Computational neuroanatomy of speech production

Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 135-145

  Hickok, Gregory ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MOTOR CONTROL; NEUROANATOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPEECH;

CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEUROANATOMY; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SPEECH;

EID: 84856039549     PISSN: 1471003X     EISSN: 14710048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrn3158     Document Type: Review

References (138)

1. Dell, G. S. A spreading activation theory of retrieval in language production. Psychol. Rev. 93, 283-321 (1986).
2. Fromkin, V. The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language 47, 27-52 (1971).
3. Levelt, W. J. Roelofs, A. & Meyer, A. S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 1-75 (1999). (Pubitemid 29207458)
4. Garrett, M. F. in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation Vol. 9 (ed. Bower, G. H.) 133-177 (Academic Press, New York, 1975).
5. Guenther, F. H., Hampson, M. & Johnson, D. A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. Psychol. Rev. 105, 611-633 (1998). (Pubitemid 128456526)
6. Houde, J. F. & Jordan, M. I. Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science 279, 1213-1216 (1998). (Pubitemid 28164374)
7. Fairbanks, G. Systematic research in experimental phonetics. I. A theory of the speech mechanism as a servosystem. J. Speech Hear. Disord. 19, 133-139 (1954).
8. Kawato, M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 718-727 (1999).
9. Shadmehr, R. & Krakauer, J. W. A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Exp. Brain Res. 185, 359-381 (2008).
10. Shadmehr, R. & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J. Neurosci. 14, 3208-3224 (1994). (Pubitemid 24139004)
11. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z. & Jordan, M. I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269, 1880-1882 (1995).
12. Tian, X. & Poeppel, D. Mental imagery of speech and movement implicates the dynamics of internal forward models. Front. Psychol. 1, 166 (2010).
13. Grafton, S. T. The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments. Exp. Brain Res. 204, 475-491 (2010).
14. Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K. & Kawato, M. A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358, 593-602 (2003). (Pubitemid 36380538)
15. Perkell, J. S. et al. Speech motor control: acoustic goals, saturation effects, auditory feedback and internal models. Speech Commun. 22, 227-250 (1997).
16. Burnett, T. A., Freedland, M. B., Larson, C. R. & Hain, T. C. Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3153-3161 (1998). (Pubitemid 28274936)
17. Larson, C. R., Burnett, T. A., Bauer, J. J., Kiran, S. & Hain, T. C. Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 2845-2848 (2001). (Pubitemid 33144285)
18. Tourville, J. A., Reilly, K. J. & Guenther, F. H. Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech. Neuroimage 39, 1429-1443 (2008).
19. Tremblay, S., Shiller, D. M. & Ostry, D. J. Somatosensory basis of speech production. Nature 423, 866-869 (2003). (Pubitemid 36781277)
20. Grafton, S. T., Aziz-Zadeh, L. & Ivry, R. B. in The Cognitive Neurosciences Ch. 44 (ed. Gazzaniga, M. S.) 641-652 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 2009).
21. Grafton, S. T. & Hamilton, A. F. Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Hum. Mov. Sci. 26, 590-616 (2007). (Pubitemid 47324192)
22. Diedrichsen, J., Shadmehr, R. & Ivry, R. B. The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 31-39 (2010).
23. Jackson, J. H. Remarks on evolution and dissolution of the nervous system. J. Ment. Sci. 33, 25-48 (1887).
24. Gracco, V. L. Some organizational characteristics of speech movement control. J. Speech Hear. Res. 37, 4-27 (1994). (Pubitemid 24058903)
25. Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica 49, 155-180 (1992).
26. Plaut, D. C. & Kello, C. T. in The Emergence of Language Ch. 14 (ed. MacWhinney, B.) 381-416 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, USA, 1999).
27. Bock, K. in The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (eds Wilson, R. A. & Keil, F. C.) 453-456 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1999).
28. Dell, G. S. in An Invitation to Cognitive Science: Language Ch. 7 (eds Glietman, L. R. & Liberman, M.) 183-208 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1995).
29. Levelt, W. J. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1989).
30. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M. & Gagnon, D. A. Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychol. Rev. 104, 801-838 (1997). (Pubitemid 127499382)
31. Levelt, W. J. Models of word production. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 223-232 (1999). (Pubitemid 29261901)
32. Vigliocco, G., Antonini, T. & Garrett, M. F. Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychol. Sci. 8, 314-317 (1998).
33. Levelt, W. J. Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 14, 41-104 (1983).
34. Nozari, N., Dell, G. S. & Schwartz, M. F. Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production. Cogn. Psychol. 63, 1-33 (2011).
35. Oppenheim, G. M. & Dell, G. S. Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition 106, 528-537 (2008). (Pubitemid 350236136)
36. Postma, A. Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models. Cognition 77, 97-132 (2000).
37. Huettig, F. & Hartsuiker, R. J. Listening to yourself is like listening to others: external, but not internal, verbal self-monitoring is based on speech perception. Lang. Cognitive Proc. 25, 347-374 (2010).
38. Nickels, L. & Howard, D. Phonological errors in aphasic naming: comprehension, monitoring and lexicality. Cortex 31, 209-237 (1995).
39. Ozdemir, R., Roelofs, A. & Levelt, W. J. Perceptual uniqueness point effects in monitoring internal speech. Cognition 105, 457-465 (2007). (Pubitemid 47364726)
40. Golfinopoulos, E., Tourville, J. A. & Guenther, F. H. The integration of large-scale neural network modeling and functional brain imaging in speech motor control. Neuroimage 52, 862-874 (2010).
41. Hickok, G., Houde, J. & Rong, F. Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: computational basis and neural organization. Neuron 69, 407-422 (2011).
42. Houde, J. F. & Nagarajan, S. S. Speech production as state feedback control. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5, 82 (2011).
43. Hickok, G., Buchsbaum, B., Humphries, C. & Muftuler, T. Auditory-motor interaction revealed by fMRI: speech, music, and working memory in area Spt. J. Cognitive Neurosci. 15, 673-682 (2003). (Pubitemid 36871881)
44. Hickok, G., Okada, K. & Serences, J. T. Area Spt in the human planum temporale supports sensory-motor integration for speech processing. J. Neurophysiol. 101, 2725-2732 (2009).
45. Howard, D. & Nickels, L. Separating input and output phonology: semantic, phonological, and orthographic effects in short-term memory impairment. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 22, 42-77 (2005). (Pubitemid 40309959)
46. Jacquemot, C., Dupoux, E. & Bachoud-Levi, A. C. Breaking the mirror: asymmetrical disconnection between the phonological input and output codes. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 24, 3-22 (2007). (Pubitemid 46938691)
47. Shelton, J. R. & Caramazza, A. Deficits in lexical and semantic processing: implications for models of normal language. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 6, 5-27 (1999).
48. Ventura, M. I., Nagarajan, S. S. & Houde, J. F. Speech target modulates speaking induced suppression in auditory cortex. BMC Neurosci. 10, 58 (2009).
49. Lichtheim, L. On aphasia. Brain 7, 433-484 (1885).
50. Wernicke, C. in Wernicke's Works on Aphasia: A Sourcebook and Review (ed. Eggert, G. H.) 91-145 (Mouton, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1874/1977).
51. Gracco, V. L. & Lofqvist, A. Speech motor coordination and control: evidence from lip, jaw, and laryngeal movements. J. Neurosci. 14, 6585-6597 (1994). (Pubitemid 24333079)
52. Perkell, J. S. Movement goals and feedback and feedback control mechanisms in speech production. J. Neurolinguist. 26 Mar 2010 (doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.02.011).
53. Wilson, S. M., Saygin, A. P., Sereno, M. I. & Iacoboni, M. Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nature Neurosci. 7, 701-702 (2004). (Pubitemid 38859052)
54. Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G. & Rizzolatti, G. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 15, 399-402 (2002). (Pubitemid 35471962)
55. Cooper, W. E. & Lauritsen, M. R. Feature processing in the perception and production of speech. Nature 252, 121-123 (1974).
56. Delvaux, V. & Soquet, A. The influence of ambient speech on adult speech productions through unintentional imitation. Phonetica 64, 145-173 (2007).
57. Kappes, J., Baumgaertner, A., Peschke, C. & Ziegler, W. Unintended imitation in nonword repetition. Brain Lang. 111, 140-151 (2009).
58. Christman, S. S., Boutsen, F. R. & Buckingham, H. W. Perseveration and other repetitive verbal behaviors: functional dissociations. Semin. Speech Lang. 25, 295-307 (2004). (Pubitemid 40012092)
59. Duffy, J. R. Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management (Mosby, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 1995).
60. Niemi, M., Laaksonen, J. P., Ojala, S., Aaltonen, O. & Happonen, R. P. Effects of transitory lingual nerve impairment on speech: an acoustic study of sibilant sound/s/. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 35, 920-923 (2006). (Pubitemid 44542556)
61. Niemi, M., Laaksonen, J. P., Aaltonen, O. & Happonen, R. P. Effects of transitory lingual nerve impairment on speech: an acoustic study of diphthong sounds. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 62, 44-51 (2004). (Pubitemid 38056129)
62. Niemi, M. et al. Acoustic and neurophysiologic observations related to lingual nerve impairment. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 38, 758-765 (2009).
63. Perkell, J. S. et al. The distinctness of speakers'/s/-/S/contrast is related to their auditory discrimination and use of an articulatory saturation effect. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 47, 1259-1269 (2004). (Pubitemid 40110794)
64. Liberman, A. M. Some results of research on speech perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29, 117-123 (1957).
65. Indefrey, P. & Levelt, W. J. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 92, 101-144 (2004). (Pubitemid 38270264)
66. Rizzolatti, G. et al. Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements. Exp. Brain Res. 71, 491-507 (1988).
67. Rizzolatti, G. et al. Neurons related to reaching-grasping arm movements in the rostral part of area 6 (area 6aβ). Exp. Brain Res. 82, 337-350 (1990). (Pubitemid 20378092)
68. Rizzolatti, G. et al. Neurons related to goal-directed motor acts in inferior area 6 of the macaque monkey. Exp. Brain Res. 67, 220-224 (1987). (Pubitemid 17100471)
69. Peeva, M. G. et al. Distinct representations of phonemes, syllables, and supra-syllabic sequences in the speech production network. Neuroimage 50, 626-638 (2010).
70. Aichert, I. & Ziegler, W. Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech. Brain Lang. 88, 148-159 (2004). (Pubitemid 38041163)
71. Laganaro, M., Croisier, M., Bagou, O. & Assal, F. Progressive apraxia of speech as a window into the study of speech planning processes. Cortex 26 Mar 2011 (doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.03.010).
72. Ogar, J., Slama, H., Dronkers, N., Amici, S. & Gorno-Tempini, M. L. Apraxia of speech: an overview. Neurocase 11, 427-432 (2005). (Pubitemid 43101850)
73. Hillis, A. E. et al. Re-examining the brain regions crucial for orchestrating speech articulation. Brain 127, 1479-1487 (2004). (Pubitemid 38899401)
74. Dronkers, N. F. A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation. Nature 384, 159-161 (1996). (Pubitemid 26386469)
75. Ogar, J. et al. Clinical and anatomical correlates of apraxia of speech. Brain Lang. 97, 343-350 (2006).
76. Ito, M. Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 9, 304-313 (2008). (Pubitemid 351430830)
77. Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C. & Kawato, M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 338-347 (1998). (Pubitemid 28396569)
78. Nowak, D. A., Topka, H., Timmann, D., Boecker, H. & Hermsdorfer, J. The role of the cerebellum for predictive control of grasping. Cerebellum 6, 7-17 (2007). (Pubitemid 46410669)
79. Desmurget, M. & Grafton, S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 423-431 (2000).
80. Pasalar, S., Roitman, A. V., Durfee, W. K. & Ebner, T. J. Force field effects on cerebellar Purkinje cell discharge with implications for internal models. Nature Neurosci. 9, 1404-1411 (2006). (Pubitemid 44646213)
81. Shadmehr, R., Smith, M. A. & Krakauer, J. W. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 33, 89-108 (2010).
82. Baldo, J. V., Klostermann, E. C. & Dronkers, N. F. It's either a cook or a baker: patients with conduction aphasia get the gist but lose the trace. Brain Lang. 105, 134-140 (2008).
83. Buchsbaum, B. R. et al. Conduction aphasia, sensory-motor integration, and phonological short-term memory-an aggregate analysis of lesion and fMRI data. Brain Lang. 119, 119-128 (2011).
84. Damasio, H. & Damasio, A. R. The anatomical basis of conduction aphasia. Brain 103, 337-350 (1980). (Pubitemid 10046627)
85. Goodglass, H. in Conduction Aphasia Ch. 3 (ed. Kohn, S. E.) 39-49 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, USA, 1992).
86. Ackermann, H., Mathiak, K. & Riecker, A. The contribution of the cerebellum to speech production and speech perception: clinical and functional imaging data. Cerebellum 6, 202-213 (2007). (Pubitemid 47360068)
87. Ackermann, H., Vogel, M., Petersen, D. & Poremba, M. Speech deficits in ischaemic cerebellar lesions. J. Neurol. 239, 223-227 (1992).
88. Oppenheim, G. M. & Dell, G. S. Motor movement matters: the flexible abstractness of inner speech. Mem. Cognit. 38, 1147-1160 (2010).
89. Buchsbaum, B., Hickok, G. & Humphries, C. Role of left posterior superior temporal gyrus in phonological processing for speech perception and production. Cogn. Sci. 25, 663-678 (2001). (Pubitemid 33692685)
90. Buchsbaum, B. R., Olsen, R. K., Koch, P. & Berman, K. F. Human dorsal and ventral auditory streams subserve rehearsal-based and echoic processes during verbal working memory. Neuron 48, 687-697 (2005). (Pubitemid 41654688)
91. Murphy, K. et al. Cerebral areas associated with motor control of speech in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 83, 1438-1447 (1997). (Pubitemid 27495314)
92. Shuster, L. I. & Lemieux, S. K. An fMRI investigation of covertly and overtly produced mono-and multisyllabic words. Brain Lang. 93, 20-31 (2005). (Pubitemid 40342718)
93. Smiley, J. F. et al. Multisensory convergence in auditory cortex. I. Cortical connections of the caudal superior temporal plane in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 502, 894-923 (2007). (Pubitemid 46806627)
94. Schroeder, C. E. et al. Somatosensory input to auditory association cortex in the macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 85, 1322-1327 (2001). (Pubitemid 32209618)
95. Foxe, J. J. et al. Multisensory auditory-somatosensory interactions in early cortical processing revealed by high-density electrical mapping. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res.10, 77-83 (2000).
96. Murray, M. M. et al. Grabbing your ear: rapid auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in low-level sensory cortices are not constrained by stimulus alignment. Cereb. Cortex 15, 963-974 (2005). (Pubitemid 40848065)
97. Foxe, J. J. et al. Auditory-somatosensory multisensory processing in auditory association cortex: an fMRI study. J. Neurophysiol. 88, 540-543 (2002). (Pubitemid 34755375)
98. Lakatos, P., Chen, C. M., O'Connell, M. N., Mills, A. & Schroeder, C. E. Neuronal oscillations and multisensory interaction in primary auditory cortex. Neuron 53, 279-292 (2007). (Pubitemid 46074398)
99. Aliu, S. O., Houde, J. F. & Nagarajan, S. S. Motor-induced suppression of the auditory cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 791-802 (2009).
100. Heinks-Maldonado, T. H. et al. Relationship of imprecise corollary discharge in schizophrenia to auditory hallucinations. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 64, 286-296 (2007). (Pubitemid 46376780)
101. Frith, C. D., Blakemore, S. & Wolpert, D. M. Explaining the symptoms of schizophrenia: abnormalities in the awareness of action. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 31, 357-363 (2000). (Pubitemid 30136191)
102. Paus, T., Perry, D. W., Zatorre, R. J., Worsley, K. J. & Evans, A. C. Modulation of cerebral blood flow in the human auditory cortex during speech: role of motor-to-sensory discharges. Eur. J. Neurosci. 8, 2236-2246 (1996). (Pubitemid 26387885)
103. Christoffels, I. K., van de Ven, V., Waldorp, L. J., Formisano, E. & Schiller, N. O. The sensory consequences of speaking: parametric neural cancellation during speech in auditory cortex. PLoS ONE 6, e18307 (2011).
104. Eliades, S. J. & Wang, X. Sensory-motor interaction in the primate auditory cortex during self-initiated vocalizations. J. Neurophysiol. 89, 2194-2207 (2003). (Pubitemid 36444272)
105. Meister, I. G., Wilson, S. M., Deblieck, C., Wu, A. D. & Iacoboni, M. The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception. Curr. Biol. 17, 1692-1696 (2007). (Pubitemid 47503812)
106. D'Ausilio, A. et al. The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Curr. Biol. 19, 381-385 (2009).
107. Callan, D. E., Jones, J. A., Callan, A. M. & Akahane-Yamada, R. Phonetic perceptual identification by native-and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models. Neuroimage 22, 1182-1194 (2004). (Pubitemid 38829207)
108. Wilson, S. M. & Iacoboni, M. Neural responses to non-native phonemes varying in producibility: evidence for the sensorimotor nature of speech perception. Neuroimage 33, 316-325 (2006). (Pubitemid 44397572)
109. Jazayeri, M. & Movshon, J. A. Optimal representation of sensory information by neural populations. Nature Neurosci. 9, 690-696 (2006). (Pubitemid 44012268)
110. Jazayeri, M. & Movshon, J. A. A new perceptual illusion reveals mechanisms of sensory decoding. Nature 446, 912-915 (2007). (Pubitemid 46633170)
111. Regan, D. & Beverley, K. I. Postadaptation orientation discrimination. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 147-155 (1985).
112. Scolari, M. & Serences, J. T. Adaptive allocation of attentional gain. J. Neurosci. 29, 11933-11942 (2009).
113. Vigliocco, G. & Hartsuiker, R. J. The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in sentence production. Psychol. Bull. 128, 442-472 (2002).
114. Friston, K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Rev. Neurosci. 11, 127-138 (2010).
115. Summerfield, C. & Egner, T. Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 403-409 (2009).
116. Hickok, G. et al. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of the role of left posterior superior temporal gyrus in speech production: implications for the explanation of conduction aphasia. Neurosci. Lett. 287, 156-160 (2000). (Pubitemid 30353070)
117. Anderson, J. M. et al. Conduction aphasia and the arcuate fasciculus: a reexamination of the Wernicke-Geschwind model. Brain Lang. 70, 1-12 (1999). (Pubitemid 29526045)
118. Dronkers, N. & Baldo, J. in Encyclopedia of Neuroscience (ed. Squire, L. R.) 343-348 (Academic Press, Oxford, 2009).
119. Hickok, G. in Language and the Brain Ch. 4 (eds Grodzinsky, Y., Shapiro, L. & Swinney, D.) 87-104 (Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA, 2000).
120. Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A. & Turvey, M. T. The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13, 361-377 (2006). (Pubitemid 44825057)
121. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. Perception of the speech code. Psychol. Rev. 74, 431-461 (1967).
122. Hickok, G. The role of mirror neurons in speech perception and action word semantics. Lang. Cognitive Proc. 25, 749-776 (2010).
123. Lotto, A. J., Hickok, G. S. & Holt, L. L. Reflections on mirror neurons and speech perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 110-114 (2009).
124. Massaro, D. W. & Chen, T. H. The motor theory of speech perception revisited. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 15, 453-462 (2008).
125. Liberman, A. M. & Mattingly, I. G. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21, 1-36 (1985).
126. Stevens, K. N. & Blumstein, S. E. Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 1358-1368 (1978). (Pubitemid 9051750)
127. Stevens, K. N. & Halle, M. in Models for the Perception of Speech and Visual Form (ed. Walthen-Dunn, W.) 88-102 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1967).
128. Nusbaum, H. C. & Magnuson, J. S. in Talker Variability in Speech Processing Ch. 6 (eds Johnson, K. & Mullennix, J. W.) 109-132 (Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA, 1997).
129. McClelland, J. L. & Elman, J. L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cogn. Psychol. 18, 1-86 (1986).
130. Massaro, D. W. in Handbook of Psycholinguistics Ch. 7 (ed. Gernsbacher, M. A.) 219-263 (Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA, 1994).
131. Vaden, K. I., Piquado, T. & Hickok, G. Sublexical properties of spoken words modulate activity in Broca's area but not superior temporal cortex: implications for models of speech recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 2665-2674 (2011).
132. Greenberg, S. in Listening to Speech: An Auditory Perspective Ch. 25 (eds Greenberg, S. & Ainsworth, W. A.) 411-433 (Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, USA, 2005).
133. Klatt, D. H. Speech perception: a model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. J. Phonetics 7, 279-312 (1979).
134. Johnson, K. The auditory/perceptual basis for speech segmentation. OSU Work. Pap. Ling. 50, 101-113 (1997).
135. Johnson, K. Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: the emergence of social identity and phonology. J. Phonetics 34, 485-499 (2006). (Pubitemid 44774285)
136. Goldinger, S. D. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychol. Rev. 105, 251-279 (1998). (Pubitemid 128457847)
137. Stevens, K. N. Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1872-1891 (2002). (Pubitemid 34297244)
138. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition 25, 71-102 (1987).