Somatosensory basis of speech production

Nature

Volumn 423, Issue 6942, 2003, Pages 866-869

  Tremblay, Stéphanie ^a   Shiller, Douglas M ^a   Ostry, David J ^a,b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; FEEDBACK; LOADS (FORCES); SENSORY PERCEPTION; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

SOMATOSENSORY INPUTS;

BIOCOMMUNICATIONS;

SOUND PROPAGATION; VOCALIZATION;

ACOUSTICS; ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; JAW; MECHANICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; SPEECH;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; FEEDBACK; HEARING; HUMANS; JAW; MOVEMENT; ROBOTICS; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SPEECH; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

EID: 0038480252     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature01710     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Guenther, F. H., Hampson, M. & Johnson, D. A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. Psychol. Rev. 105, 611-633 (1998).
2. Guenther, F. H. et al. Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 2854-2865 (1999).
3. Houde, J. F. & Jordan, M. I. Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science 279, 1213-1216 (1998).
4. Jones, J. A. & Munhall, K. G. Perceptual calibration of F0 production: Evidence from feedback perturbation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1246-1251 (2000).
5. Perkell, J. S., Matthies, M. L., Svirsky M. A. & Jordan, M. I. Trading relations between tongue-body raising and lip rounding in production of the vowel /u/: A pilot "motor equivalence" study. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2948-2961 (1993).
6. Perkell, J. S. & Nelson, W. L. Variability in production of the vowels /i/ and /a/. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 1889-1895 (1985).
7. Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49, 155-180 (1992).
8. Guenther, F. H. Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production. Psychol. Rev. 102, 594-621 (1995).
9. Saltzman, E. L. & Munhall, K. G. A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecol. Psychol. 1, 333-382 (1989).
10. Hamlet, S. L. & Stone, M. L. Compensatory vowel characteristics resulting from the presence of different types of experimental dental protheses. J. Phonet. 4, 199-218 (1976).
11. Lindblom, B., Lubker, J. & Gay, T. Formant frequencies of some fixed-mandible vowels and a model of speech motor programming by predictive simulation. J. Phonet. 7, 147-161 (1979).
12. McFarland, D., Baum, S. R. & Chabot, C. Speech compensation to structural modifications of the oral cavity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 1093-1104 (1996).
13. McFarland, D. & Baum, S. R. Incomplete compensation to articulatory perturbation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1865-1873 (1995).
14. Savariaux, C., Perrier, P. & Orliaguet, J. P. Compensation strategies for the perturbation of the rounded vowel [u] using a lip tube: A study of the control of space in speech production. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 2428-2442 (1995).
15. Gandolfo, F., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. & Bizzi, I. Motor learning by field approximation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 3843-3846 (1996).
16. Goodbody, S. J. & Wolpert, D. M. Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning. J. Neurophysiol. 79, 1825-1838 (1998).
17. Lackner, J. R. & Dizio, P. Rapid adaptation to coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J. Neurophysiol. 72, 299-313 (1994).
18. Shadmehr, R. & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J. Neurosci. 14, 3208-3224 (1994).
19. Thoroughman, K. A. & Shadmehr, R. Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407, 742-747 (2000).
20. Bernstein, L. R. & Trahiotis, C. Detection of interaural delay in high-frequency noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 147-152 (1982).