Meeting teachers' real needs: New tools in the secondary modern foreign languages classroom

Interactive Whiteboards for Education: Theory, Research and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 69-85

  Gray, Carol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855576661     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-715-2.ch005     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Banner, G., & Rayner, S. (2002). Learning language and learning style: Principles, process and practice. Language Learning Journal, 21, 37-44. doi:10.1080/09571730085200091
2. Beastall, L. (2006). Enchanting a disenchanted child: Revolutionizing the means of education using information technology and e-learning. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(1), 97-110. doi:10.1080/01425690500376758
3. BECTA. (2003a). ICT and pedagogy: A review of the research literature. National Grid for Learning Research & Evaluation Series, Report No. 19. London: DfES/BECTA. Retrieved January 29, from http://www.becta.org.uk/resarch/reports
4. BECTA. (2003b). What the research says about interactive whiteboards. BECTA. Retrieved January 29, 2004, from http://www.becta.org.uk/research/reports
5. BECTA. (2004). Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard: A guide for secondary schools. Coventry, UK: BECTA.
6. BECTA. (2007). Harnessing technology review 2007: Progress and impact of technology in education. Summary report. Coventry, UK: BECTA. Retrieved February 11, 2008, from http://www.becta.org.uk/research/
7. Boag-Munro, G. (2005). 'The naming of cats is a difficult matter' - how far are government and teachers using the same words to talk about educational concepts? In J. Satterthwaite & E. Atkinson (Eds.), Discourses of education in the age of new imperialism (pp. 131-150). Stoke on Trent, UK: Trentham Books.
8. Bruton, S. (2005). Task-based language learning: For the state secondary FL classroom? Language Learning Journal, 31, 55-68. doi:10.1080/09571730585200091
9. Burns, C., & Myhill, D. (2004). Interactive or inactive? A consideration of the nature of interaction in whole class teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(1), 35-49. doi:10.1080/0305764042000183115
10. Conlon, T. (2004). A failure of delivery: The United Kingdom's new opportunities fund programme of teacher training in information and communications technology. Journal of In-service Education, 30(1), 115-139. doi:10.1080/13674580400200286
11. Davies, G., & Rendall, H. (2004). ICT4LT module 1:4. Introduction to computer assisted language learning (CALL). Retrieved January 29, 2004 from http://www.ict4lt.org/en/en_mod1-4.htm
12. Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Hennessy, S. (2006). Teachers' developing 'practical theories' of the contribution of information and communication technologies to subject teaching and learning: an analysis of cases from English secondary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 459-480. doi:10.1080/01411920600635460
13. DfEE. (1998a). Circular 4/98 teaching: high status, high standards. London: DfEE
14. DfEE. (1998b). Initial teacher training National Curriculum for the use of information and communications technology in subject teaching. DfEE Circular 4/98, Annexe B. London: DfEE.
15. DfEE. (1998c). The national literacy strategy: A framework for teaching. London: DfEE
16. DfEE. (1998d). The national numeracy strategy: A framework for teaching. London: DfEE
17. DfES. (2001). The key stage 3 national strategy. London: DfES.
18. DfES. (2002). Transforming the way we learn: A vision for the future of ICT in schools. DfES Report No: 0008/2002. London: DfES.
19. DfES (2003). The key stage 3 national strategy. Framework for teaching modern languages: Years 7, 8 and 9. London: DfES.
20. DfES. (2005). Harnessing technology: Transforming learning and children's services. London: DfES.
21. DfES. (2007). Teaching and learning in 2020 Review. DfES Report No: 6856/2007. London: DfES.
22. Driessen, G., Smit, F., & Sleegers, P. (2005). Parental involvement and educational achievement. British Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 509-532. doi:10.1080/01411920500148713
23. Field, K. (Ed.). (2000). Issues in modern foreign languages teaching. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
24. Fisher, T. (2006). Educational transformation: Is it, like 'beauty', in the eye of the beholder, or will we know it when we see it? Education and Information Technologies, 11(3-4), 293-303. doi:10.1007/s10639-006-9009-1
25. Galàn, J. G., & Blanco, S. M. (2004). Design of educational web pages. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 99-103. doi:10.1080/0261976042000211793
26. Gill, C. (2000). Improving MFL learning through ICT. Dunstable & Dublin. Ireland: Folens Limited.
27. Goodison, T. (2003). Integrating ICT in the classroom: A case study of two contrasting lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5), 549-566. doi:10.1046/j.0007-1013.2003.00350.x
28. Gray, C., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilkington, R., & Tomkins, S. (2005). The pros and cons of interactive whiteboards in relation to the key stage 3 strategy and framework. Language Learning Journal, 32, 38-44. doi:10.1080/09571730585200171
29. Gray, C., Pilkington, R., Hagger-Vaughan, L., & Tomkins, S. (2007). Integrating ICT into classroom practice in modern foreign language teaching in England: Making room for teachers' voices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30(4), 407-429. doi:10.1080/02619760701664193
30. Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 102-117. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00118.x
31. Hall, K., Collins, J., Benjamin, S., Nind, M., & Sheehy, K. (2004). SATurated models of pupildom: assessment and inclusion/exclusion. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 801-817. doi:10.1080/0141192042000279512
32. Harris, V. (1998). Making boys make progress. Language Learning Journal, 18, 56-62. doi:10.1080/09571739885200271
33. Harrison, C., Comber, C., Fisher, T., Haw, K., Lewin, C., Lunzer, E., et al. (2002). ImpaCT2. The impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment. (ICT in Schools Research and Evaluation Series No. 7). London: DfES/BECTA.
34. Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35. Heilbronn, R. (2004). The national strategy for key stage 3 and its application to modern foreign language teaching. Language Learning Journal, 30, 42-49. doi:10.1080/09571730485200221
36. International Certificate Conference (2003). The impact of information and communications technologies on the teaching of foreign languages and on the role of teachers of foreign languages. A report commissioned by the Directorate General of Education & Culture. Retrieved February 26, 2004, from http://icc-europe.com/ICT_in_FLT_Final_Report_Jan2003/ICT_in_FLT_in_Europe.pdf
37. Ireson, J., Mortimore, P., & Hallam, S. (2002). What do we know about effective pedagogy? In Moon, B., Shelton Mayes, A., & Hutchinson, S. (Eds.), Teaching, learning and the curriculum in secondary school: A reader (pp. 64-69). London, New York: Open University/Routledge Falmer.
38. Jones, B., & Jones, G. (2001). Boys' performance in modern foreign languages. Listening to learners. London: CILT.
39. Jones, J., & Coffey, S. (2006). Modern foreign languages 5-11: A guide for teachers. London: David Fulton.
40. Kennewell, S., Parkinson, J., & Tanner, H. (Eds.). (2003). Learning to teach ICT in the secondary school. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
41. Laurillard, D. (1997). The TELL consortium - formative evaluation report. Hull, UK: University of Hull. Retrieved January 29, 2004, from http://www.hull.ac.uk/cti/tell/eval.htm
42. Lawes, S. (2000). Why learn a foreign language? In Field, K. (Ed.), Issues in modern foreign languages teaching (pp. 41-51). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
43. Lightbown, P. M. (2003). Second language acquisition research in the classroom/second language acquisition research from the classroom. Language Learning Journal, 28, 4-13. doi:10.1080/09571730385200151
44. Lodge, A. (2000). Higher Education. In Green, S. (Ed.), New perspectives on teaching and learning modern languages (pp. 105-123). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
45. McCarney, J. (2004). Effective models of staff development in ICT. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 61-72. doi:10.1080/0261976042000211801
46. Mitchell, R. (2000). Research, inspection and teacher education: The quest for a consensus on effective MFLs pedagogy. Links (New York, N.Y.), 21, 5-12.
47. Moss, G., Jewitt, C., Levaãic, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., & Castle, F. (2007). The interactive whiteboards, pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: An evaluation of the schools whiteboard expansion (SWE) project: London challenge. DfES Research Report RR 816. London: DfES.
48. Munn, P., & Lloyd, G. (2005). Exclusion and excluded pupils. British Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 205-221. doi:10.1080/0141192052000340215
49. Myers, H. (2003). Case study 5: The Ashcombe School, Language College. Information and Communications Technology for Language Teaching (ICT4LT) Module 3:1. Managing a multimedia language centre. Retrieved 26 February, 2004, from http://www.ict4lt.org/en/en_mod3.1.htm
50. Office for Standards in Education. (2002). ICT in schools: the effect of government initiatives. Secondary modern foreign languages (HMI 706). London: Her Majesty's Inspectorate.
51. Office for Standards in Education. (2003). Modern foreign languages (MFL). Progress and improving boys' achievement in modern foreign languages. Ofsted subject reports conference series 2002/2003 (HMI 1641). London: Her Majesty's Inspectorate.
52. Office for Standards in Education. (2004). ICT in schools - the impact of government initiatives. Secondary modern foreign languages. HMI 2191. London: Her Majesty's Inspectorate.
53. Office for Standards in Education. (2005). Embedding ICT in schools - a dual evaluation exercise. London: Office for Standards in Education.
54. Ollin, R. (2005). Professionals, poachers or streetlevel bureaucrats: government policy, teaching identities and constructive subversions. In J. Satterthwaite & E. Atkinson (Eds.), Discourses of education in the age of new imperialism (pp. 151-162). Stoke on Trent, UK: Trentham Books.
55. Parry, J. (2004). Pupil authors and teacher innovators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 83-98. doi:10.1080/0261976042000211810
56. Pilkington, R., & Gray, C. (2004). Embedding ICT in the modern foreign language curriculum: pedagogy into practice. In Cook, J. (Ed.), Research proceedings of ALT-C 2004. Blue skies and pragmatism (pp. 270-283). Exeter, UK: ALT-C.
57. Pinar, W. (2005). Curriculum studies and the politics of educational reform. In J. Satterthwaite & E. Atkinson (Eds.), Discourses of education in the age of new imperialism (pp. 25-46). Stoke on Trent, UK: Trentham Books.
58. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
59. Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 443-457. doi:10.1080/01411920600635452
60. Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2007). Gender inequality in the primary classroom: Will interactive whiteboards help? Gender and Education, 19(4), 455-469. doi:10.1080/09540250701442658
61. Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91-101. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00117.x
62. Somekh, B., Haldane, M., Jones, K., Lewin, C., Steadman, S., & Scrimshaw, P. (2007). Evaluation of the primary schools whiteboard expansion project. Report to the DfES. Manchester, UK: Manchester Metropolitan University.
63. Tanner, H., & Jones, S. (2007). Using videostimulated reflective dialogue to learn from children about their learning with and without ICT. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(3), 321-335. doi:10.1080/14759390701614454
64. Teacher Training Agency. (1999). The use of information and communications technology in subject teaching. Identification of needs: Secondary modern foreign languages. TTA 13/3/1999. London: Teacher Training Agency.
65. Van Essen, A. (2002). A historical perspective. In M. Grenfell (Ed.) (2002). Modern languages across the curriculum (pp. 10-25). London & New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
66. Walker, R. J. (2004). The review project. Hull, UK: The University of Hull. Retrieved February 26, 2004, from http://www.thereviewproject.org/
67. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogical inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.