Interactivity-as-product and interactivity-as-process

Information Society

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 391-394

  Stromer Galley, Jennifer ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Human computer interaction; Interactivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 7544251122     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01972240490508081     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Agre, Philip. 2002. Real-time politics: The Internet and the political process. The Information Society 18(5):311-331.
2. Bretz, Rudy. 1983. Media for interactive communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Bucy, Erik P. 2004. Interactivity in society: Towards a theory of an elusive concept. Paper presented at the 54th annual conference of the International Communication Association, May, New Orleans, LA.
4. Bucy, Erik P., and Gregson, Kimberly S. 2001. Media, participation: A legitimizing mechanism of mass democracy. New Media & Society 3:359-382.
5. Bucy, Erik P., Lang, Annie, Potter, Robert F., and Grabe, Maria E. 1999. Formal features of Cyberspace: Relationships between web page complexity and site traffic. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50:1246-1256.
6. Davis, Richard. 1999. The web of politics: The Internet's impact on the American political system. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Hacker, Kenneth L. 1996. Missing links in the evolution of electronic democratization. Media, Culture and Society 18:213-232.
8. Haeckel, S. H. 1998. About the nature and future of interactive marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing 12(1):63-71.
9. Heeter, Carrie. 1989. Implications of new interactive technologies for conceptualizing communication. In Media use in the information age: Emerging patterns of adoption and computer use, eds. J. L. Salvaggio and J. Bryant, pp. 217-235. Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Lee, Jae-Shin. 2000. Interactivity: A new approach. Paper read at Association of Educators of Journalism and Mass Communications, August, Phoenix, AZ.
11. McMillan, Sally J. 2002. Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: Users, documents, and systems. In The handbook of new media, ed. S. Livingstone, pp. 163-182. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Rafaeli, Sheizaf. 1988. Interactivity: From new media to to communication. In Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes, eds. R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann, and S. Pingree, pp. 110-134. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Rafaeli, Sheizaf, and Sudweeks, Fay. 1998. Interactivity on the nets. In Network & netplay, ed. S. Rafaeli, pp. 173-190. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Stromer-Galley, Jennifer. 2000. On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication 50(4):111-132.
15. Sundar, S. Shyam. 2000. Multimedia effects on processing and perception of online news: A study of picture, audio, and video downloads. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 3:480-499.
16. Sundar, S. Shyam, Kalyanaraman, Sriram, and Brown, Justin. 2003. Explicating web site interactivity: Impression formation effects in political campaign sites. Communication Research 30(1):30-59.
17. Wiener, Norbert. 1948. Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge, MA: MTT Press.