Current research on music perception in cochlear implant users

Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 129-140

  Limb, Charles J ^a   Rubinstein, Jay T ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Melody; Pitch; Rhythm; Timbre

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY CANAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; MUSIC; PERCEPTION; REVIEW;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; HUMANS; MUSIC; PITCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 82055203106     PISSN: 00306665     EISSN: 15578259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2011.08.021     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. McDermott H.J. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif 2004, 8(2):49-82.
2. Gfeller K., Woodworth G., Robin D.A., et al. Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1997, 18(3):252-260.
3. Migirov L., Kronenberg J., Henkin Y. Self-reported listening habits and enjoyment of music among adult cochlear implant recipients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2009, 118(5):350-355.
4. Galvin J.J., Fu Q.J., Oba S.I. Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 2009, 125(3):EL98-EL103.
5. Galvin J.J., Fu Q.J., Shannon R.V. Melodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant users. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009, 1169:518-533.
6. Gfeller K., Jiang D., Oleson J.J., et al. Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2010, 21(1):28-34.
7. Chen J.K., Chuang A.Y., McMahon C., et al. Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants. Pediatrics 2010, 125(4):e793-e800.
8. Trehub S.E., Vongpaisal T., Nakata T. Music in the lives of deaf children with cochlear implants. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009, 1169:534-542.
9. Driscoll V.D., Oleson J., Jiang D., et al. Effects of training on recognition of musical instruments presented through cochlear implant simulations. J Am Acad Audiol 2009, 20(1):71-82.
10. Looi V., She J. Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program. Int J Audiol 2010, 49(2):116-128.
11. Looi V., McDermott H., McKay C., et al. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users. Ear Hear 2008, 29(3):421-434.
12. Kasturi K., Loizou P.C. Effect of filter spacing on melody recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2007, 122(2):EL29-EL34.
13. Chang Y.T., Yang H.M., Lin Y.H., et al. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing. Otol Neurotol 2009, 30(6):750-757.
14. Veekmans K., Ressel L., Mueller J., et al. Comparison of music perception in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects. Audiol Neurootol 2009, 14(5):315-326.
15. Eddington D.K., Dobelle W.H., Brackmann D.E., et al. Place and periodicity pitch by stimulation of multiple scala tympani electrodes in deaf volunteers. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1978, 24:1-5.
16. Fujiki N., Naito Y., Hirano S., et al. Influence of speech-coding strategy on cortical activity in cochlear implant users: a positron emission tomographic study. Acta Otolaryngol 1998, 118(6):797-802.
17. Simmons F.B. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. Arch Otolaryngol 1966, 84(1):2-54.
18. Singh S., Kong Y., Zeng F.G. Cochlear implant melody recognition as a function of melody frequency range, harmonicity, and number of electrodes. Ear Hear 2009, 30(20):160-168.
19. Gfeller K., Lansing C.R. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. J Speech Hear Res 1991, 34(4):916-920.
20. McDermott H.J., McKay C.M. Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1997, 101(3):1622-1631.
21. Pijl S., Schwarz D.W. Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. J Acoust Soc Am 1995, 98(2 Pt 1):886-895.
22. Gfeller K., Turner C., Oleson J., et al. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise. Ear Hear 2007, 28(3):412-423.
23. Won J.H., Drennan W.R., Kang R.S., et al. Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2010, 31(6):796-805.
24. Won J.H., Drennan W.R., Rubinstein J.T. Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007, 8(3):384-392.
25. Drennan W.R., Longnion J.K., Ruffin C, et al. Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2008, 9(1):138-149.
26. Drennan W.R., Rubinstein J.T. Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008, 45(5):779-789.
27. Kang R., Nimmons G.L., Drennan W., et al. Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test. Ear Hear 2009, 30(4):411-418.
28. Nimmons G.L., Kang R.S., Drennan W.R., et al. Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners. Otol Neurotol 2008, 29(2):149-155.
29. Jung K.H., Cho Y.S., Cho J.K., et al. Clinical assessment of music perception in Korean cochlear implant listeners. Acta Otolaryngol 2010, 130(6):716-723.
30. Galvin J.J., Fu Q.J., Nogaki G. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear 2007, 28(3):302-319.
31. Swanson B., Dawson P., McDermott H. Investigating cochlear implant place-pitch perception with the Modified Melodies test. Cochlear Implants Int 2009, 10(Suppl 1):100-104.
32. Burns E.M., Viemeister N.F. Played-again SAM: further observations on the pitch of amplitude-modulated noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1981, 70:1655-1660.
33. Gfeller K., Knutson J.F., Woodworth G., et al. Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. J Am Acad Audiol 1998, 9(1):1-19.
34. Leal M.C., Shin Y.J., Laborde M.L., et al. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol 2003, 123(7):826-835.
35. Rahne T., Böhme L., Götze G. Timbre discrimination in cochlear implant users and normal hearing subjects using cross-faded synthetic tones. J Neurosci Methods 2011, 199(2):290-295.
36. Galvin J.J., Fu Q.J., Oba S. Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 2008, 124(4):EL189-EL195.
37. Brockmeier S.J., Peterreins M., Lorens A., et al. Music perception in electric acoustic stimulation users as assessed by the Mu.S.I.C. test. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2010, 67:70-80.
38. Spitzer J.B., Mancuso D., Chengt M.Y. Development of a clinical test of musical perception: appreciation of music in cochlear implantees (AMICI). J Am Acad Audiol 2008, 19(1):56-81.
39. Donnelly P.J., Guo B.Z., Limb C.J. Perceptual fusion of polyphonic pitch in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 2009, 126(5):EL128-EL133.
40. Kim I., Yang E., Donnelly P.J., et al. Preservation of rhythmic clocking in cochlear implant users: a study of isochronous versus anisochronous beat detection. Trends Amplif 2010, 14(3):164-169.
41. Cooper W.B., Tobey E., Loizou P.C. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal battery for Evaluation of Amusia. Ear Hear 2008, 29(4):618-626.
42. Gfeller K., Christ A., Knutson J.F., et al. Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2000, 11(7):390-406.
43. Kong Y.Y., Cruz R., Jones J.A., et al. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear 2004, 25(2):173-185.
44. Szelag E., Kolodziejczyk I., Kanabus M., et al. Deficits of non-verbal auditory perception in postlingually deaf humans using cochlear implants. Neurosci Lett 2004, 355(1-2):49-52.
45. Patel A.D., Iversen J.R., Chen Y., et al. The influence of metricality and modality on synchronization with a beat. Exp Brain Res 2005, 163(2):226-238.
46. Patel A.D. Rhythm in language and music: parallels and differences. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003, 999:140-143.
47. Sandemann P., Kegel A., Eichele T., et al. Neurophysiological evidence of impaired musical sound perception in cochlear implant users. Clin Neurophysiol 2010, 121(12):2070-2082.
48. Koelsch S., Wittfoth M., Wolf A., et al. Music perception in cochlear implant users: an event-related potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 2004, 115(4):966-972.
49. Limb C.J., Molloy A.T., Jiradejvong P., et al. Auditory cortical activity during cochlear implant-mediated perception of spoken language, melody and rhythm. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2010, 11(1):133-143.
50. Ito J., Sakakibara J., Iwasaki Y., et al. Positron emission tomography of auditory sensation in deaf patients and patients with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993, 102(10):797-801.
51. Lee H.J., Giraud A.L., Kang E., et al. Cortical activity at rest predicts cochlear implantation outcome. Cereb Cortex 2007, 17(4):909-917.
52. Giraud A.L., Truy E. The contribution of visual areas to speech comprehension: a PET study in cochlear implant patients and normal-hearing subjects. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40(9):1562-1569.
53. Giraud A.L., Truy E., Frackowiak R. Imaging plasticity in cochlear implant patients. Audiol Neurootol 2001, 6(6):381-393.
54. Giraud A.L., Price C.J., Graham J.M., et al. Cross-modal plasticity underpins language recovery after cochlear implantation. Neuron 2001, 30(3):657-663.
55. Miyamoto R.T., Wong D. Positron emission tomography in cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant recipients. J Commun Disord 2001, 34(6):473-478.
56. Wong D., Miyamoto R.T., Pisoni D.B., et al. PET imaging of cochlear-implant and normal-hearing subjects listening to speech and nonspeech. Hear Res 1999, 132(1-2):34-42.
57. Wong D., Pisoni D.B., Learn J., et al. PET imaging of differential cortical activation by monaural speech and nonspeech stimuli. Hear Res 2002, 166(1-2):9-23.
58. Fujiki N., Naito Y., Hirano S., et al. Influence of speech-coding strategy on cortical activity in cochlear implant users: a positron emission tomographic study. Acta Otolaryngol 1998, 118(6):797-802.
59. Green K.M., Julyan P.J., Hasings D.L., et al. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness. Hear Res 2005, 205(1-2):184-192.
60. Nishimura H., Doi K., Iwaki T., et al. Neural plasticity detected in short- and long-term cochlear implant users using PET. Neuroreport 2000, 11(4):811-815.
61. Drayna D., Manichaikul A., de Lange M., et al. Genetic correlates of musical pitch recognition in humans. Science 2001, 291(5510):1969-1972.
62. Drennan W.R., Won J.H., Dasika V.K., et al. Effects of temporal fine structure on the lateralization of speech and on speech understanding in noise. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007, 8(3):373-383.
63. Gifford R.H., Dorman M.F., Brown C.A. Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2010, 67:51-60.
64. Sucher C.M., McDermott H.J. Bimodal stimulation: benefits for music perception and sound quality. Cochlear Implants Int 2009, 10(Suppl 1):96-99.
65. Singh S., Kong Y.Y., Zeng F.G. Cochlear implant melody recognition as a function of melody frequency range, harmonicity, and number of electrodes. Ear Hear 2009, 30(2):160-168.
66. Cooper H.R., Roberts B. Auditory stream segregation in cochlear implant listeners: measures based on temporal discrimination and interleaved melody recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 2009, 126(4):1975-1987.
67. Oxenham A.J. Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants. Trends Amplif 2008, 12(4):316-331.