Neurophysiological evidence of impaired musical sound perception in cochlear-implant users

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 121, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2070-2082

  Sandmann, Pascale ^a,b   Kegel, Andrea ^c   Eichele, Tom ^d   Dillier, Norbert ^c   Lai, Waikong ^c   Bendixen, Alexandra ^e   Debener, Stefan ^b   Jancke, Lutz ^a   Meyer, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Central auditory processing; Cochlear implant (CI); Mismatch negativity (MMN); Music perception; Sound discrimination

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; MUSIC; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DEAFNESS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; REACTION TIME; SOUND; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 78049292709     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.032     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Allen J.B., Hall J.L., Jeng P.S. Loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands (LGOB) - a procedure for the assessment of loudness. J Acoust Soc Am 1990, 88:745-753.
2. Anderson I., Baumgartner W.D., Boheim K., Nahler A., Arnoldner C., D'Haese P. Telephone use: what benefit do cochlear implant users receive?. Int J Audiol 2006, 45:446-453.
3. Annett M. A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Br J Psychol 1970, 61:303-321.
4. Baldeweg T. Repetition effects to sounds: evidence for predictive coding in the auditory system. Trends Cogn Sci 2006, 10:93-94.
5. Beaucousin V., Lacheret A., Turbelin M.R., Morel M., Mazoyer B., Tzourio-Mazoyer N. FMRI study of emotional speech comprehension. Cereb Cortex 2007, 17:339-352.
6. Blamey P.J., Pyman B.C., Gordon M., Clark G.M., Brown A.M., Dowell R.C., et al. Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992, 101:342-348.
7. Brancucci A., San Martini P. Laterality in the perception of temporal cues of musical timbre. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:1445-1451.
8. Cooper W.B., Tobey E., Loizou P.C. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia. Ear Hear 2008, 29:618-626.
9. Debener S., Hine J., Bleeck S., Eyles J. Source localization of auditory evoked potentials after cochlear implantation. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:20-24.
10. Dehaene-Lambertz G., Pallier C., Serniclaes W., Sprenger-Charolles L., Jobert A., Dehaene S. Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception. Neuroimage 2005, 24:21-33.
11. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
12. Drennan W.R., Rubinstein J.T. Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008, 45:779-790.
13. Fisher D.J., Labelle A., Knott V.J. The right profile: mismatch negativity in schizophrenia with and without auditory hallucinations as measured by a multi-feature paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol 2008, 119:909-921.
14. Friesen L.M., Shannon R.V., Baskent D., Wang X. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2001, 110:1150-1163.
15. Friesen L.M., Tremblay K.L., Rohila N., Wright R.A., Shannon R.V., Baskent D., et al. Evoked cortical activity and speech recognition as a function of the number of simulated cochlear implant channels. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120:776-782.
16. Galvin J.J.I., Fu Q.J., Nogaki G. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear 2007, 28:302-319.
17. Gfeller K., Christ A., Knutson J.F., Witt S., Murray K.T., Tyler R.S. Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2000, 11:390-406.
18. Gfeller K., Olszewski C., Rychener M., Sena K., Knutson J.F., Witt S., et al. Recognition of " real-world" musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Ear Hear 2005, 26:237-250.
19. Gfeller K., Turner C., Mehr M., Woodworth G., Fearn R., Knutson J.F., et al. Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants Int 2002, 3:29-53.
20. Gfeller K., Witt S., Adamek M., Mehr M., Rogers J., Stordahl J., et al. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2002, 13:132-145.
21. Gilley P.M., Sharma A., Dorman M., Finley C.C., Panch A.S., Martin K. Minimization of cochlear implant stimulus artifact in cortical auditory evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 117:1772-1782.
22. Gilley P.M., Sharma A., Dorman M.F. Cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants. Brain Res 2008, 1239:56-65.
23. Giraud A.L., Truy E., Frackowiak R. Imaging plasticity in cochlear implant patients. Audiol Neurootol 2001, 6:381-393.
24. Gomaa N.A., Rubinstein J.T., Lowder M.W., Tyler R.S., Gantz B.J. Residual speech perception and cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults. Ear Hear 2003, 24:539-544.
25. Greenwood D.D. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species - 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990, 87:2592-2605.
26. Groenen P., Snik A., van den Broek P. On the clinical relevance of mismatch negativity: results from subjects with normal hearing and cochlear implant users. Audiol Neurootol 1996, 1:112-124.
27. Horvath J., Czigler I., Jacobsen T., Maess B., Schroger E., Winkler I. MMN or no MMN: no magnitude of deviance effect on the MMN amplitude. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:60-69.
28. Jacobsen T., Schroger E. Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch?. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:723-727.
29. Jacobsen T., Schroger E. Measuring duration mismatch negativity. Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 114:1133-1143.
30. Jancke L. Music, memory and emotion. J Biol 2008, 7:21.
31. Jankowiak S., Berti S. Behavioural and event-related potential distraction effects with regularly occurring auditory deviants. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:79-85.
32. Joanisse M.F., Gati J.S. Overlapping neural regions for processing rapid temporal cues in speech and nonspeech signals. Neuroimage 2003, 19:64-79.
33. Jung T.P., Makeig S., Humphries C., Lee T.W., McKeown M.J., Iragui V., et al. Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:163-178.
34. Jung T.P., Makeig S., Westerfield M., Townsend J., Courchesne E., Sejnowski T.J. Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2000, 111:1745-1758.
35. Kelly A.S., Purdy S.C., Thorne P.R. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users. Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 116:1235-1246.
36. Kiesel A., Miller J., Jolicoeur P., Brisson B. Measurement of ERP latency differences: a comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:250-274.
37. Koelsch S., Wittfoth M., Wolf A., Muller J., Hahne A. Music perception in cochlear implant users: an event-related potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 2004, 115:966-972.
38. Kong Y.Y., Cruz R., Jones J.A., Zeng F.G. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear 2004, 25:173-185.
39. Kraus N., Micco A.G., Koch D.B., McGee T., Carrell T., Sharma A., et al. The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear-implant users. Hear Res 1993, 65:118-124.
40. Krueger B., Joseph G., Rost U., Strauss-Schier A., Lenarz T., Buechner A. Performance groups in adult cochlear implant users: speech perception results from 1984 until today. Otol Neurotol 2008, 29:509-512.
41. Kujala T., Karma K., Ceponiene R., Belitz S., Turkkila P., Tervaniemi M., et al. Plastic neural changes and reading improvement caused by audiovisual training in reading-impaired children. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:10509-10514.
42. Laneau J., Moonen M., Wouters J. Factors affecting the use of noise-band vocoders as acoustic models for pitch perception in cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2006, 119:491-506.
43. Liebenthal E., Binder J.R., Piorkowski R.L., Remez R.E. Short-term reorganization of auditory analysis induced by phonetic experience. J Cogn Neurosci 2003, 15:549-558.
44. Lonka E., Kujala T., Lehtokoski A., Johansson R., Rimmanen S., Alho K., et al. Mismatch negativity brain response as an index of speech perception recovery in cochlear-implant recipients. Audiol Neurootol 2004, 9:160-162.
45. McDermott H.J. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif 2004, 8:49-82.
46. Menon V., Levitin D.J., Smith B.K., Lembke A., Krasnow B.D., Glazer D., et al. Neural correlates of timbre change in harmonic sounds. Neuroimage 2002, 17:1742-1754.
47. Meyer M., Zaehle T., Gountouna V.E., Barron A., Jancke L., Turk A. Spectro-temporal processing during speech perception involves left posterior auditory cortex. Neuroreport 2005, 16:1985-1989.
48. Miller J., Ulrich R., Schwarz W. Why jackknifing yields good latency estimates. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:300-312.
49. Moore D.R., Shannon R.V. Beyond cochlear implants: awakening the deafened brain. Nat Neurosci 2009, 12:686-691.
50. Muller-Gass A., Stelmack R.M., Campbell K.B. " ...and were instructed to read a self-selected book while ignoring the auditory stimuli": the effects of task demands on the mismatch negativity. Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 116:2142-2152.
51. Naatanen R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav Brain Sci 1990, 13:201-208.
52. Naatanen R., Gaillard A.W., Mantysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1978, 42:313-329.
53. Naatanen R., Paavilainen P., Rinne T., Alho K. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clin Neurophysiol 2007, 118:2544-2590.
54. Naatanen R., Pakarinen S., Rinne T., Takegata R. The mismatch negativity (MMN): towards the optimal paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol 2004, 115:140-144.
55. Naatanen R., Tervaniemi M., Sussman E., Paavilainen P., Winkler I. " Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex. Trends Neurosci 2001, 24:283-288.
56. Oh S.H., Kim C.S., Kang E.J., Lee H.J., Lee D.S., Chang S.O., et al. Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4-year time period. Acta Otolaryngol 2003, 123:148-153.
57. Pakarinen S., Takegata R., Rinne T., Huotilainen M., Naatanen R. Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP). Clin Neurophysiol 2007, 118:177-185.
58. Pantev C., Dinnesen A., Ross B., Wollbrink A., Knief A. Dynamics of auditory plasticity after cochlear implantation: a longitudinal study. Cereb Cortex 2006, 16:31-36.
59. Patrick J.F., Busby P.A., Gibson P.J. The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system. Trends Amplif 2006, 10:175-200.
60. Ponton C.W., Don M. The mismatch negativity in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1995, 16:131-146.
61. Ponton C.W., Don M., Eggermont J.J., Waring M.D., Masuda A. Maturation of human cortical auditory function: differences between normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 1996, 17:430-437.
62. Ponton C.W., Eggermont J.J., Don M., Waring M.D., Kwong B., Cunningham J., et al. Maturation of the mismatch negativity: effects of profound deafness and cochlear implant use. Audiol Neurootol 2000, 5:167-185.
63. Quian Quiroga R., Garcia H. Single-trial event-related potentials with wavelet denoising. Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 114:376-390.
64. Roman S., Canevet G., Marquis P., Triglia J.M., Liegeois-Chauvel C. Relationship between auditory perception skills and mismatch negativity recorded in free field in cochlear-implant users. Hear Res 2005, 201:10-20.
65. Roman S., Debailleux S., Canevet G., Triglia J.M., Liegeois-Chauvel C. Mismatch negativity and tone discrimination in cochlear-implanted patients. Cochlear Implants Int 2005, 6(Suppl. 1):53-55.
66. Samson S., Zatorre R.J. Contribution of the right temporal lobe to musical timbre discrimination. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32:231-240.
67. Sandmann P., Eichele T., Buechler M., Debener S., Jancke L., Dillier N., et al. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation. Brain 2009, 132:1967-1979.
68. Sarkamo T., Tervaniemi M., Laitinen S., Forsblom A., Soinila S., Mikkonen M., et al. Music listening enhances cognitive recovery and mood after middle cerebral artery stroke. Brain 2008, 131:866-876.
69. Scherer K.R., Oshinsky J.S. Cue utilization in emotion attribution from auditory stimuli. Motiv Emot 1977, 1:331-346.
70. Schroger E., Wolff C. Mismatch response of the human brain to changes in sound location. Neuroreport 1996, 7:3005-3008.
71. Shannon R.V., Zeng F.G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 1995, 270:303-304.
72. Sharma A., Dorman M.F. Central auditory development in children with cochlear implants: clinical implications. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2006, 64:66-88.
73. Sharma A., Dorman M.F., Spahr A.J. Rapid development of cortical auditory evoked potentials after early cochlear implantation. Neuroreport 2002, 13:1365-1368.
74. Suarez H., Mut F., Lago G., Silveira A., De Bellis C., Velluti R., et al. Changes in the cerebral blood flow in postlingual cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol 1999, 119:239-243.
75. Sussman E.S. A new view on the MMN and attention debate: the role of context in processing auditory events. J Psychophysiol 2007, 21:164-175.
76. Titterington J., Watson D., Toner J., Henry A. What can the mismatch negativity (MMN) tell us about short-term auditory sensory memory function in cochlear implanted children?. Cochlear Implants Int 2003, 4(Suppl. 1):70-72.
77. Veekmans K., Ressel L., Mueller J., Vischer M., Brockmeier S.J. Comparison of music perception in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects. Audiol Neurootol 2009, 14:315-326.
78. Wable J., van den Abbeele T., Gallégo S., Frachet B. Mismatch negativity: a tool for the assessment of stimuli discrimination in cochlear implant subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2000, 111:743-751.
79. Winkler I. Interpreting the mismatch negativity. J Psychophysiol 2007, 21:147-163.
80. Zeng F.G. Loudness growth in forward masking: relation to intensity discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 1994, 96:2127-2132.
81. Zeng F.G. Trends in cochlear implants. Trends Amplif 2004, 8:1-34.