classroom transcripts, and realization in the classroom. Paper presented at the ISCAR Congress, Rome, Italy.
89. O'Donnell, C. L., (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78 (1), 33-84.
90. Oakes, J., (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
91. (2010). Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) for America's future. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
92. Pea, R. D., &, Collins, A., (2008). Learning how to do science education: Four waves of reform. In, Y. Kali, M. C. Linn, &, J. E. Roseman, (Eds.), Designing coherent science education (Vol. 3-12). New York: Teachers College Press.
93. Penuel, W. R., DeBarger, A. H., (2011). Supporting teacher learning to improve classroom assessment in science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
94. Penuel, W. R., &, Gallagher, L. P., (2009). Comparing three approaches to preparing teachers to teach for deep understanding in Earth science: Short-term impacts on teachers and teaching practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18 (4), 461-508.
95. Penuel, W. R., Gallagher, L. P., &, Moorthy, S., (2011). Preparing teachers to design sequences of instruction in Earth science: A comparison of three professional development programs. American Educational Research Journal, 48 (4), 996-1025.
96. Penuel, W. R., McWilliams, H., McAuliffe, C., Benbow, A., Mably, C., &, Hayden, M. M., (2009). Teaching for understanding in Earth science: Comparing impacts on planning and instruction in three professional development designs for middle school science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20 (5), 415-436.
97. Reich, R. B., (2011). Aftershock: The next economy and America's future. New York: Vintage.
98. Rethinam, V., Pyke, C., &, Lynch, S., (2008). Using multi-level analyses to study the effectiveness of science curriculum. Evaluation & Research in Education, 21 (1), 18-42.
99. Rosebery, A., (2005). " What are we going to do next?" A case study of lesson planning. In, R. Nemirovsky, A. Rosebery, B. Warren, &, J. Solomon, (Eds.), Everyday matters in mathematics and science: Studies of complex classroom events (pp. 299-328). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
100. Rosebery, A., McIntyre, E., &, Gonzales, N., (2001). Connecting students' cultures to instruction. In, E. McIntyre, A. Rosebery, &, N. Gonzales, (Eds.), Classroom diversity: Connecting curriculum to students' lives (pp. 1-13). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
101. Rosebery, A., Ogonowski, M., DiSchino, M., &, Warren, B., (2010). " The coat traps all your body heat": Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19 (3), 322-357.
102. Rosebery, A., &, Warren, B., (Eds.). (2008). Teaching science to English language learners. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
103. Roth, K. J., Garnier, H. E., Chen, C., Lemmens, M., Schwille, K., &, Wickler, N. I. Z., (2011). Videobased lesson analysis: Effective PD for teacher and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48 (2), 117-148.
104. Rowan, B., (2002). The ecology of school improvement: Notes on the school improvement industry in the United States. Journal of Educational Change, 3 (3-4), 283-314.
105. Scafidi, B., Sjoquist, D. L., &, Stinebrickner, T. R., (2007). Race, poverty, and teacher mobility. Economics of Education Review, 26 (2), 145-159. (Pubitemid 46404842)
106. Schneider, R. M., &, Krajcik, J., (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13 (3), 221-245.
107. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., &, Campbell, D. T., (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
108. Shear, L., &, Penuel, W. R., (2010). Rock-solid support: Florida district weighs effectiveness of science professional learning. Journal of Staff Development, 31 (5), 48-51.
109. Sloane, F.C., (2008). Through the looking glass: Experiments, quasi-experiments, and the medical model. Educational Researcher, 37 (1), 41-46.
110. Smith, T. M., Desimone, L. M., Zeidner, T. L., Dunn, A. C., Bhatt, M., &, Rumyantseva, N. L., (2007). Inquiry-oriented instruction in science: Who teaches that way? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29 (3), 169-199.
111. Songer, N. B., Kelcey, B., &, Gotwals, A. W., (2009). How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (6), 610-631.
112. Songer, N. B., Lee, H.-S., &, Kam, R., (2002). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (2), 128-150.
113. Spillane, J. P., &, Callahan, K. E., (2002). Implementing state standards for science education: What district policy makers make of the hoopla. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (5), 201-225.
114. Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Walker, L. J., Halverson, R., &, Jita, L., (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (8), 918-940. (Pubitemid 33655596)
115. Stern, L., &, Ahlgren, A., (2002). Analysis of students' assessments in middle school curriculum materials: Aiming precisely at benchmarks and standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (9), 889-910.
116. Stevens, R., O'Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., &, Amos, D. M., (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97 (3), 355-368.
117. Sung, N. S., Crowley, W. F., Jr., Genel, M., Salber, P., Sandy, L., Sherwood, L. M., â∥, Rimoin, D., (2003). Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289 (10), 1278-1287. (Pubitemid 37432909)
118. Supovitz, J. A., (2008). Implementation as iterative refraction. In, J. A. Supovitz, &, E. H. Weinbaum, (Eds.), The implementation gap: Understanding reform in high schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
119. Supovitz, J. A., &, Turner, H. M., (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (2), 963-980.
120. Supovitz, J. A., &, Zief, S. G., (2000). Why they stay away: Survey reveals invisible barriers to teacher participation. Journal of Staff Development, 21 (4), 24-28.
121. Tabak, I., (2006). Prospects for change at the nexus of policy and design. Educational Resercher, 35 (2), 24-30.
122. Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., &, Fan, X., (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143-1144. (Pubitemid 43801123)
123. Tai, R. H., &, Maltese, A. V., (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32 (5), 669-685.
124. Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., Braaten, M., (2010). Developing a theory of teacher practice. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
125. Tzou, C. T., Bricker, L. A., &, Bell, P., (2007). Micros & Me: A fifth-grade science exploration into personally and culturally consequential microbiology. Seattle, WA: Everyday Science and Technology Group, University of Washington.
126. Vanosdall, R., Klentschy, M. P., Hedges, L. V., Weisbaum, K. S., (2007). A randomized study of the effects of scaffolded guided-inquiry instruction on student achievement in science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
127. Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, S., &, Hudicourt-Barnes, J., (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (5), 529-552. (Pubitemid 33655579)
128. Watson, M. C., Bond, C. M., Grimshaw, J. M., Mollison, J., Ludbrook, A., &, Walker, A. E., (2002). Educational strategies to promote evidence-based community pharmacy practice: A cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT). Family Practice, 19 (5), 529-536. (Pubitemid 35244241)
129. Weinbaum, E. H., &, Supovitz, J. A., (2010). Planning ahead: Make program implementation more predictable. Phi Delta Kappan, 91 (7), 68-71.
130. Wiggins, G., &, McTighe, J., (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
131. Willinsky, J., (2001). The strategic education research program and the public value of research. Educational Researcher, 30 (1), 5-14. (Pubitemid 33239390)
132. Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., &, Braaten, M., (2008). How novice science teachers appropriate epistemic discourses around model-based inquiry for use in classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 26 (3), 310-378.
133. Woolf, S. H., (2008). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 299 (2), 211-213.