Deficits of non-verbal auditory perception in postlingually deaf humans using cochlear implants

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 355, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 49-52

  Szelag, E ^a   Kolodziejczyk, I ^a   Kanabus, M ^a   Szuchnik, J ^b   Senderski, A ^b  

^a NENCKI INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY   (Poland)

^b INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY OF HEARING   (Poland)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Subjective rhythm; Temporal integration; Timing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANT; LANGUAGE TEST; MALE; ONSET AGE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PERIODICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUE; RHYTHM; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL LOBE; TIME; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 0346023023     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.10.025     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bavelier D., Neville H.J. Cross-modal plasticity: where and how? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3:2002;443-452.
2. Cazals Y., Pelizzone M., Saudan O., Boex C. Low-pass filtering in amplitude modulation detection associated with vowel and consonant identification in subjects with cochlear implant. J. Accoust. Soc. Am. 96:1994;2048-2054.
3. Fu Q.J. Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. NeuroReport. 13:2002;1635-1639.
4. Giraud A., Price C.J., Graham J.M., Frackowiak R.S.J. Functional plasticity of language-related brain areas after cochlear implantation. Brain. 124:2001;1307-1316.
5. Giraud A.L., Truy E., Frackowiak R.S., Gregoire M.C., Pujol J.F., Collet L. Differential recruitment of the speech processing system in healthy subjects and rehabilitated cochlear implant patients. Brain. 123:2000;1391-1402.
6. Hochmair-Desoyer I.J. Results from better postlingual adult users of the MED-EL devices. Hochmair-Desoyer I.J., Hochmair E.S. Advances in Cochlear Implants. 1994;363-368 Manz, Wien.
7. Hochmair-Desoyer I.J., Hochmair E. Implementation of coding strategies in cochlear implant systems and comparative results. Central East Eur. J. Otorhinolar. Head Neck. 1:1996;33-41.
8. Hochmair E.S., Hochmair-Desoyer I.J. Percepts elicited by different speech-coding strategies. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 405:1983;268-279.
9. Pöppel E. A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1:1997;56-61.
10. Pöppel E. Temporal mechanisms in perception. Int. J. Neurobiol. 37:1994;185-202.
11. Shannon R.V. Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85:1989;2587-2592.
12. Szelag E. Temporal integration of the brain as studied with the metronome paradigm. Atmanspacher H., Ruhnau E. Time, Temporality, Now. 1997;121-131 Springer, Berlin.
13. Szelag E., Kowalska J., Rymarczyk K., Pöppel E. Temporal integration in a subjective accentuation task as a function of child cognitive development. Neurosci. Lett. 257:1998;69-72.
14. Szelag E., von Steinbüchel N., Pöppel E. Temporal processing in patients with Broca's aphasia. Neurosci. Lett. 235:1997;33-36.
15. Tallal P., Steve S., Miller L., Bedi G., Byma G., Wang X., Nagarajan S., Schreiner C., Jenkins W., Merzenich M. Language comprehension in Language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science. 271:1996;81-84.
16. v. Steinbüchel N., Wittmann M., Strasburger H., Szelag E. Auditory temporal-order judgments is impaired in patients with cortical lesions in posterior regions of the left hemisphere. Neurosci. Lett. 264:1999;168-171.
17. Vollrath M., Kazenwadel J., Krüger H. A universal constant in temporal segmentation of human speech. Naturwissenschaften. 79:1992;479-490.
18. Wilson B.S. Signal processing. Tyler R.S. Cochlear Implants Audiological Foundations. 1993;35-85 Singular Publishing Group, San Diego.
19. Wong D., Miyamoto R.T., Pisoni D.B., Sehgal M., Hutchins G.D. PET imaging of cochlear-implant and normal-hearing subjects listening to speech and non-speech. Hear. Res. 132:1999;34-42.