Music perception in electric acoustic stimulation users as assessed by the Mu.S.I.C. test

Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Volumn 67, Issue , 2010, Pages 70-80

  Brockmeier, S J ^a,i   Peterreins, M ^a   Lorens, A ^d   Vermeire, K ^e,g   Helbig, S ^b   Anderson, I ^f   Skarzynski, H ^d   Van De Heyning, P ^e   Gstoettner, W ^b,h   Kiefer, J ^a,c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c HNO Zentrum Regensburg   (Germany)

^d INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY OF HEARING   (Poland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^f MED EL GmbH   (Austria)

^g UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^h UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FOLLOW UP; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROGNOSIS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; PROGNOSIS;

EID: 77950363412     PISSN: 00653071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1159/000262598     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Kiefer J, Pok M, Adunka O, Stürzebecher E, Baumgartner W, Schmidt M, Tillein J, Ye Q, Gstoettner W: Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study. Audiol Neurotol 2005;10:134-143.
2. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW: Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005;115:796-802.
3. Gstoettner WK, Van De Heyning P, ÓConnor AF, Morera C, Sainz M, Vermeire K, McDonald S, Cavalle L, Helbig S, Valdecasas JG, Anderson I, Adunka OF: Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation. Acta Otolaryngol 2008;12:1-8.
4. Kiefer J, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner W, Pok SM, Tillein J, Ye Q, von Ilberg C: Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:272-280.
5. McDermott HJ: Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif 2004;8:49-82.
6. Brockmeier SJ, Nopp P, Vischer M, Baumgartner W, Stark T, Schoen F, Mueller J, Braunschweig T, Busch R, Getto M, Arnold W, Allum DJ: Correlation of speech and music perception in Combi 40/40+ users; in Kubo T, Takahashi Y, Iwaki T (eds): Cochlear Implants: An Update. The Hague, Kugler Publications, 2002, pp 459-464.
7. Veekmans K, Ressel L, Mueller J, Vischer M, Brockmeier SJ: Comparison of Music Perception in Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users and Normal- Hearing Subjects. Audiol Neurootol 2009;14:315-326.
8. Brill S, Brockmeier SJ, Ressel L, Mueller J, Helms J: Music perception in bilateral CI with clinical CIS processors. Proc 5th Asia Pacific Symp Cochlear Implants Relat Sci (APSCI), Hong Kong, 2005.
9. Gfeller KE, Olszewski C, Turner C, Gantz B, Oleoson J: Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiol Neurotol 2006;11(suppl 1):12-15.
10. Fitzgerald D, Fitzgerald H, Brockmeier SJ, Searle O, Grebenev L, Nopp P: Musical Sounds in Cochlear Implants (MuSIC) Test. Innsbruck, MED-EL, 2006.
11. Brockmeier SJ: Munich Music Questionnaire (MUMU). MED-EL, GmbH, 2000. http://www.medel.com/english/50- Rehabilitation/Free-download/munichmusic- questionaire.php (accessed December 11, 2008).
12. Jatho AK, Heck KH: Schwellenaudiometrische Untersuchungen über die Progredienz und Charakteristik der Altersschwerhörigkeit in den verschiedenen Lebensabschnitten (Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Pathogenese der Presbyacusis Z) Laryngol Rhinol 1958;38:72-88.
13. Tervaniemi M, Just V, Koelsch S, Widmann A, Schroeger E: Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study. Exp Brain Res 2005;161:1-10.
14. Peretz I, Zatorre RJ: Brain organization for music processing. Annu Rev Psychol 2005;56:89-114.
15. Arnoldner C, Kaider A, Hamzavi J: The role of intensity upon pitch perception in cochlear implant recipients. Laryngoscope 2006:116:1760-1765.
16. Zng FG: Trends in cochlear implantation. Trends Amplif 2004;8:T1-T34.
17. Schulz E, Kerber M: Music perception with the MED-EL implants; in Hochmair- Desoyer IJ, Hochmaier ES (eds): Advances in Cochlear Implants. Vienna, Manz, 1994, pp 326-332.
18. Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, Witt S, Murray KT, Tyler RS: Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2000;7:390-406.
19. Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG: Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear 2004;25:173-185.
20. Fujita S, Ito J: Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108: 634-640.
21. Leal MC, Shin YJ, Laborde ML, Calmels MN, Verges S, Lugardon S, Andrieu S, Geguine O, Fraysse B: Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol 2003;123:826-835.
22. Looi V, McDermott HJ, McKay CM, Hickson L: Pitch discrimination and melody recognition by cochlear implant users. Int Congr Ser 2004;1273: 197-200.
23. Brockmeier SJ, Vermiere K, Grasmeder M, Helbig S, Lorens A, Searle O, Peterreins M, Kiefer J, Arnold W: Music perception of different CI users (unilateral, EAS, bimodal) and comparison to normal hearing subjects as assessed in the MuSIC test. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Cochlear Implants and Related Sciences, Vienna, Austria. Wien Med Wochenschr 2006;156(suppl 119):Z7-O4.
24. Dorman MF, Grifford RH, Spahr AJ, Mc Karns SA: The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies Audiol Neurotol 2008;12:105-112.
25. Kong YY, Stickney GS, Zeng FG: Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;117:1351-1361.
26. Grasmeder M, Lutman M: The identification of musical instruments through Nucleus cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants Int 2006;7:148-158.
27. Gfeller K, Witt S, Woodworth G, Mehr M, Knutson J: Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002;111:349-356.
28. McDermot HJ, Looi V: Perception of complex signals, including musical sounds with cochlear implants. Int Congr Ser 2004;1273:201-204.
29. Brockmeier SJ, Fitzgerald D, Fitzgerald O, Searle O, Vermiere K, Lorens A, Brill S, Peterreins M, Arnold W: Musikwahrnehmung mit Cochlear Implantaten; in Gross M (ed): Aktuelle phoniatrisch- pädaudiologische Aspekte. Norderstedt, Kruse Books on Demand GmbH, 2007.
30. Franks JR: Judgments of hearing aid processed music. Ear Hear 1982;3:18-23.
31. Dowling WJ, Harwood DL: Music Cognition. London, Academic Press Inc Ltd, 1986.
32. Krumhansl C: Music psychology: tonal structures in perception and memory. Annu Rev Psychol 1991;42:277-303.
33. Plomb R: Pitch of complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1967;41:1526-1533.
34. Krumhansl CL: An exploratory study on musical emotions and psychophysiology. Can J Exp Psychol 1997;41:336-352.
35. Gregory AH, Varney N: Cross-cultural comparisons in the affective response to music. Psychol Music 1996;24:47-52.
36. Cazden N: Musical consonance and dissonance: A cultural criterion. J Aesthet Art Crit 1945:11:3-11.
37. Brockmeier SJ: Emotional response to music in Combi40/40+ users. Cochlear Implants Int 2003;4:25-27.