Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: Implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation

Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Volumn 67, Issue , 2010, Pages 51-60

  Gifford, René H ^a   Dorman, Michael F ^b   Brown, Christopher A ^b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MUSIC; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REVIEW; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MUSIC; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 77950362280     PISSN: 00653071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1159/000262596     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Gantz BJ, Turner CW: Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1726-1730.
2. Gantz BJ, Turner CW, Gfeller KE, Lowder M: Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005;115:796-802.
3. Gantz BJ, Turner CW, Gfeller KE: Acoustic plus electric speech processing: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implant. Audiol Neurootol 2006;11(Suppl 1):63-68.
4. Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A: Preservation of low-frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation. Int Congr Ser 2004;1273:239-242.
5. Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Anderson I: Partial deafness cochlear implantation provides benefit to a new population of individuals with hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol 2006;126:934-940.
6. Gstoettner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner WD, Pok S, Peters S, Adunka O: Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic Stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:348-352.
7. Gstoettner W, Pok SM, Peters S, Kiefer J, Adunka O: Cochlear implantation with preservation of residual deep frequency hearing. HNO 2005;53:784-791.
8. Gstoettner WK, Van de Heyning P, O'Connor AF, Morera C, Sainz M, Vermeire K, McDonald S, Cavalle L, Helbig S, Valdecasa JG, Anderson I, Adunka OF: Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation. Acta Otolaryngol 2008;128:968-975.
9. Kiefer J, Pok M, Adunka O, Stuerzebecher E, Baumgartner WD, Schmidt M: Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study. Audiol Neurotol 2005;10:134-144.
10. Luetje CM, Thedinger BS, Buckler LR, Dawson KL, Lisbona KL: Hybrid cochlear implantation: clinical results and critical review of 13 cases. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:473-478.
11. Von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, Tillein J, Pfennigdorff T, Hartmann R, Stuerzebecher E, Klinke R: Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. ORL 1999;61:334-340.
12. Gantz BJ, Turner CW: Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:334-347.
13. Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Muller JM, Tyler RS, Kiefer J: Cochlear implants: some likely next steps. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2003;5:207-249.
14. Brill S, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Wilson BS, Schatzer R: Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Eleventh Quarterly Progress Report on NIH Project N01-DC-8-2105, 2002.
15. Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Spahr AJ, Bacon SP, Skarzynski H, Lorens A: Hearing preservation surgery: psychophysical estimates of cochlear damage in recipients of a short electrode array. J Acoust Soc Am 2008;124:2164-2173.
16. Ching TY, Inceri P, Hill M: Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear 2004;25:9-21.
17. Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Spahr AJ, McKarns SA: Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing. J Speech Hear Res 2007;50:835-843.
18. Wilson B, Wolford R, Lawson D, Schatzer R: Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Third Quarter Progress Report on NIH Project N01-DC-2-1002, 2002.
19. Oxenham AO, Dau T: Reconciling frequency selectivity and phase effects in masking. J Acoust Soc Am 2001:110:1525-1538.
20. Plack CJ, Oxenham AJ, Simonson AM, O'Hanlon CG, Drga V, Arifianto D: Estimates of compression at low and high frequencies using masking additivity in normal and impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 2008;123:4321-4330.
21. Gorga MP, Neely ST, Dierking DM, Kopun J, Jolkowski K, Groenenboom K, Tan H, Stiegemann B: Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 2007;122:1671.
22. Schroeder MR: Synthesis of low peakfactor signal and binary sequences with low autocorrelation. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 1971;16:85-89.
23. Oxenham AO, Dau T: Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearingimpaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;116:2248-2257.
24. Patterson RD: Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1976;59:640-654.
25. Stone MA, Glasberg BR, Moore BCJ: Simplified measurement of auditory filter shapes using the notched-noise method. Br J Audiol 1992;26:329-334.
26. Levitt H: Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971;49:467-477.
27. Patterson RD, Nimmo-Smith I, Weber DL, Milroy R: The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 1982;72:1788-1803
28. Glasberg BR, Moore BCJ: Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notchednoise data. Hear Res 1990;47:103-138.
29. Laroche C, Hetu R, Quoc HT, Josserand B, Glasberg B: Frequency selectivity in workers with noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res 1992;64:61-72.
30. Leek MR, Summers V: Auditory filter shapes of normal-hearing and hearingimpaired listeners in continuous broadband noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;94:3127-3137.
31. Spahr AJ, Dorman MF, Loiselle L: Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: effects of input dynamic range. Ear Hear 2007;28:260-275.
32. Gfeller KE , Turner CW, Oleson J, Zhang X, Gantz B, Froman R, Olszewski C: Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise. Ear Hear 2007;28:412-423.
33. Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT: Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45:779-789.
34. Dorman MF, Gifford RH, Spahr AJ, McKarns SA: The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies. Audiol Neurotol 2008;13:105-112.
35. Kong YY, Stickney GS, Zeng FG: Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;117:1351-1361.
36. Fu Q-J, Shannon RV, Wang X: Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104:3586-3596.
37. Nelson PB, Jin S-H, Carney AE, Nelson DA: Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;113:961-968.
38. Fu Q-J, Nogaki G: Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing. J Assoc Res Otolarygol 2005;6:19-27.
39. Gfeller KE, Olszewski C, Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Oleson J: Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiol Neurotol 2006;11(Suppl 1):12-15.
40. Dorman MF, Gifford RH, Lewis K, McKarns S, Ratigan J, Spahr A, Shallop JK, Driscoll CLW, Luetje C, Thedinger BS, Beatty CW, Syms M, Novak M, Barrs D, Cowdrey L, Black J, Loiselle L: Word recognition following implantation of conventional and 10 mm hybrid electrodes. Audiol Neurotol 2009;14:181-189.
41. Gifford RH, Shallop JK, Driscoll CLW, Beatty CW. Lane JI, Peterson AM: Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation with a Long Electrode Array. Conf Implant Aud Prostheses, Tahoe City, 2007.
42. Nilsson M, Soli S, Sullivan J: Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;95:1085-1099.
43. Compton-Conley CL, Neuman AC, Killion MC, Levitt H: Performance of directional microphones for hearing aids: real-world versus simulation. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;15:440-455.
44. Plomp R, Mimpen MA: Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979;18:43-52.