Motor-induced suppression of the auditory cortex

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 791-802

  Aliu, Sheye O ^a,b   Houde, John F ^a   Nagarajan, Srikantan S ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Biomagnetic Imaging Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; STIMULUS RESPONSE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HABITUATION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NEURAL INHIBITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65449184188     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21055     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baron, M. R. (1952). The effect of long intertrial intervals on the limit of eyelid conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 438-441.
2. Begleiter, H., Porjesz, B., Yerre, C., & Kissin, B. (1973). Evoked potential correlates of expected stimulus intensity. Science, 179, 814-816.
3. Blakemore, S.-J., Frith, C. D., & Wolpert, D. M. (1999). Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 551-559. (Pubitemid 29520546)
4. Blakemore, S.-J., Rees, G., & Frith, C. D. (1998). How do we predict the consequences of our actions? A functional imaging study. Neuropsychologia, 36, 521-529.
5. Blakemore, S.-J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (1998). Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 635-640.
6. Blakemore, S.-J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Why can't you tickle yourself? NeuroReport, 11, R11-R16.
7. Eliades, S. J., & Wang, X. (2003). Sensory-motor interaction in the primate auditory cortex during self-initiated vocalizations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 2194-2207. (Pubitemid 36444272)
8. Farrell, D. E., Tripp, J. H., Norgren, R., & Teyler, T. J. (1980). A study of the auditory evoked magnetic field of the human brain. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 49, 31-37.
9. Frith, C. D. (1992). The cognitive neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Hove: Erlbaum.
10. Grant, D. A., Schipper, L. M., & Ross, B. M. (1952). Effect of intertrial interval during acquisition on extinction of the conditioned eyelid response following partial reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 203-210.
11. Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Knuutila, J., & Lounasmaa, O. V. (1993). Magnetoencephalography - Theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Reviews of Modern Physics, 65, 413-497.
12. Hari, R., Aittoniemi, K., Järvinen, M.-L., Katila, T., & Varpula, T. (1980). Auditory evoked transient and sustained magnetic fields of the human brain. Localization of neural generators. Experimental Brain Research, 40, 237-240.
13. Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75, 800-802.
14. Holland, B. S., & Copenhaver, M. (1998). Improved Bonferroni-type multiple testing procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 145-149.
15. Hommel, G. (1988). A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika, 75, 383-386.
16. Houde, J. F., Nagarajan, S. S., Sekihara, K., & Merzenich, M. M. (2002). Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: An MEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1125-1138. (Pubitemid 35305819)
17. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Martikainen, M. H., Ken-ichi, K., & Hari, R. (2005). Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 299-302.
19. Picton, T. W., Alain, C., Woods, D. L., John, M. S., Scherg, M., Valdes-Sossa, P., et al. (1999). Intracerebral sources of human auditory-evoked potentials. Audiology & Neuro-otology, 4, 64-79.
20. Prokasy, W. F. J., Grant, D. A., & Myers, N. A. (1958). Eyelid conditioning as a function of unconditioned stimulus intensity and intertrial interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 242-246.
21. Reite, M., Adams, M., Simon, J., Teale, P., Sheeder, J., Richardson, D., et al. (1994). Auditory M100 component 1: Relationship to Heschl's gyri. Brain Research, Cognitive Brain Research, 2, 13-20.
22. Ritter, W., Vaughan, H. G., Jr., & Costa, L. D. (1968). Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: A study of short term changes in average evoked responses. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 25, 550-556.
23. Schafer, E. W. P., & Marcus, M. M. (1973). Self-stimulation alters human sensory brain responses. Science, 181, 175-177.
24. Spence, K. W., & Norris, E. B. (1950). Eyelid conditioning as a function of the inter-trial interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 716-720.
25. Sperry, R. W. (1950). Neural basis of spontaneous optokinetic responses produced by visual inversion. Journal of Computational Physiology and Psychology, 43, 482-489.
26. Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., & John, E. R. (1965). Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150, 1187-1188.
27. Sutton, S., Tueting, P., Zubin, J., & John, E. R. (1967). Information delivery and sensory evoked potential. Science, 155, 1436-1439.
28. von Holst, E. (1954). Relationship between the current nervous system and the peripheral organs. British Journal of Animal Behaviour, 2, 89-94.
29. Whitney, D., & Murakami, I. (1998). Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 656-657.
30. Whitney, D., Murakami, I., & Cavanagh, P. (2000). Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Research, 40, 137-149.
31. Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 209-216.
32. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269, 1880-1882.
33. Yeo, A. (1976). The acquisition of conditioned emotional response as a function of intertrial interval. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 449-458.