Contributions of concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 237-250

  Guthrie, John T ^a   McRae, Angela ^a   Klauda, Susan Lutz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37649018192     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00461520701621087     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Almasi, J. F. (1995). The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 314-351.
2. Applebee, A., Langer, J., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussionbased approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 685-730.
3. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261-278.
4. Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children's motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452-477.
5. Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. ( 1991 ). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development (pp. 43-77). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Flowerday, T., & Schraw, G., (2000). Teacher beliefs about instructional choice: A phenomenological study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 634-645.
7. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
8. Gnaldi, M., Schagen, I., Twist, L., & Morrison, J. (2005). Attitude items and low ability students: The need for a cautious approach to interpretation. Educational Studies, 31, 103-113.
9. Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 631-645.
10. Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 525-538.
11. Guthrie, J. T., & Coddington, C. (2007). A framework for avoidance and approach motivations to reading for African American and Caucasian students. Manuscript in preparation.
12. Guthrie, J. T., & Humenick, N. M. (2004). Motivating students to read: Evidence for classroom practices that increase reading motivation and achievement. In. P. McCardle & V Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 329-354). Baltimore: Brookes.
13. Guthrie, J. T., & McCann, A. D. (1997). Characteristics of classrooms that promote motivations and strategies for learning. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 128-148). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
14. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Reading research handbook (Vol. III, pp. 403-424). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N. M., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., & Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of stimulating tasks on reading motivation and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 232-245.
16. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Scaffolding for motivation and engagement in reading. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: ConceptOriented Reading Instruction (pp. 55-86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Von Seeker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 331-341.
18. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic.
19. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. London: Sage.
20. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19, 119-137.
21. Meece, J., Anderman, E., & Anderman, L. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487-503.
22. Meece, J., & Miller, S. (1999). Changes in elementary children's achievement goals for reading and writing: Results of a longitudinal and an intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 207-229.
23. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J. , & Kennedy, A. M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 international report: IEA 's study of reading literacy achievement in primary schools. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
24. Ng, M. M., Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., McCann, A., & Alao, S. (1998). How classroom characteristics influence intrinsic motivations for literacy. Reading Psychology, 19, 319-398.
25. Perie, M., Grigg, W., & Donahue, P. (2005). The nation s report card: Reading 2005 (U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics, NCES 2006-451). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26. Pintrich, P. (2000). An achievement-goal perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
27. Purcell-Gates, V., Duke, N., & Martineau, J. (2007). Learning to read and write genre-specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 8-46
28. Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 209-218.
29. Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students' engagement by increasing teachers' autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147-169.
30. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
31. Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19, 159-172.
32. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Developing self-efficacious readers and writers: The role of social and self-regulatory processes. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 34-50). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
33. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and students engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581.
34. Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 22-32.
35. Smith, M. W., & Wilhelm, J. D. (2002). Reading don't fix no Chevy's. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
36. Souvignier, E., & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 16, 57-71.
37. Sweet, A. P., Guthrie, J. T., & Ng, M. M. (1998). Teacher perceptions and student reading motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 210-223.
38. Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. Elementary School Journal, 104, 3-28.
39. Twist, L., Gnaldi, M., Schagen, I., & Morrison, J. (2004). Good readers but at a cost? Attitudes to reading in England. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 387-400.
40. Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Monitoring learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246-260.
41. Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Matos, L. (2005). Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal framing and autonomy-supportive versus internally controlling communication style on early adolescents' academic achievement. Child Development, 76, 483-501.
42. Wentzel, K. R. (2005). Peer relationships, motivation, and academic performance at school. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 279-296). New York: Guilford Publications.
43. Wigfield A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Motivation for reading: Individual, home, textual, and classroom perspective. Educational Psychologist, 32, 57-135.
44. Wiske, M. S. (1998). What is teaching for understanding? In M. S. Wiske (Ed.), Teaching for understanding (pp. 61-86). San Francisco: JosseyBass.