Does family make a difference? Mid-term effects of a school/home-based intervention program to enhance reading motivation

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 79-91

  Villiger, Caroline ^a   Niggli, Alois ^a   Wandeler, Christian ^b   Kutzelmann, Sabine ^c  

^a University of Teacher Training   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

^c University of Teacher Training   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Family literacy; Intervention study; Reading comprehension; Reading motivation; School

Indexed keywords

EID: 83555173272     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Almasi J.F. Research-based comprehension practices that create higher-level discussions. Improving comprehension instruction 2002, 229-242. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. C. Collins Block, L.B. Gambrell, M. Pressley (Eds.).
2. Baker L. The role of parents in motivating struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly 2003, 19(1):87-106. 10.1080/10573560308207.
3. Baker L., Mackler K., Sonnenschein S., Serpell R. Parents' interactions with their first-grade children during storybook reading and relations with subsequent home reading activity and reading achievement. Journal of School Psychology 2001, 39(5):415-438.
4. Baker L., Scher D., Mackler K. Home and family influences on motivations for reading. Educational Psychologist 1997, 32(2):69-82. 10.1207/s15326985ep3202_2.
5. Baumert J., Köller O. Lernstrategien und schulische Leistungen. Emotionen, Kognitionen und Schulleistung 1996, 137-154. PsychologieVerlagsUnion, Weinheim, Germany. J. Möller, O. Köller (Eds.).
6. Baumert J., Watermann R., Schümer G. Disparitäten der Bildungsbeteiligung und des Kompetenzerwerbs: Ein institutionelles und individuelles Mediationsmodell. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 2003, 6(1):46-72. 10.1007/s11618-003-0004-7.
7. Berger J.-L., Karabenick S.A. Motivation and students' use of learning strategies: evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classroom. Learning & Instruction 2011, 21:416-428. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.06.002.
8. Bliese P.D. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis. Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations 2000, 349-381. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. K.J. Klein, S.W. Kozlowski (Eds.).
9. Bonerad, E.-M., & Möller, J. (2005). Ein Modell der Lesemotivation [A model of reading motivation]. Paper presented at the 67th meeting of the Arbeitsgruppe für empirische pädagogische Forschung (AEPF), Salzburg, Austria.
10. Caplan G. Support systems and community mental health 1974, Behavioral Publications, New York, NY.
11. Chapman J.W., Tunmer W.E. A longitudinal study of beginning reading achievement and reading self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology 1997, 67:279-291.
12. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Handbook of self-determination research 2002, University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY.
13. Deci E.L., Vallerand R.J., Pelletier L.G., Ryan R.M. Motivation and education: the self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist 1991, 26(3/4):325-346. 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_6.
14. DeVries D., Mescon I.T. Teams-games-tournament: an effective task and reward structure in the elementary grades (Tech. Rep. No. 189) 1975, Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools, Baltimore, MD.
15. Eccles J.S., Wigfield A. Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology 2002, 53:109-132. 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.
16. Elbaum B., Vaughn S. School-based interventions to enhance the self-concept of students with learning disabilities: a meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal 2001, 101:303-329. 10.1086/499670.
17. Elbaum B., Vaughn S. For which students with learning disabilities are self-concept interventions effective?. Journal of Learning Disabilities 2003, 36(2):101-108. 10.1177/002221940303600203.
18. Epstein J.L. School and family partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools 2001, Westview, Boulder, CO.
19. Gambrell L.B., Codling R.M., Palmer B.M. Elementary students' motivation to read (Research Rep. No. 52) 1996, National Reading Research Center, Athens, GA.
20. Gottfried A.E., Fleming J.S., Gottfried A.W. Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: a longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology 2001, 93(1):3-13. 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3.
21. Gottfried A.E., Marcoulides G.A., Gottfried A.W., Oliver P.H. A latent curve model of parental motivational practices and developmental decline in math and science academic intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 101(3):729-739. 10.1037/a0015084.
22. Griffith L.W., Rasinski T.V. A focus on fluency: how one teacher incorporated fluency with her reading curriculum. The Reading Teacher 2004, 58(2):126-137. 10.1598/RT.58.2.1.
23. Groeben N., Schroeder S. Versuch einer Synopse: Sozialisationsinstanzen - Ko-Konstruktion. Lesesozialisation in der Mediengesellschaft. Ein Forschungsüberblick 2004, 306-348. Juventa, Weinheim, Germany. N. Groeben, B. Hurrelmann (Eds.).
24. Grolnick W.S. The psychology of parental control. How well-meant parenting backfires 2003, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
25. Guthrie J.T., Wigfield A., Perencevich K.C. Motivating reading comprehension. Concept-oriented reading instruction 2004, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
26. Guthrie J.T., Hoa L.W., Wigfield A., Tonks S.M., Perencevich K.C. From spark to fire: can situational reading interest lead to long-term reading motivation?. Reading Research and Instruction 2006, 45(2):91-117.
27. Guthrie J.T., McRae A., Klauda S.L. Contributions of concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading. Educational Psychologist 2007, 42(4):237-250.
28. Helmke A. Leistungssteigerung und Ausgleich von Leistungsunterschieden in Schulklassen: Unvereinbare Ziele?. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und pädagogische Psychologie 1988, 20(1):44-76.
29. Hidi S., Renninger K. The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist 2006, 41(2):111-127. 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4.
30. Jacobs J.E., Lanza S., Osgood D.W., Eccles J.S., Wigfield A. Changes in children's self-competence and values: gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development 2002, 73(2):509-527. 10.1111/1467-8624.00421.
31. King A. Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist 1992, 27(1):111-126. 10.1207/s15326985ep2701_8.
32. King G., Honaker J., Joseph A., Scheve K. Analyzing incomplete political science data: an alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review 2001, 95(1):49-69.
33. Klauda S.L. The role of parents in adolescents' reading motivation and activity. Educational Psychology Review 2009, 21:325-363. 10.1007/s10648-009-9112-0.
34. Krapp A. Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction 2002, 12(4):383-409. 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1.
35. Krapp A. Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction 2005, 15:381-395. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.007.
36. Lenhard W., Schneider W. ELFE 1-6. Ein Leseverständnistest für Erst- bis Sechstklässler 2006, Hogrefe, Göttingen, Germany.
37. Leseman P.P.M., de Jong P.F. Home literacy: opportunity, instruction, cooperation and social-emotional quality predicting early reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly 1998, 33(3):294-318. 10.1598/RRQ.33.3.3.
38. Lou Y., Abrami P.C., d'Apollonia S. Small group and individual learning with technology: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 2001, 71(3):449-521. 10.3102/00346543071003449.
39. Lou Y., Abrami P.C., Spence J.C., Poulsen C., Chambers B., d'Apollonia S. Within-class grouping. A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 1996, 66(4):423-458.
40. McCrudden M.T., Perkins P.G., Putney L.G. Self-efficacy and interest in the use of reading strategies. Journal of Research in Childhood Education 2005, 20(2):119-131. 10.1080/02568540509594556.
41. McElvany N. Förderung von Lesekompetenz im Kontext der Familie 2008, Waxmann, Münster, Germany.
42. McElvany N., Artelt C. Systematic reading training in the family: development, implementation, and initial evaluation of the Berlin parent-child reading program. Learning and Instruction 2009, 19(1):79-95. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.02.002.
43. McElvany N., van Steensel R. Potentials and challenges of family literacy interventions: the question of implementation quality. European Educational Research Journal 2009, 8(3):418-433.
44. Meece J.L., Miller S.D. Changes in elementary school. Children's achievement goals for reading and writing: Results of a longitudinal and an intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading 1999, 3(3):207-229. 10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_2.
45. Mol S.E., Bus A.G., De Jong M.T., Smeets D.J.H. Added value of dialogic parent-child book readings: a meta-analysis. Early Education & Development 2008, 19:7-26.
46. Morrow L.M., Young J. A family literacy program connecting school and home: effects on attitude, motivation, and literacy achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 1997, 89(4):736-742. 10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.736.
47. Moser U., Tresch S. Best Practice in der Schule. Von erfolgreichen Lehrerinnen und Lehrern lernen 2003, Aargauer Lehrmittelverlag des Kantons AG, Buchs, Switzerland.
48. Niggli A., Trautwein U., Schnyder I., Lüdtke O., Neumann M. Elterliche Unterstützung kann hilfreich sein, aber Einmischung schadet: Familiärer Hintergrund, elterliches Hausaufgabenengagement und Leistungsentwicklung. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht 2007, 54(1):1-13.
49. Niggli A., Wandeler C., Villiger C. Globale und bereichsspezifische Komponenten eines Elterntrainings zur Betreuung bei Lesehausaufgaben: Zusammenhänge im familiären Kontext. Unterrichtswissenschaft 2009, 37(3):230-245.
50. O'Donnel A., Dansereau D.F. Scripted cooperation in student dyads: a method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. Interaction in cooperative groups. The theoretical anatomy of group learning 1992, 120-141. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, N. Miller (Eds.).
51. O'Mara A.J., Marsh H.W., Craven R.G., Debus R.L. Do self-concept interventions make a difference? A synergistic blend of construct validation and meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist 2006, 41(3):181-206. 10.1207/s15326985ep4103_4.
52. Palincsar A.S., Brown A.L. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1984, 1:117-175. 10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1.
53. Pressley M., Borkowski J.G., Schneider W. Cognitive strategies: good strategy users coordinate metacognition and knowledge. Annals of child development 1987, 89-129. JAI Press, New York, NY. R. Vasta, G. Whitehurst (Eds.).
54. Raudenbush S.W. Advancing educational policy by advancing research on instruction. American Educational Research Journal 2008, 45(1):206-230. 10.3102/0002831207312905.
55. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods 2002, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
56. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S., Cheong Y.F., Congdon R. HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling 2004, SSI (Scientific Software International), Chicago, IL.
57. Rubin D.B. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys 1987, J. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. 10.1002/9780470316696.
58. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2000, 25(1):54-67. 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
59. Samuels S.J. The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher 1997, 50:76-81.
60. Schiefele U. Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading 1999, 3(3):257-279. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_4.
61. Schiefele U., Streblow L. Motivation aktivieren. Handbuch Lernstrategien 2006, 232-247. Hogrefe, Göttingen, Germany. H. Mandl, H.F. Friedrich (Eds.).
62. Schraw G., Flowerday T., Lehman S. Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review 2001, 13(3):211-224. 10.1023/A:1016619705184.
63. Schunk D.H., Rice J.M. Learning goals and progress feedback during reading comprehension instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior 1991, 23(3):351-364.
64. Schunk D.H., Zimmerman B.J. Self-regulation in learning. Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology 2003, Vol. 7:59-78. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. W.M. Reynolds, G.E. Miller (Eds.).
65. Sénéchal M., Young L. The effect of family literacy interventions on children's acquisition of reading from kindergarten to grade 3: a meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research 2008, 78(4):880-907. 10.3102/0034654308320319.
66. Shadish W.R., Cook T.D., Campbell D.T. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference 2002, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
67. Slavin R.E. A reader's guide to scientifically based research. Educational Leadership 2003, 60(5):12-16.
68. Slavin R.E. Cooperative learning. Theory, research and practice 2005, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
69. Sonnenschein S., Munsterman K. The influence of home-based reading interactions on 5-year-olds' reading motivations and early literacy development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 2002, 17:318-337. 10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00167-9.
70. Souvignier E., Mokhlesgerami J. Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction 2006, 16:57-71. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.12.006.
71. van Dijk T.A., Kintsch W. Strategies of discourse comprehension 1983, Academic Press, London, UK.
72. van Steensel R., McElvany N., Kurvers J., Herppich S. How effective are family literacy programs? Results of a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 2011, 81:69-96.
73. Villiger C., Niggli A., Wandeler C. Fördern statt einmischen: Evaluation eines Kurzzeit-Elterntrainings zur Betreuung von Lesehausaufgaben. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht 2010, 57:257-272. 10.2378/peu2010.art18d.
74. Wang M., Haertel G., Walberg H.J. Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research 1993, 51(4):74-79.
75. Wigfield A., Guthrie J.T. Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology 1997, 89(3):420-432. 10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420.
76. Worthy J., Prater K. "I thought about it all night": readers theatre for reading fluency and motivation. The Reading Teacher 2002, 56(3):294-297.