Anatomy of interaction experience: Distinguishing sensory, semantic, and behavioral dimensions of interactivity

New Media and Society

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1320-1335

  Sohn, Dongyoung ^a  

^a Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

communication; interaction experience; interactivity; perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 83055181942     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444811405806     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bagozzi RP (1975) Marketing as exchange. Journal of Marketing 39(4): 32-39.
2. Banks WP and Kajicek D (1991) Perception. Annual Review of Psychology 42: 305-331.
3. Bucy EP (2004) Interactivity in society: Locating an elusive concept. The Information Society 20(5): 373-383.
4. Burgoon JK, Ramirez A, Dunbar NE, Kam K and Fischer J (2002) Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication 52(3): 657-677.
5. Coyle JR and Thorson E (2001) The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising 30(3): 65-77.
6. Culnan MJ and Markus ML (1987) Information Technologies. In: Jablin FM, Putnam LL, Roberts KH and Porter LW (eds) Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 420-430.
7. Deft RL and Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural determinants. Management Science 32(5): 554-571.
8. Downes EJ and McMillan SJ (2000) Defining interactivity: A qualitative identification of key dimensions. New Media and Society 2(2): 157-179.
9. Eveland WP (2003) A 'mix of attributes' approach to the study of media effects and new communication technologies. Journal of Communication 53(3): 395-410.
10. Fortin DR and Dholakia RR (2005) Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research 58(3): 387-396.
11. Gibson JJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
12. Giles DC (2002) Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology 4(3): 279-305.
13. Goffman E (1957) Alienation from interaction. Human Relations 10(1): 47-59.
14. Ha L and James EL (1998) Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business web sites. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 42(4): 457-469.
15. Heeter C (2000) Interactivity in the context of designed experiences. Journal of Interactive Advertising 1(1): 4-15.
16. Helbig HB, Graf M and Kiefer M (2006) The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research 174(2): 221-228.
17. Hoffman DL and Novak TP (1996) Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations. Journal of Marketing 60(3): 50-68.
18. Horton D and Wohl RR (1956) Mass communication and parasocial interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry 19(3): 215-229.
19. Johnson GJ, Bruner GC II and Kumar A (2006) Interactivity and its facets revisited. Journal of Advertising 35(4): 35-52.
20. Kiousis S (2002) Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media & Society 4(3): 355-383.
21. Leiner DJ and Quiring O (2008) What Interactivity Means to the User: Essential Insights into and a Scale for Perceived Interactivity. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 14(1): 127-155.
22. Liu Y (2003) Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites. Journal of Advertising Research 43(2): 207-216.
23. Lombard M and Snyder-Duch J (2001) Interactive advertising and presence: A framework. Journal of Interactive Advertising 1(2): 56-65.
24. McMillan SJ and Hwang J-S (2002) Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising 31(3): 29-42.
25. Milner AD and Goodale MA (1995) The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Moon Y and Nass C (1996) How 'real' are computer personalities? Communication Research 23(6): 651-674.
27. Morrison MA (1998) A Look at Interactivity from a Consumer Perspective. In: Ford JB and Honecutt EJD (eds) Developments in Marketing Science. Academy of Marketing Science, 149-154.
28. Newhagen JE (2004) Interactivity, dynamic symbol processing, and the emergence of content in human communication. Information Society 20(5): 395-400.
29. Norman DA (1988) The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Doubleday.
30. Papacharissi Z and Rubin AM (2000) Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44(2): 175-196.
31. Perse EM and Rubin RB (1989) Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Communication Research 16(1): 59-77.
32. Quiring O (2009) What do users associate with 'interactivity'? A qualitative study on user schemata. New Media & Society 11(6): 899-920.
33. Quiring O and Schweiger W (2008) Interactivity: A review of the concept and a framework for analysis. Communications 33(2): 147-167.
34. Rafaeli S (1988) Interactivity: From new media to communication. In: Hawkins RP and Wiemann JM (eds) Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 110-134.
35. Rafaeli S and Ariel Y (2007) Assessing Interactivity in Computer-mediated Research. In: Joinson A, McKenna K, Postmes T and Reips U (eds) The Oxford Handbook of internet Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 71-88.
36. Rafaeli S and Sudweeks F (1997) Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 2(4). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html (consulted February 2009).
37. Reeves B and Nass C (1996) The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Roth I and Bruce V (1986) Perception and Representation: Current Issues. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
39. Short J, Williams E and Christie B (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: Wiley.
40. Sicilia M, Ruiz S and Munuera JL (2005) Effects of interactivity in a web site. Journal of Advertising 34(3): 31-45.
41. Sohn D, Ci C and Lee B-K (2007) The moderating effects of expectation on the patterns of the interactivity-attitude relationship. Journal of Advertising 36(3): 261-271.
42. Steuer J (1992) Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication 42(4): 73-93.
43. Stromer-Galley J (2004) Interactivity-as-product and interactivity-as-process. The Information Society 20(5): 391-394.
44. Sundar S (2004) Theorizing interactivity's effects. The Information Society 20(5): 385-389.
45. Sundar S (2007) Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction. In: Joinson A, McKenna K, Postmes T and Reips U (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 89-102.
46. Sundar S and Kim J (2005) Interactivity and persuasion: Influencing attitudes with information and involvement. Journal of Interactive Advertising 5(2): 5-18.
47. Sundar S, Kalyanaraman S and Brown J (2003) Explicating interactivity: Impression-formation effects in political campaign sites. Communication Research 30(1): 30-59.
48. Tucker M and Ellis R (2004) Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica 116(2): 185-203.
49. Turner JH (1988) A Theory of Social Interaction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
50. Vakratsas D and Ambler T (1999) How advertising works: What do we really know? Journal of Marketing 63(1): 26-43.
51. Walther JB, Gay G and Hancock JT (2005) How do communication and technology researchers study the internet? Journal of Communication 55(3): 632-657.
52. Warnick B, Xenos M, Endres D and Gastil J (2005) Effects of campaign-to-user and text-based interactivity in political candidate campaign web sites. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 10(3). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/warnick.html (consulted March 2010).
53. Wu G (1999) Perceived interactivity and attitude toward website. In: Roberts MS (ed.) Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, 254-262.
54. Zack MH (1993) Interactivity and communication mode choice in ongoing management groups. Information Systems Research 4(3): 207-239.