Colonoscopy: Basic principles and novel techniques

Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 8, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 554-564

  Hazewinkel, Yark ^a   Dekker, Evelien ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PRESSURE; APPLICATION SITE DISCOMFORT; AUTOFLUORESCENCE IMAGING; CHILD HEALTH CARE; CHROMOENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL INDICATOR; COLON ADENOMA; COLON MUCOSA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; ELECTROGASTROGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAGNETIC FIELD; POLYPECTOMY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RIGIDITY; SEDATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADENOMA; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80053654944     PISSN: 17595045     EISSN: 17595053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.141     Document Type: Review

References (109)

1. Ko, C. W. et al. Serious complications within 30 days of screening and surveillance colonoscopy are uncommon. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8, 166-173 (2010
2. Rabeneck, L. et al. Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology 135, 1899-1906 (2008
3. Singh, H. et al. Colonoscopy and its complications across a Canadian regional health authority. Gastrointest. Endosc. 69, 665-671 (2009
4. Levin, T. R. et al. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann. Intern. Med. 145, 880-886 (2006) (Pubitemid 351639963)
5. Regula, J. et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 1863-1872 (2006 (Pubitemid 44664644)
6. Sieg, A., Hachmoeller-Eisenbach, U. & Eisenbach, T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest. Endosc. 53, 620-627 (2001
7. Viiala, C. H., Zimmerman, M., Cullen, D. J. & Hoffman, N. E. Complication rates of colonoscopy in an Australian teaching hospital environment. Intern. Med. J. 33, 355-359 (2003 (Pubitemid 37082795)
8. Spiegel, B. M. et al. Development and validation of a novel patient educational booklet to enhance colonoscopy preparation. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 106, 875-883 (2011
9. Froehlich, F., Wietlisbach, V., Gonvers, J. J., Burnand, B. & Vader, J. P. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 61, 378-384 (2005 (Pubitemid 40349029)
10. Harewood, G. C., Sharma, V. K. & de Garmo, P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest. Endosc. 58, 76-79 (2003 (Pubitemid 38208751)
11. Rex, D. K., Imperiale, T. F., Latinovich, D. R. & Bratcher, L. L. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 97, 1696-1700 (2002 (Pubitemid 34761391)
12. National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Endoscopy Quality Assurance Group. Quality assurance guidelines for colonoscopy publication no.6. National Health Service [online], http://www.cancerscreening. nhs.uk/bowel/publications/nhsbcsp06.pdf (2011
13. Aronchick, C. A. Bowel preparation scale. Gastrointest. Endosc. 60, 1037-1038 (2004
14. Lai, E. J., Calderwood, A. H., Doros, G., Fix, O. K. & Jacobson, B. C. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest. Endosc. 69, 620-625 (2009
15. Rostom, A. & Jolicoeur, E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest. Endosc. 59, 482-486 (2004 (Pubitemid 38437086)
16. Belsey, J., Epstein, O. & Heresbach, D. Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 25, 373-384 (2007 (Pubitemid 46184450)
17. Corporaal, S., Kleibeuker, J. H. & Koornstra, J. J. Low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid versus high-volume PEG as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 45, 1380-1386 (2010
18. Marmo, R. et al. Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions. Gastrointest. Endosc. 72, 313-320 (2010
19. Ell, C. et al. Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 103, 883-893 (2008 (Pubitemid 351501088)
20. Lawrance, I. C., Willert, R. P. & Murray, K. Bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: prospective randomized assessment of efficacy and of induced mucosal abnormality with three preparation agents. Endoscopy 43, 412-418 (2011
21. Kilgore, T. W. et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest. Endosc. 73, 1240-1245 (2011
22. Singh, H. et al. Propofol for sedation during colonoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2008, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD006268. doi:10.1002/14651858. CD006268.pub2 (2008)
23. Rex, D. K. et al. Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience. Gastroenterology 137, 1229-1237 (2009
24. Shah, S. G., Saunders, B. P., Brooker, J. C. & Williams, C. B. Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers. Gastrointest. Endosc. 52, 1-8 (2000 (Pubitemid 30469705)
25. Bretthauer, M. et al. NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy. Gut 50, 604-607 (2002 (Pubitemid 34407484)
26. Sumanac, K. et al. Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO2 insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO2 delivery system. Gastrointest. Endosc. 56, 190-194 (2002
27. Church, J. & Delaney, C. Randomized, controlled trial of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy. Dis. Colon Rectum 46, 322-326 (2003 (Pubitemid 36331649)
28. Baxter, N. N. et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann. Intern. Med. 150, 1-8 (2009
29. Brenner, H. et al. Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 102, 89-95 (2010
30. Singh, H. et al. The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology 139, 1128-1137 (2010
31. Neerincx, M. et al. Colonic work-up after incomplete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up. Endoscopy 42, 730-735 (2010
32. Rizek, R. et al. Rates of complete colonic evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy and their associated factors: a population-based study. Med. Care 47, 48-52 (2009
33. Shah, H. A., Paszat, L. F., Saskin, R., Stukel, T. A. & Rabeneck, L. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 132, 2297-2303 (2007 (Pubitemid 46890860)
34. Lieberman, D. A. et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 162-168 (2000 (Pubitemid 30489212)
35. Rex, D. K., Chen, S. C. & Overhiser, A. J. Colonoscopy technique in consecutive patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5, 879-883 (2007 (Pubitemid 47031065)
36. Shumaker, D. A., Zaman, A. & Katon, R. M. A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope. Gastrointest. Endosc. 55, 172-179 (2002 (Pubitemid 41115178)
37. Saifuddin, T., Trivedi, M., King, P. D., Madsen, R. & Marshall, J. B. Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults. Gastrointest. Endosc. 51, 314-317 (2000 (Pubitemid 30149222)
38. Marshall, J. B., Perez, R. A. & Madsen, R. W. Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in women who have undergone hysterectomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 55, 838-841 (2002 (Pubitemid 41127899)
39. Othman, M. O., Bradley, A. G., Choudhary, A., Hoffman, R. M. & Roy, P. K. Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy 41, 17-24 (2009
40. Shah, S. G., Brooker, J. C., Williams, C. B., Thapar, C. & Saunders, B. P. Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 356, 1718-1722 (2000
41. Shah, S. G. et al. Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on patient tolerance and sedation requirements during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 55, 832-837 (2002 (Pubitemid 41127898)
42. Wehrmann, T., Lechowicz, I., Martchenko, K. & Riphaus, A. Routine colonoscopy with a standard gastroscope. A randomized comparative trial in a western population. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 23, 443-446 (2008
43. Park, C. H. et al. Sedation-free colonoscopy using an upper endoscope is tolerable and effective in patients with low body mass index: a prospective randomized study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 101, 2504-2510 (2006
44. Keswani, R. N. Single-balloon colonoscopy versus repeat standard colonoscopy for previous incomplete colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 73, 507-512 (2011
45. Rex, D. K., Khashab, M., Raju, G. S., Pasricha, J. & Kozarek, R. Insertability and safety of a shape-locking device for colonoscopy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 100, 817-820 (2005 (Pubitemid 40592371)
46. Van Rijn, J. C. et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 101, 343-350 (2010 (Pubitemid 43381678)
47. Kaminski, M. F. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 1795-1803 (2010
48. Rex, D. K. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 63, S16-S28 (2006
49. Lee, R. H. et al. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos). Gastrointest. Endosc. 74, 128-134 (2011
50. East, J. E. et al. Dynamic patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal increase adenoma detection: a randomized, crossover trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 73, 456-463 (2011
51. Lee, J. M. et al. Effects of hyosine N.-butyl bromide on the detection of polyps during colonoscopy. Hepatogastroenterology 57, 90-94 (2010
52. East, J. E. et al. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 28, 768-776 (2008
53. Pellise, M. et al. Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 135, 1062-1068 (2008
54. Burke, C. A., Choure, A. G., Sanaka, M. R. & Lopez, R. A comparison of high-definition versus conventional colonoscopes for polyp detection. Dig. Dis. Sci. 55, 1716-1720 (2010
55. Tribonias, G. et al. Comparison of standard vs high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis. 12, e260-e266 (2010
56. Buchner, A. M. et al. High-definition colonoscopy detects colorectal polyps at a higher rate than standard white-light colonoscopy. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8, 364-370 (2010
57. Ignjatovic, A. et al. What is the most reliable imaging modality for small colonic polyp characterization? Study of white-light, autofluorescence, and narrow-band imaging. Endoscopy 43, 94-99 (2011
58. van den Broek, F. J. et al. Combining autofluorescence imaging and narrow-band imaging for the differentiation of adenomas from non-neoplastic colonic polyps among experienced and non-experienced endoscopists. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 104, 1498-1507 (2009
59. Kiesslich, R., von, B. M., Hahn, M., Hermann, G. & Jung, M. Chromoendoscopy with indigocarmine improves the detection of adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions in the colon. Endoscopy 33, 1001-1006 (2001 (Pubitemid 33121073)
60. Pohl, J. et al. Pancolonic chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine versus standard colonoscopy for detection of neoplastic lesions: a randomised two-centre trial. Gut 60, 485-490 (2011
61. Lecomte, T. et al. Chromoendoscopic colonoscopy for detecting preneoplastic lesions in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 3, 897-902 (2005 (Pubitemid 41219293)
62. East, J. E. et al. Narrow band imaging for colonoscopic surveillance in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Gut 57, 65-70 (2008
63. van den Broek, F. J., Reitsma, J. B., Curvers, W. L., Fockens, P. & Dekker, E. Systematic review of narrow-band imaging for the detection and differentiation of neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions in the colon (with videos). Gastrointest. Endosc. 69, 124-135 (2009
64. Hoffman, A. et al. High definition colonoscopy combined with i-Scan is superior in the detection of colorectal neoplasias compared with standard video colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 42, 827-833 (2010
65. Aminalai, A. et al. Live image processing does not increase adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison between FICE and conventional imaging (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 5, BECOP-5). Am. J. Gastroenterol. 105, 2383-2388 (2010
66. Chung, S. J. et al. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest. Endosc. 72, 136-142 (2010
67. Pohl, J. et al. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial. Gut 58, 73-78 (2009
68. Ramsoekh, D. et al. A back-to-back comparison of white light video endoscopy with autofluorescence endoscopy for adenoma detection in high-risk subjects. Gut 59, 785-793 (2010
69. van den Broek, F. J. et al. Clinical evaluation of endoscopic trimodal imaging for the detection and differentiation of colonic polyps. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 7, 288-295 (2009
70. Kondo, S. et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 102, 75-81 (2007 (Pubitemid 46072045)
71. Lee, Y. T. et al. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in comparison with regular colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 104, 41-46 (2009
72. Morgan, J., Thomas, K., Lee-Robichaud, H. & Nelson, R. L. Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for investigation of gastrointestinal tract conditions. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. Issue 2. Art. No.: CD008211. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008211.pub2. (2011
73. Hewett, D. G. & Rex, D. K. Cap-fitted colonoscopy: a randomized, tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest. Endosc. 72, 775-781 (2010
74. Tee, H. P. et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy. World J. Gastroenterol. 16, 3905-3910 (2010
75. DeMarco, D. C. et al. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group. Gastrointest. Endosc. 71, 542-550 (2010
76. Waye, J. D. et al. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos). Gastrointest. Endosc. 71, 551-556 (2010
77. Leufkens, A. M. et al. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 73, 480-489 (2011
78. Endoscopy Classification Review Group. Update on the Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy 37, 570-578 (2005
79. Winawer, S. J. et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N. Engl. J. Med. 329, 1977-1981 (1993 (Pubitemid 24015040)
80. Iqbal, C. W. et al. Surgical management and outcomes of 165 colonoscopic perforations from a single institution. Arch. Surg. 143, 701-706 (2008 (Pubitemid 352040246)
81. Pabby, A. et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 61, 385-391 (2005 (Pubitemid 40349030)
82. Farrar, W. D., Sawhney, M. S., Nelson, D. B., Lederle, F. A. & Bond, J. H. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 4, 1259-1264 (2006 (Pubitemid 44512220)
83. Ignjatovic, A. et al. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 10, 1171-1178 (2009
84. Efthymiou, M., Taylor, A. C., Desmond, P. V., Allen, P. B. & Chen, R. Y. Biopsy forceps is inadequate for the resection of diminutive polyps. Endoscopy 43, 312-316 (2011
85. Moss, A. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 140, 1909-1918 (2011
86. Saito, Y. et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest. Endosc. 72, 1217-1225 (2010
87. Singh, N., Harrison, M. & Rex, D. K. A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists. Gastrointest. Endosc. 60, 414-418 (2004 (Pubitemid 39164252)
88. Hewett, D. G. & Rex, D. K. Colonoscopy and diminutive polyps: hot or cold biopsy or snare? Do I send to pathology? Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 9, 102-105 (2011
89. Woods, A., Sanowski, R. A., Wadas, D. D., Manne, R. K. & Friess, S. W. Eradication of diminutive polyps: a prospective evaluation of bipolar coagulation versus conventional biopsy removal. Gastrointest. Endosc. 35, 536-540 (1989 (Pubitemid 20072410)
90. Yoo, T. W. et al. Clinical significance of small colorectal adenoma less than 10 mm: the KASID study. Hepatogastroenterology 54, 418-421 (2007
91. Lieberman, D., Moravec, M., Holub, J., Michaels, L. & Eisen, G. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 135, 1100-1105 (2008
92. Wadas, D. D. & Sanowski, R. A. Complications of the hot biopsy forceps technique. Gastrointest. Endosc. 34, 32-37 (1988 (Pubitemid 18063237)
93. Nelson, A. M. Delayed hemorrhage following "hot biopsy" of a diminutive colonic polyp. Gastrointest. Endosc. 36, 418 (1990
94. Di Giorgio, P. et al. Detachable snare versus epinephrine injection in the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding: a randomized and controlled study. Endoscopy 36, 860-863 (2004 (Pubitemid 39307134)
95. Paspatis, G. A. et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of adrenaline injection in combination with detachable snare versus adrenaline injection alone in the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in large colonic polyps. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 101, 2805 (2006
96. Matsushita, M. et al. Ineffective use of a detachable snare for colonoscopic polypectomy of large polyps. Gastrointest. Endosc. 47, 496-499 (1998 (Pubitemid 28287569)
97. Heresbach, D. et al. A national survey of endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasia. Endoscopy 42, 806-813 (2010
98. Tanaka, S. et al. Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment of superficially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm. Gastrointest. Endosc. 54, 62-66 (2001 (Pubitemid 33663842)
99. Uraoka, T. et al. Endoscopic indications for endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading tumours in the colorectum. Gut 55, 1592-1597 (2006 (Pubitemid 44629209)
100. Moss, A., Bourke, M. J. & Metz, A. J. A randomized, double-blind trial of succinylated gelatin submucosal injection for endoscopic resection of large sessile polyps of the colon. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 105, 2375-2382 (2010
101. Swan, M. P., Bourke, M. J., Alexander, S., Moss, A. & Williams, S. J. Large refractory colonic polyps: is it time to change our practice? A prospective study of the clinical and economic impact of a tertiary referral colonic mucosal resection and polypectomy service (with videos). Gastrointest. Endosc. 70, 1128-1136 (2009
102. Mannath, J., Subramanian, V., Singh, R., Telakis, E. & Ragunath, K. Polyp recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of sessile and flat colonic adenomas. Dig. Dis. Sci. 56, 2389-2395 (2011
103. Brooker, J. C. et al. Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations. Gastrointest. Endosc. 55, 371-375 (2002 (Pubitemid 41115150)
104. Onozato, Y. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancers and large flat adenomas. Endoscopy 38, 980-986 (2006 (Pubitemid 44615232)
105. Imagawa, A. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: results and degrees of technical difficulty as well as success. Endoscopy 38, 987-990 (2006 (Pubitemid 44615233)
106. Saito, Y. et al. Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest. Endosc. 66, 966-973 (2007 (Pubitemid 47610764)
107. Deprez, P. H. et al. Current practice with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe: position statement from a panel of experts. Endoscopy 42, 853-858 (2010
108. Niimi, K. et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms. Endoscopy 42, 723-729 (2010
109. Voermans, R. P., Vergouwe, F., Breedveld, P., Fockens, P. & van Berge Henegouwen, M. I. Comparison of endoscopic closure modalities for standardized colonic perforations in a porcine colon model. Endoscopy 43, 217-222 (2011).