A comparison of high-definition versus conventional colonoscopes for polyp detection

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1716-1720

  Burke, Carol A ^a   Choure, Anuja G ^a   Sanaka, Madhusudhan R ^a   Lopez, Rocio ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Colonoscopy; High definition colonoscopy; Polyp detection; Wide angle colonoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLONOSCOPE; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL POLYP; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL COLONOSCOPE; FEMALE; HIGH DEFINITION COLONOSCOPE; HUMAN; HYPERPLASIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POLYP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ADENOMA; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPES; COLONOSCOPY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 77954427654     PISSN: 01632116     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-0941-y     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. SJ Winawer AG Zauber MN Ho, et al. 1993 Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study workgroup N Engl J Med 329 1977 1981 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2Fmslamug%3D%3D 8247072 (Pubitemid 24015040)
2. G Postic D Lewin C Bickerstaff MB Wallace 2002 Colonoscopic miss rates determined by direct comparison of colonoscopy with colon resection specimens Am J Gastroenterol 97 3182 3185 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07128.x 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07128.x 12492208 (Pubitemid 35424594)
3. DK Rex CS Cutler GT Lemmel, et al. 1997 Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies Gastroenterology 112 24 28 10.1016/S0016-5085(97)70214-2 10.1016/S0016-5085(97)70214-2 1:STN:280: DyaK2s7jt12kuw%3D%3D 8978338
4. DA Lieberman DG Weiss WV Harford, et al. 2007 Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy Gastroenterology 133 1077 1085 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.07.006 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.07.006 17698067 (Pubitemid 47494453)
5. B Bressler LF Paszat Z Chen, et al. 2007 Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors; a population-based analysis Gastroenterology 132 96 102 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.027 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.027 17241863 (Pubitemid 46108740)
6. M Pellise G Fernandez-Esparrach A Cardenas, et al. 2008 Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial Gastroenterology 135 1062 1068 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.090 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.090 18725223
7. VP Deenadayalu V Chadalawada DK Rex 2004 170 degree wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates Am J Gastroenterol 99 2138 2142 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40430.x 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40430.x 15554993 (Pubitemid 39524703)
8. J East M Stavrindis S Thomas-Gibson, et al. 2008 A comparative study of standard versus high-definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique Aliment Pharmacol Ther 28 768 776 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03789.x 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03789.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1crjs1ejsw%3D%3D 18715401
9. B Levin DA Lieberman B McFarland, et al. 2008 Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology Gastroenterology 134 1570 1595 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.002 10.1053/j.gastro. 2008.02.002 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXntVWgs74%3D 18384785 (Pubitemid 351615355)