Detection of Salmonella Enteritidis in asymptomatic carrier animals: Comparison of quantitative real-time PCR and bacteriological culture methods

Genetics and Molecular Research

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 2578-2588

  Maciel, B M ^a   Dias, J C T ^a   Romano, C C ^a   Sriranganathan, N ^b   Brendel, M ^a   Rezende, R P ^a  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS   (Brazil)

^b CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Asymptomatic carrier animals; Quantitative real time PCR; Salmonella enteritidis detection; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; C57BL 6 MOUSE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE CARRIER; DISEASE MODEL; FECES; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GOLD STANDARD; INTESTINE; KAPPA STATISTICS; LIMIT OF DETECTION; LIVER; MELTING POINT; MESENTERY LYMPH NODE; MODEL; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SEROVAR ENTERITIDIS; SPLEEN; ANIMAL; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; MICROBIOLOGY; MOUSE; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS; SALMONELLOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BACTERIAL DNA;

ANIMALS; BACTERIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; DNA, BACTERIAL; MICE; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84856442859     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16765680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4238/2011.October.24.1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Agron PG, Walker RL, Kinde H, Sawyer SJ, et al. (2001). Identification by subtractive hybridization of sequences specific for Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 4984-4991.
2. APHA-American Public Health Association (1992). Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. 3rd edn. American Public Health Association, Washington.
3. Boutaga K, van Winkelhoff AJ, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM and Savelkoul PH (2003). Comparison of real-time PCR and culture for detection of Porphyromonas gingivalis in subgingival plaque samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 4950-4954.
4. Buh GM, Cankar K, Zel J and Gruden K (2008). Comparison of different real-time PCR chemistries and their suitability for detection and quantification of genetically modified organisms. BMC Biotechnol. 8: 26.
5. Center for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) (1990). Update: Salmonella enteritidis infections and shell eggs-United States, 1990. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly Rep. 39: 902-912.
6. Center for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) (1992). Outbreak of Salmonella enteritidis infection associated with consumption of raw shell eggs, 1991. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly Rep. 41: 369-372.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2003). Outbreaks of Salmonella serotype Enteritidis infection associated with eating shell eggs-United States, 1999-2001. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly Rep. 51: 1149-1152.
8. Chen S, Yee A, Griffiths M, Larkin C, et al. (1997). The evaluation of a fluorogenic polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Salmonella species in food commodities. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 35: 239-250.
9. De Medici D, Croci L, Delibato E, Di Pasquale S, et al. (2003). Evaluation of DNA extraction methods for use in combination with SYBR green I real-time PCR to detect Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis in poultry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 3456-3461.
10. Deng SX, Cheng AC, Wang MS and Cao P (2007). Gastrointestinal tract distribution of Salmonella enteritidis in orally infected mice with a species-specific fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction. World J. Gastroenterol. 13: 6568-6574.
11. Deng SX, Cheng AC, Wang MS, Cao P, et al. (2008). Quantitative studies of the regular distribution pattern for Salmonella enteritidis in the internal organs of mice after oral challenge by a specific real-time polymerase chain reaction. World J. Gastroenterol. 14: 782-789.
12. EFSA (2006). Opinion of the Scientific Panel on biological hazards (BIOHAZ) related to "risk assessment and mitigation options of Salmonella in pig production". EFSA J 341: 1-131.
13. Ellingson JL, Anderson JL, Carlson SA and Sharma VK (2004). Twelve hour real-time PCR technique for the sensitive and specific detection of Salmonella in raw and ready-to-eat meat products. Mol. Cell Probes 18: 51-57.
14. Espy MJ, Uhl JR, Sloan LM, Buckwalter SP, et al. (2006). Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: applications for routine laboratory testing. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19: 165-256.
15. Galán JE and Zhou D (2000). Striking a balance: modulation of the actin cytoskeleton by Salmonella. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97: 8754-8761.
16. Hadjinicolaou AV, Demetriou VL, Emmanuel MA, Kakoyiannis CK, et al. (2009). Molecular beacon-based real-time PCR detection of primary isolates of Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis in environmental and clinical samples. BMC Microbiol. 9: 97.
17. Hald T, Vose D, Wegener HC and Koupeev T (2004). A Bayesian approach to quantify the contribution of animal-food sources to human salmonellosis. Risk Anal. 24: 255-269.
18. Josefsen MH, Krause M, Hansen F and Hoorfar J (2007). Optimization of a 12-hour TaqMan PCR-based method for detection of Salmonella bacteria in meat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 3040-3048.
19. Lemmon GH and Gardner SN (2008). Predicting the sensitivity and specificity of published real-time PCR assays. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 7: 18.
20. Maciel BM, Argôlo Filho RC, Freitas ES, Kruschewsky FF, et al. (2004). Ocorrência de sorotipos exóticos de Salmonella encontrados em cães assintomáticos nos distritos do município de Ilhéus / BA-Brasil. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. 41: 247-253.
21. Maciel BM, Argolo Filho RC, Nogueira SS, Dias JC, et al. (2010). High prevalence of Salmonella in tegu lizards (Tupinambis merianae), and susceptibility of the serotypes to antibiotics. Zoonoses Public Health 57: e26-e32.
22. Malorny B, Hoorfar J, Hugas M, Heuvelink A, et al. (2003). Interlaboratory diagnostic accuracy of a Salmonella specific PCR-based method. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 89: 241-249.
23. Malorny B, Paccassoni E, Fach P, Bunge C, et al. (2004). Diagnostic real-time PCR for detection of Salmonella in food. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 7046-7052.
24. Malorny B, Made D, Teufel P, Berghof-Jager C, et al. (2007). Multicenter validation study of two blockcycler-and one capillary-based real-time PCR methods for the detection of Salmonella in milk powder. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 117: 211-218.
25. Malorny B, Lofstrom C, Wagner M, Kramer N, et al. (2008). Enumeration of salmonella bacteria in food and feed samples by real-time PCR for quantitative microbial risk assessment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 1299-1304.
26. Martin SW (1984). Estimating disease prevalence and the interpretation of screening test results. Prev. Vet. Med. 2: 463-472.
27. Nam HM, Srinivasan V, Gillespie BE, Murinda SE, et al. (2005). Application of SYBR green real-time PCR assay for specific detection of Salmonella spp. in dairy farm environmental samples. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 102: 161-171.
28. Nga TV, Karkey A, Dongol S, Thuy HN, et al. (2010). The sensitivity of real-time PCR amplification targeting invasive Salmonella serovars in biological specimens. BMC Infect. Dis. 10: 125.
29. O'Brien JDP (1990). Aspects of Salmonella enteritidis control in poultry. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 46: 119-124.
30. Perelle S, Dilasser F, Malorny B, Grout J, et al. (2004). Comparison of PCR-ELISA and LightCycler real-time PCR assays for detecting Salmonella spp. in milk and meat samples. Mol. Cell Probes 18: 409-420.
31. Pintar K, Cook A, Pollari F, Ravel A, et al. (2007). Quantitative effect of refrigerated storage time on the enumeration of Campylobacter, Listeria, and Salmonella on artificially inoculated raw chicken meat. J. Food Prot. 70: 739-743.
32. Temelli S, Kahya S, Eyigor A and Carli KT (2010). Incidence of Salmonella Enteritidis in chicken layer flocks in Turkey: Results by real-time polymerase chain reaction and International Organization for Standardization culture methods. Poult. Sci. 89: 1406-1410.
33. WHO-GFN (2009). WHO Global Foodborne Infections Network Country Databank-A resource to link human and non-human sources of Salmonella. Available at [http://www.who.int/gfn/activities/CDB_poster_Sept09.pdf]. Accessed June 27, 2009.
34. Wolffs PF, Glencross K, Thibaudeau R and Griffiths MW (2006). Direct quantitation and detection of salmonellae in biological samples without enrichment, using two-step filtration and real-time PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 3896-3900.