Interactivity: a review of the concept and a framework for analysis

Communications

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 147-167

  Quiring, Oliver ^a   Schweiger, Wolfgang ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Framework; Human machine interaction; Interactivity; Internet; Media use

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450161438     PISSN: 03412059     EISSN: 16134087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/COMMUN.2008.009     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Bezjian-Avery, A., Calder, B., and Iacobucci, D. (1998). New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 38, 23-32
2. Bierig, J. and Dimmick, J. (1979). The late night radio talkshow as interpersonal communication. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 92-96
3. Biocca, F. (1993). Communication research in the design of communication interfaces and systems. Journal of Communication, 43, 59-68
4. Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
5. Brody, E. W. (1990). Communication tomorrow: New audiences, new technologies. New Media. New York: Praeger
6. Carey, J. (1989). Interactive media. In E. Barnouw (Ed.), International encyclopedia of communications (pp. 328-330). New York: Oxford University Press
7. Coyle, J. R. and Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30, 65-77
8. Davies, H. and Rarick, G. (1964). Functions of editorials and letters to the editor. Journalism Quarterly, 41, 108-109
9. Durlak, J. T. (1987). A typology for interactive media. In M.L. McLaughlin. (Ed.), Communication yearbook, 10 (pp.743-757). Newbury Park: Erlbaum
10. Forsythe, C, Grose, E., and Ratner, J. (Eds.) (1998). Human factors and web development. Mahwah, NJ, London: Erlbaum
11. Forsythe, S. A. (1950). An exploratory study of letters to the editor and their contributors. Journalism Quarterly, 14, 143-144
12. Gans, H. J. (1977). Audience mail: Letters to an anchorman. Journal of Communication, 27, 86-91
13. Goertz, L. (1995). Wie interaktiv sind Medien? Auf dem Weg zu einer Definition von Interaktivität. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 43, 477-493
14. Grey, D. L. and Brown, T. R. (1970). Letters to the editor: Hazy reflections and public opinion. Journalism Quarterly, 47, 450-456
15. Ha, L. and James, L. E. (1998). Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early web sites. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 42, 457-474
16. Haeckel, S.H. (1998). About the nature and future of interactive marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 12, 63-71
17. Heeter, C. (1989). Implications of new interactive technologies for conceptualizing communication. In J. L. Salvaggio and J. Bryant (Eds.), Media use in the information age: Emerging patterns of adoption and consumer use (pp. 217-235). Hillsdale: Earlbaum
18. Heeter, C. (2000). Interactivity in the context of designed experiences. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1. Retrieved July 27, 2006, from http://www.jiad.org/voll/nol/heeter/index.htm
19. Höflich, J.R. (1995). Vom dispersen Publikum zu "elektr Snischen Gemeinschaften". Plädoyer für einen erweiterten kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Blickwinkel. Rundfitnk und Fernsehen, 43, 518-537
20. Horton, D. and Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and parasocial interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215-229
21. Jäckel, M. (1995). Interaktion. Soziologische Anmerkungen zu cinem Begriff. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 43, 463-476
22. Jensen, J. F. (1998). 'Interactivity'. Tracking a new concept in media and communication studies. Nordicom Review, 19, 185-204
23. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., and Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quaterly, 37, 509-523
24. King, E. (1998): Redefining relationships. Interactivity between news producers and consumers. Convergence, 4, 26-32
25. Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media and Society, 4, 355-383
26. Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27-50
27. Lin, C. A. (2003). An interactive communication technology adoption model. Communication Theory, 13, 345-365
28. Liu, Y. and Shrum, L. J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31, 53-64
29. Lombard, M. and Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3. Retrieved May 21, 2006, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/lombard.html
30. Lombard, M. and Snyder-Dutch, J. (2001). Interactive advertising and presence: A framework. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1. Retrieved July 27, 2004, from http://www.jiad.org/voll/no2/lombard/index.htm
31. Lowe, D. and Hall, W. (1999). Hypermedia and the web. An engineering approach. Chichester, New York, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto: Wiley
32. Maletzke, G. (1963). Psychologie der Massenkommunikation. Hamburg: Hans-Bredow-Institut
33. Massey, B. L. and Levy, M. R. (1999). Interactivity, online journalism, and English-language newspapers in Asia. Journalism and Masscommunication Quarterly, 76, 138-151
34. McGuire, B. and Leroy, D. J. (1977). Audience mail: Letters to the broadcaster. Journal of Communication, 27, 79-85
35. McMillan, S. J. (2000). Interactivity is in the eye of the beholder: Function, perception, involvement, and attitude toward the web site. In M. A. Shaver (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2000 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 71-78). East Lansing: Michigan State Universtiy
36. McMillan, S. J. (2002a). Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: User, documents and systems. In L. A. Lievrouw, and S. Livingstone (Eds.): Handbook of new media. Social shaping and consequences oflCTs (pp. 163 - 182). London: Sage
37. McMillan, S. J. (2002b). A four-part model of cyber-interactivity. New Media and Society, 4, 271-291
38. McMillan, S. J. and Downes, E. J. (1998). Interactivity: A qualitative exploration of definitions and models. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Educators in Journalism and Afass Communication, Baltimore, MD, August 1998
39. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
40. Newhagen, J. E., Cordes, J. W., and Levy, M. R. (1996). Nightly@NBC.Com: Audience scope and the perception of interactivity in viewer mail on the internet. Journal of Communication, 45, 164-175
41. Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing
42. Orians, W. (1991). Hörerbeteiligung im Radio. Eine Fallstudie zu Motivation, Erwartung und Zufriedenheit von Anrufern. München: Reinhard Fischer
43. Pavlik, J. V. (1998). New media technology: Cultural and commercial perspectives. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
44. Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity. From new media to communication. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann and S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 110-134). Newbury Park: Sage
45. Rafaeli, S. and Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2. Retrieved August 03, 2006, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sud-weeks.html
46. Rogers, E. M. (1986). Communication technology. The new media in society. New York: Free Press
47. Rubin, A. M. and Step, M. M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk-radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 44: 635-654
48. Rubin, A. M. (2002). The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In J. Bryant and D. Zillmann (Ed.), Media effects. Advances in theory and research. Second Edition (pp. 525-548). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
49. Schlütz, D. (2002). Bildschirmspiele und ihre Faszination. München: Fischer
50. Schönbach, K. (1997). Das hyperaktive Publikum - Essay uber eine Illusion. Publizistik, 42, 279-286
51. Schönhagen, P. (2004). Soziale Kommunikation im Internet. Zur Theorie und Systematik computervermittelter Kommunikation vor dem Hintergrund der Konmutnikationsgeschichte. Bern: Peter Lang
52. Schweiger, W. and Quiring, O. (2005). User-generated content on mass media web sites - just a variety of interactivity or something completely different? Paper presented to the annual conference of the International Communication Association, New York
53. Short, J., Williams, E., and Christie, B. (1976). The psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley
54. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determiningtelepresence. Journal of Communication, 42, 73-93
55. Straubhaar, J. and LaRose, R. (1996). Communications media in the information society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Press
56. Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 433-460
57. Vorderer, P. (1992). Fernsehen als Handlung: Fernsehfilmrezeption aus motivations-psychologischer Sicht. Berlin: Edition Sigma
58. Vorderer, P. (2000). Interactive media and beyond. In D. Zillmann and P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment. The psychology of its appeal (pp. 21-36). Mahwah, NJ, London: Earlbaum
59. Weber, M. (1984). Soziologischc Grundbegriffe. Mohr Siebeck: UTB
60. Williams, R, Rice, R. E., and Rogers, E. M. (1988). Research methods and the new media. New York: Free Press
61. Woldt, R. (2004). Interaktives Fernsehen - groBe Potenzial, unklare Perspektiven. Media Perspektiven, 7, 301-309
62. Wu, G. (1999). Perceived interactivity and attitude toward websites. In M. S. Roberts (Ed.), Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 254-262). Gainesville: University of Florida