Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1147-1160

  Oppenheim, Gary M ^a   Dell, Gary S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHONETICS; SPEECH; THINKING; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SPEECH; THINKING; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650670063     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.8.1147     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Abramson, M., & Goldinger, S. D. (1997). What the reader's eye tells the mind's ear: Silent reading activates inner speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1059-1068.
2. Aziz-Zadeh, L., Cattaneo, L., Rochat, M., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Covert speech arrest induced by rTMS over both motor and nonmotor left hemisphere frontal sites. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 928-938. doi:10.1162/0898929054021157 (Pubitemid 40800026)
3. Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14, 382-391. doi:10.1016/S0022 -5371(75)80017-X
4. Baddeley, A., & Wilson, B. (1985). Phonological coding and shortterm memory in patients without speech. Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 490-502. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90041-5
5. Bailey, T. M., & Hahn, U. (2005). Phoneme similarity and confusability. Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 339-362. doi:10.1016/ j.jml.2004.12.003
6. Barch, D. M., Sabb, F. W., Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Noll, D. C., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Overt verbal responding during fMRI scanning: Empirical investigations of problems and potential solutions. NeuroImage, 10, 642-657. doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0500 (Pubitemid 30026758)
7. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577-609. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99002149 (Pubitemid 29526169)
8. Brocklehurst, P., & Corley, M. (2009, September). Lexical bias and phonemic similarity: The case of inner speech. Poster presented at the 15th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, Barcelona.
9. Caplan, D., Rochon, E., & Waters, G. S. (1992). Articulatory and phonological determinants of word length effects in span tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 177-192. doi:10.1080/14640749208401323
10. Cook, A. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2008). Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: New evidence from dual-task experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 886-899. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.886
11. Dell, G. S. (1978). Slips of the mind. In M. Paradis (Ed.), The fourth LACUS forum (pp. 69-75). Columbia, SC: Hornbeam.
12. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321. doi:10.1037/0033-295X. 93.3.283
13. Dell, G. S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language & Cognitive Processes, 5, 313-349. doi:10.1080/01690969008407066
14. Dell, G. S., & Repka, R. J. (1992). Errors in inner speech. In B. J. Baars (Ed.), Experimental slips and human error: Exploring the architecture of volition (pp. 237-262). New York: Plenum.
15. Ferreira, V. S., & Pashler, H. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 1187-1199. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.6. 1187
16. Frisch, S. (1996). Similarity and frequency in phonology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
17. Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 361-377.
18. Garnsey, S. M., & Dell, G. S. (1984). Some neurolinguistic implications of prearticulatory editing in production. Brain & Language, 23, 64-73. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(84)90006-3
19. Gibbons, J. D. (1985). Nonparametric methods for quantitative analysis (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: American Sciences Press.
20. Goldrick, M. (2004). Phonological features and phonotactic constraints in speech production. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 586-603. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.004 (Pubitemid 39436154)
21. Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2007). Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition, 102, 219-260. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.010 (Pubitemid 44917947)
22. Hartsuiker, R. J. (2006). Are speech error patterns affected by a monitoring bias? Language & Cognitive Processes, 21, 856-891. doi:10 .1080/01690960600824138
23. Hartsuiker, R. J., Corley, M., & Martensen, H. E. (2005). The lexical bias effect is modulated by context, but the standard monitoring account doesn't fly: Related beply to Baars et al. (1975). Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 58-70. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.006 (Pubitemid 40030603)
24. Hartsuiker, R. J., Kolk, H. H. J., & Martensen, H. (2005). The division of labor between internal and external speech monitoring. In R. J. Hartsuiker, R. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Phono-logical encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech (pp. 187-205). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
25. Hollander, M., & Wolfe, D. A. (1973). Nonparametric statistical methods. New York: Wiley.
26. Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47. doi:10.1007/BF02294263
27. Huettig, F., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Listening to yourself is like listening to others: External, but not internal, verbal self-monitoring is based on speech perception. Language & Cognitive Processes, 25, 347-374. doi:10.1080/01690960903046926
28. Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101-144. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001 (Pubitemid 38270264)
29. Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., Verkuilen, J., & Schwartz, M. F. (2008). Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 463-492. doi:10.1080/02643290701674851
30. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
31. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41-104. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4
33. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 83-122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776 (Pubitemid 29207458)
36. Liberman, A. M., Delattre, P., & Cooper, F. S. (1952). The role of selected stimulus-variables in the perception of the unvoiced stop consonants. American Journal of Psychology, 65, 497-516. doi:10.2307/1418032
37. Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36. doi:10.1016/0010 -0277(85)90021-6
38. MacKay, D. G. (1970). Spoonerisms: The structure of errors in the serial order of speech. Neuropsychologia, 8, 323-350. doi:10.1016/0028 -3932(70)90078-3
39. MacKay, D. G. (1981). The problem of rehearsal or mental practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 274-285.
40. MacKay, D. G. (1990). Perception, action, and awareness: A three-body problem. In O. Neumann, & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 269-303). Heidelberg: Springer.
41. MacKay, D. G. (1992). Constraints on theories of inner speech. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Auditory imagery (pp. 121-149). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. McGuire, P. K., Silbersweig, D. A., Murray, R. M., David, A. S., Frackowiak, R. S., & Frith, C. D. (1996). Functional anatomy of inner speech and auditory verbal imagery. Psychological Medicine, 26, 29-38. doi:10.1017/S0033291700033699
43. Moshagen, M. (2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 42-54. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.1.42
44. Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (1995). Phonological errors in aphasic naming: Comprehension, monitoring and lexicality. Cortex, 31, 209-237.
45. Nooteboom, S. G. (2005). Lexical bias revisited: Detecting, rejecting and repairing speech errors in inner speech. Speech Communication, 47, 43-58. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.003 (Pubitemid 41231580)
46. Nooteboom, S., & Quené, H. (2008). Self-monitoring and feedback: A new attempt to find the main cause of lexical bias in phonological speech errors. Journal of Memory & Language, 58, 837-861. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.003
47. Nozari, N., & Dell, G. S. (2009). More on lexical bias: How efficient can a "lexical editor" be? Journal of Memory & Language, 60, 291-307. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.09.006
48. Oomen, C. C., & Postma, A. (2001). Effects of time pressure on mechanisms of speech production and self-monitoring. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 163-184. doi:10.1023/A:1010377828778
49. Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. (2008). Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition, 106, 528-537. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.006 (Pubitemid 350236136)
50. Özdemir, R., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. (2007). Perceptual uniqueness point effects in monitoring internal speech. Cognition, 105, 457- 465. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.006 (Pubitemid 47364726)
51. Palmer, E. D., Rosen, H. J., Ojemann, J. G., Buckner, R. L., Kelley, W. M., & Petersen, S. E. (2001). An event-related fMRI study of overt and covert word stem completion. NeuroImage, 14, 182-193. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0779 (Pubitemid 32552754)
52. Paulesu, E., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1993). The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory. Nature, 362, 342-345. doi:10.1038/362342a0 (Pubitemid 23101305)
53. Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97-132. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00) 00090-1
54. Postma, A., & Noordanus, C. (1996). The production and detection of speech errors in silent, mouthed, noise-masked, and normal auditory feedback speech. Language & Speech, 39, 375-392.
55. Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576-582. doi:10.1038/nrn1706
56. Reisberg, D., Smith, J. D., Baxter, D. A., & Sonenshine, M. (1989). "Enacted" auditory images are ambiguous; "pure" auditory images are not. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 619-641.
57. Roelofs, A. (2004). Error biases in spoken word planning and monitoring by aphasic and nonaphasic speakers: Comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000). Psychological Review, 111, 561-572. doi:10.1037/0033 -295X.111.2.561
58. Sahin, N. T., Pinker, S., Cash, S. S., Schomer, D., & Halgren, E. (2009). Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information within Broca's area. Science, 326, 445-449. doi:10.1126/science. 1174481
59. Schiller, N. O., Jansma, B. M., Peters, J., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2006). Monitoring metrical stress in polysyllabic words. Language & Cognitive Processes, 21, 112-140. doi:10.1080/01690960400001861 (Pubitemid 43878488)
60. Shergill, S. S., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S. C. R., Murray, R. M., & McGuire, P. K. (2001). A functional study of auditory verbal imagery. Psychological Medicine, 31, 241-253. doi:10.1017/ S003329170100335X (Pubitemid 32166392)
61. Sheskin, D. (2000). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
62. Shuster, L. I., & Lemieux, S. K. (2005). An fMRI investigation of covertly and overtly produced mono- and multisyllabic words. Brain & Language, 93, 20-31. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.07.007 (Pubitemid 40342718)
63. Smith, J. D., Reisberg, D., & Wilson, M. (1992). Subvocalization and auditory imagery: Interactions between the inner ear and the inner voice. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Auditory imagery (pp. 95-119). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Smith, S. M., Brown, H. O., Toman, J. E. P., & Goodman, L. S. (1947). The lack of cerebral effects of d-tubocuarine. Anesthesiology, 8, 1-14. doi:10.1097/00000542-194701000-00001
65. Sokolov, A. N. (1972). Inner speech and thought. New York: Plenum.
66. Stemberger, J. P. (1991). Apparent anti-frequency effects in language production: The addition bias and phonological underspecification. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 161-185. doi:10.1016/0749 -596X(91)90002-2
67. Thompson-Schill, S. L., D'Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 14792-14797. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.26.14792 (Pubitemid 28041453)
68. Vallar, G., & Cappa, S. F. (1987). Articulation and verbal short-term memory: Evidence from anarthria. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4, 55-77. doi:10.1080/02643298708252035
69. Vigliocco, G., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2002). The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in sentence production. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 442-472. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.3.442
70. Vygotskiǐ, L. S. (1965). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71. Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158-177. doi:10.1037/h0074428
72. Wheeldon, L. R., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1995). Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 311-334. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1014
73. Yetkin, F. Z., Hammeke, T. A., Swanson, S. J., Morris, G. L., Mueller, W. M., McAuliffe, T. L., & Haughton, V. M. (1995). A comparison of functional MR activation patterns during silent and audible language tasks. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 16, 1087-1092.