Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech

NeuroImage

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1429-1443

  Tourville, Jason A ^a   Reilly, Kevin J ^a   Guenther, Frank H ^a,b,c,d  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD MIT DIVISION OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory feedback control; Effective connectivity; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Neural modeling; Speech production; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ARTICLE; BASAL GANGLION; BRAIN REGION; CEREBELLUM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA ANALYSIS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INSULA; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARIETAL LOBE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROLANDIC CORTEX; SPEECH DISORDER; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VOCALIZATION;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OXYGEN; SPEECH;

EID: 37849013268     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.054     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Aron A.R., Robbins T.W., and Poldrack R.A. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 (2004) 170-177
2. Bauer J.J., Mittal J., Larson C.R., and Hain T.C. Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119 (2006) 2363-2371
3. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M., and Frith C.D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat. Neurosci. 1 (1998) 635-640
4. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D., and Frith C. Why can't you tickle yourself?. NeuroReport 11 11 (2000) R11-R16
5. Bohland J.W., and Guenther F.H. An fMRI investigation of syllable sequence production. NeuroImage 32 (2006) 821-841
6. Brown S., Ingham R.J., Ingham J.C., Laird A.R., and Fox P.T. Stuttered and fluent speech production: an ALE meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Hum. Brain Mapp. 25 (2005) 105-117
7. Buchsbaum B.R., Olsen R.K., Koch P.F., Kohn P., Kippenhan J.S., and Berman K.F. Reading, hearing, and the planum temporale. NeuroImage 24 (2005) 444-454
8. Burnett T.A., and Larson C.R. Early pitch-shift response is active in both steady and dynamic voice pitch control. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112 3 Pt. 1 (2002) 1058-1063
9. Caviness V.S., Meyer J., Makris N., and Kennedy D. MRI-based topographic parcellation of human neocortex: an anatomically specified method with estimate of reliability. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8 (1996) 566-587
10. Christoffels I.K., Formisano E., and Schiller N.O. Neural correlates of verbal feedback processing: an fMRI study employing overt speech. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28 (2007) 868-879
11. Clopper C.G., Pisoni D.B., and de Jong K. Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118 3 Pt. 1 (2005) 1661-1676
12. Collignon A., Maes F., Delaere D., Vandermeulen D., Suetens P., and Marchal G. Automated multi-modality image registration based on information theory. In: Y. Bizais Y., Barillot C., and Di Paola R. (Eds). Proc. Information Processing in Medical Imaging (1995), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 263-274
13. Cowie R.I., and Douglas-Cowie E. Speech production in profound post-lingual deafness. In: Lutman M.E., and Haggard M.P. (Eds). Hearing Science and Hearing Disorders (1983), Academic Press, New York 183-231
14. Curio G., Neuloh G., Numminen J., Jousmaki V., and Hari R. Speaking modifies voice-evoked activity in the human auditory cortex. Hum. Brain Mapp. 9 (2000) 183-191
15. De Nil L.F., Kroll R.M., Lafaille S.J., and Houle S. A positron emission tomography study of short- and long-term treatment effects on functional brain activation in adults who stutter. J. Fluen. 0Disord. 28 (2003) 357-379 (quiz 379-80)
16. Della-Maggiore V., Sekuler A.B., Grady C.L., Bennett P.J., Sekuler R., and McIntosh A.R. Corticolimbic interactions associated with performance on a short-term memory task are modified by age. J. Neurosci. 20 22 (2000) 8410-8416
17. Diedrichsen J., Hashambhoy Y., Rane T., and Shadmehr R. Neural correlates of reach errors. J. Neurosci. 25 43 (2005) 9919-9931
18. Donath T.M., Natke U., and Kalveram K.T. Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111 1 Pt. 1 (2002) 357-366
19. Dronkers N.F. A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation. Nature 384 6605 (1996) 159-161
20. Duffy J.R. Motor Speech Disorders (1995), Mosby, St. Louis, MO
21. Eliades S.J., and Wang X. Dynamics of auditory-vocal interaction in monkey auditory cortex. Cereb. Cortex 15 10 (2005) 1510-1523
22. Engelien A., Yang Y., Engelien W., Zonana J., Stern E., and Silbersweig D.A. Physiological mapping of human auditory cortices with a silent event-related fMRI technique. NeuroImage 16 (2002) 944-953
23. Evans A.C., Collins D.L., Mills S.R., Brown E.D., Kelly R.L., and Peters T.M. 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. Proc. IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Med. Imag. 3 (1993) 1813-1817
24. Ferguson S.H., and Kewley-Port D. Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112 (2002) 259-271
25. Fischl B., Salat D.H., Busa E., Albert M., Dieterich M., Haselgrove C., van der Kouwe A., Killiany R., Kennedy D., Klaveness S., Montillo A., Makris N., Rosen B., and Dale A.M. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33 (2002) 341-355
26. Fischl B., van der Kouwe A., Destrieux C., Halgren E., Segonne F., Salat D.H., Busa E., Seidman L.J., Goldstein J., Kennedy D., Caviness V., Makris N., Rosen B., and Dale A.M. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 14 (2004) 11-22
27. Friston K.J., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S., and Turner R. Characterizing dynamic brain responses with fMRI: a multivariate approach. NeuroImage 2 (1995) 166-172
28. Friston K.J., Holmes A.P., Poline J.B., Grasby P.J., Williams S.C., Frackowiak R.S., and Turner R. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. NeuroImage 2 (1995) 45-53
29. Fu C.H., Vythelingum G.N., Brammer M.J., Williams S.C., Amaro Jr. E., Andrew C.M., Yaguez L., van Haren N.E., Matsumoto K., and McGuire P.K. An fMRI study of verbal self-monitoring: neural correlates of auditory verbal feedback. Cereb. Cortex 16 (2006) 969-977
30. Guenther F.H., Hampson M., and Johnson D. A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. Psychol. Rev. 105 (1998) 611-633
31. Guenther F.H., Ghosh S.S., and Tourville J.A. Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain Lang. 96 (2006) 280-301
32. Habas C., and Cabanis E.A. Cortical areas functionally linked with the cerebellar second homunculus during out-of-phase bimanual movements. Neuroradiology 48 (2006) 273-279
33. Habas C., Axelrad H., Nguyen T.H., and Cabanis E.A. Specific neocerebellar activation during out-of-phase bimanual movements. NeuroReport 15 (2004) 595-599
34. Hain T.C., Burnett T.A., Kiran S., Larson C.R., Singh S., and Kenney M.K. Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex. Exp. Brain Res. 130 (2000) 133-141
35. Hashimoto Y., and Sakai K.L. Brain activations during conscious self-monitoring of speech production with delayed auditory feedback: an fMRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 20 (2003) 22-28
36. Heinks-Maldonado T.H., Nagarajan S.S., and Houde J.F. Magnetoencephalographic evidence for a precise forward model in speech production. NeuroReport 17 13 (2006) 1375-1379
37. Hickok G., Buchsbaum B., Humphries C., and Muftuler T. Auditory-motor interaction revealed by fMRI: speech, music, and working memory in area Spt. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15 (2003) 673-682
38. Hillenbrand J.M., Clark M.J., and Nearey T.M. Effects of consonant environment on vowel formant patterns. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 (2001) 748-763
39. Hillis A.E., Work M., Barker P.B., Jacobs M.A., Breese E.L., and Maurer K. Re-examining the brain regions crucial for orchestrating speech articulation. Brain 127 Pt. 7 (2004) 1479-1487
40. Hirano S., Kojima H., Naito Y., Honjo I., Kamoto Y., Okazawa H., Ishizu K., Yonekura Y., Nagahama Y., Fukuyama H., and Konishi J. Cortical processing mechanism for vocalization with auditory verbal feedback. NeuroReport 8 9-10 (1997) 2379-2382
41. Houde J.F., and Jordan M.I. Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science 279 5354 (1998) 1213-1216
42. Houde J.F., and Jordan M.I. Sensorimotor adaptation of speech: I. Compensation and adaptation. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 45 (2002) 295-310
43. Houde J.F., Nagarajan S.S., Sekihara K., and Merzenich M.M. Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: an MEG study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14 (2002) 1125-1138
44. Hu L., and Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Modeling 6 (1999) 1-55
45. Huang V.S., and Shadmehr R. Evolution of motor memory during the seconds after observation of motor error. J. Neurophysiol. 97 (2007) 3976-3985
46. Indefrey P., and Levelt W.J. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 92 1-2 (2004) 101-144
47. Ito T., Kimura T., and Gomi H. The motor cortex is involved in reflexive compensatory adjustment of speech articulation. NeuroReport 16 16 (2005) 1791-1794
48. Jones J.A., and Munhall K.G. The role of auditory feedback during phonation: studies of Mandarin tone production. J. Phon. 30 (2002) 303-320
49. Jones J.A., and Munhall K.G. Remapping auditory-motor representations in voice production. Curr. Biol. 15 19 (2005) 1768-1772
50. Kent R.D., and Tjaden K. Brain functions underlying speech. In: Hardcastle W.J., and Laver J. (Eds). Handbook of Phonetic Sciences (1997), Blackwell, Oxford 220-255
51. Kriegstein K.V., and Giraud A.L. Distinct functional substrates along the right superior temporal sulcus for the processing of voices. NeuroImage 22 (2004) 948-955
52. Lancaster J.L., Tordesillas-Gutierrez D., Martinez M., Salinas F., Evans A., Zilles K., Mazziotta J.C., and Fox P.T. Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM-152 brain template. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28 (2007) 1194-1205
53. Lane H., and Tranel B. The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 14 (1971) 677-709
54. Lane H., and Webster J.W. Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89 (1991) 859-866
55. Larson C.R., Burnett T.A., Kiran S., and Hain T.C. Effects of pitch-shift velocity on voice F0 responses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107 (2000) 559-564
56. Le T.H., Patel S., and Roberts T.P. Functional MRI of human auditory cortex using block and event-related designs. Magn. Reson. Med. 45 (2001) 254-260
57. Lombard E. Le signe de l'elevation de la voix. Ann. Mal. Oreille Larynx 37 (1911) 101-119
58. Matsumoto R., Nair D.R., LaPresto E., Najm I., Bingaman W., Shibasaki H., and Luders H.O. Functional connectivity in the human language system: a cortico-cortical evoked potential study. Brain 127 Pt. 10 (2004) 2316-2330
59. Max L., Guenther F.H., Gracco V.L., Ghosh S.S., and Wallace M.E. Unstable or insufficiently activated internal models and feedback-biased motor control as sources of dysfluency: a theoretical model of stuttering. Contemp. Issues Commun. Sci. Disord. 31 (2004) 105-122
60. Mazziotta J., Toga A., Evans A., Fox P., Lancaster J., Zilles K., Woods R., Paus T., Simpson G., Pike B., Holmes C., Collins L., Thompson P., MacDonald D., Iacoboni M., Schormann T., Amunts K., Palomero-Gallagher N., Geyer S., Parsons L., Narr K., Kabani N., Le Goualher G., Feidler J., Smith K., Boomsma D., Hulshoff Pol H., Cannon T., Kawashima R., and Mazoyer B. A four-dimensional probabilistic atlas of the human brain. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8 (2001) 401-430
61. McClean M.D., and Sapir S. Some effects of auditory stimulation on perioral motor unit discharge and their implications for speech production. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69 (1981) 1452-1457
62. McGuire P.K., Silbersweig D.A., and Frith C.D. Functional neuroanatomy of verbal self-monitoring. Brain 119 Pt. 3 (1996) 907-917
63. McIntosh A.R., and Gonzalez-Lima F. Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2 (1994) 2-22
64. Natke U., Donath T.M., and Kalveram K.T. Control of voice fundamental frequency in speaking versus singing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113 (2003) 1587-1593
65. Neilson M., and Neilson P. Speech motor control and stuttering: a computational model of adaptive sensory-motor processing. Speech Commun. 6 (1987) 325-333
66. Neumann K., Preibisch C., Euler H.A., von Gudenberg A.W., Lanfermann H., Gall V., and Giraud A.L. Cortical plasticity associated with stuttering therapy. J. Fluen. Disord. 30 (2005) 23-39
67. Nieto-Castanon A., Ghosh S.S., Tourville J.A., and Guenther F.H. Region of interest based analysis of functional imaging data. NeuroImage 19 (2003) 1303-1316
68. Numminen J., and Curio G. Differential effects of overt, covert and replayed speech on vowel-evoked responses of the human auditory cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 272 (1999) 29-32
69. Numminen J., Salmelin R., and Hari R. Subject's own speech reduces reactivity of the human auditory cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 265 (1999) 119-122
70. Ozdemir E., Norton A., and Schlaug G. Shared and distinct neural correlates of singing and speaking. NeuroImage 33 (2006) 628-635
71. Paus T., Perry D.W., Zatorre R.J., Worsley K.J., and Evans A.C. Modulation of cerebral blood flow in the human auditory cortex during speech: role of motor-to-sensory discharges. Eur. J. Neurosci. 8 11 (1996) 2236-2246
72. Pittman A.L., and Wiley T.L. Recognition of speech produced in noise. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 44 (2001) 487-496
73. Prabhakaran R., Blumstein S.E., Myers E.B., Hutchison E., and Britton B. An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological-lexical competition. Neuropsychologia 44 12 (2006) 2209-2221
74. Purcell D.W., and Munhall K.G. Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: evidence from real-time formant manipulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120 (2006) 966-977
75. Purcell D.W., and Munhall K.G. Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119 (2006) 2288-2297
76. Redding G.M., and Wallace B. Generalization of prism adaptation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32 (2006) 1006-1022
77. Riecker A., Ackermann H., Wildgruber D., Dogil G., and Grodd W. Opposite hemispheric lateralization effects during speaking and singing at motor cortex, insula and cerebellum. NeuroReport 11 (2000) 1997-2000
78. Schumacker R., and Lomax R. A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. (2004), Lawrence Elrbaum, Mahwah, N.J., USA
79. Sidtis J.J., Gomez C., Groshong A., Strother S.C., and Rottenberg D.A. Mapping cerebral blood flow during speech production in hereditary ataxia. NeuroImage 31 (2006) 246-254
80. Soros P., Sokoloff L.G., Bose A., McIntosh A.R., Graham S.J., and Stuss D.T. Clustered functional MRI of overt speech production. NeuroImage 32 (2006) 376-387
81. Stevens A.A., Skudlarski P., Gatenby J.C., and Gore J.C. Event-related fMRI of auditory and visual oddball tasks. Magn. Reson. Imaging 18 (2000) 495-502
82. Stuart A., Kalinowski J., Rastatter M.P., and Lynch K. Effect of delayed auditory feedback on normal speakers at two speech rates. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111 5 Pt. 1 (2002) 2237-2241
83. Talairach J., and Tournoux P. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain (1988), Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, NY
84. Toyomura A., Koyama S., Miyamaoto T., Terao A., Omori T., Murohashi H., and Kuriki S. Neural correlates of auditory feedback control in human. Neuroscience 146 (2007) 499-503
85. Tsao Y.C., and Weismer G. Interspeaker variation in habitual speaking rate: evidence for a neuromuscular component. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 40 (1997) 858-866
86. Villacorta V.M., Perkell J.S., and Guenther F.H. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations on vowel acoustics and its relation to perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122 (2007) 2306-2319
87. Wise R.J., Greene J., Buchel C., and Scott S.K. Brain regions involved in articulation. Lancet 353 9158 (1999) 1057-1061
88. Wolpert D.M., and Flanagan J.R. Motor prediction. Curr. Biol. 11 18 (2001) R729-R732
89. Xu Y., Larson C.R., Bauer J.J., and Hain T.C. Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116 (2004) 1168-1178
90. Yang Y., Engelien A., Engelien W., Xu S., Stern E., and Silbersweig D.A. A silent event-related functional MRI technique for brain activation studies without interference of scanner acoustic noise. Magn. Reson. Med. 43 (2000) 185-190
91. Yates A.J. Delayed auditory feedback. Psychol. Bull. 60 (1963) 213-232
92. Zarate J.M., and Zatorre R.J. Neural substrates governing audiovocal integration for vocal pitch regulation in singing. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1060 (2005) 404-408