Self-reported listening habits and enjoyment of music among adult cochlear implant recipients

Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

Volumn 118, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 350-355

  Migirov, Lela ^a   Kronenberg, Jona ^a   Henkin, Yael ^a,b  

^a SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Enjoyment; Listening habits; Music; Self report

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; HABIT; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MALE; MUSIC; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECIPIENT; SELF REPORT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT DURATION;

EID: 66249145071     PISSN: 00034894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000348940911800506     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Friedland DR, Venick HS, Niparko JK. Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:582-589 (Pubitemid 36886271)
2. Brown KD, Balkany TJ. Benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation: a review. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;15:315-318 (Pubitemid 47373976)
3. McDermott HJ. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif 2004;8:49-82. (Pubitemid 39435144)
4. Gfeller K, Witt S, Adamek K, et al. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2002;13:132-145 (Pubitemid 34467516)
5. Gfeller K, Olszewski C, Rychener M, et al. Recognition of "real-world" musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Ear Hear 2005;26:237-250
6. Mirza S, Douglas SA, Lindsey P, Hildreth T, Hawthorne M. Appreciation of music in adult patients with cochlear implants: a patient questionnaire. Cochlear Implants Int 2003;4:85-95.
7. Brockmeier SJ, Nopp P, Vischer M, et al. Correlation of speech and music perception in postlingually deaf Combi 40/40+ users. In: Kubo T, Takahashi Y, Iwaki T, eds. Cochlear implants: an update. The Hague, the Netherlands: Karger Publications, 2002:459-464
8. Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, Witt S, Murray KT, Tyler RS. Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2000;11:390-406.
9. Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, et al. Changes in listening habits and quality of musical sound after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:363-367
10. Brockmeier SJ, Grasmeder M, Passow S, et al. Comparison of musical activities of cochlear implant users with different speech-coding strategies. Ear Hear 2007;28(suppl):49S-51S. (Pubitemid 46673659)
11. Boothroyg A. Statistical theory of speech discrimination score. J Acoust Soc Am 1968;43:362-367
12. Eisenberg LS. Use of the cochlear implant by the prelingually deaf. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1982;91(suppl 91):62-66
13. Leal MC, Shin YJ, Laborde ML, et al. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol 2003;123:826-835 (Pubitemid 37222698)
14. Tyler RS, Gfeller K, Mehr MA. A preliminary investigation comparing one and eight channels at fast and slow rates on music appraisal in adults with cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants Int 2000;1:82-87