Impact of Wide-Angle, High-Definition Endoscopy in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Neoplasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Gastroenterology

Volumn 135, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1062-1068

  Pellisé, Maria ^a   Fernández Esparrach, Glòria ^a   Cárdenas, Andrés ^a   Sendino, Oriol ^a   Ricart, Elena ^a   Vaquero, Eva ^a   Gimeno García, Antonio Z ^a   de Miguel, Cristina Rodríguez ^a   Zabalza, Michel ^a   Ginès, Angels ^a   Piqué, Josep M ^a   Llach, Josep ^a   Castells, Antoni ^a  

^a Institut Clinic de Malalties Digestives i Metaboliques   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CECUM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPE; COLORECTAL TUMOR; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ENDOSCOPE; ENDOSCOPY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL DYSPLASIA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM POLYP;

EID: 53049103225     PISSN: 00165085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.090     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Jemal A., Murray T., Ward E., et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 55 (2005) 10-30
2. Morson B.C. The polyp-cancer sequence in the large bowel. Proc R Soc Med 67 (1974) 451-457
3. Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., O'Brien M.J., et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 328 (1993) 901-906
4. Muller A.D., and Sonnenberg A. Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy. A case-control study of 32,702 veterans. Ann Intern Med 123 (1995) 904-910
5. Citarda F., Tomaselli G., Capocaccia R., et al., Italian Multicentre Study Group. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 48 (2001) 812-815
6. Thiis-Evensen E., Hoff G.S., Sauar J., et al. Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I. Scand J Gastroenterol 34 (1999) 414-420
7. Singh H., Turner D., Xue L., et al. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA 295 (2006) 2366-2373
8. Robertson D.J., Greenberg E.R., Beach M., et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 129 (2005) 34-41
9. Pickhardt P.J., Nugent P.A., Mysliwiec P.A., et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 141 (2004) 352-359
10. Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., Ho M.N., et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329 (1993) 1977-1981
11. Hixson L.J., Fennerty M.B., Sampliner R.E., et al. Two-year incidence of colon adenomas developing after tandem colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 89 (1994) 687-691
12. Hixson L.J., Fennerty M.B., Sampliner R.E., et al. Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst 82 (1990) 1769-1772
13. Rex D.K., Cutler C.S., Lemmel G.T., et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112 (1997) 24-28
14. Harewood G.C., Sharma V.K., and de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 58 (2003) 76-79
15. Froehlich F., Wietlisbach V., Gonvers J.J., et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 61 (2005) 378-384
16. Rex D.K. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 2866-2877
17. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Doughty A.S., et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 2533-2541
18. Matsushita M., Hajiro K., Okazaki K., et al. Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap. Endoscopy 30 (1998) 444-447
19. Rex D.K., and Helbig C.C. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 133 (2007) 42-47
20. Adler A., Pohl H., Papanikolaou I.S., et al. Randomized study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does NBI induce a learning effect?. Gut 57 (2008) 59-64
21. Deenadayalu V.P., Chadalawada V., and Rex D.K. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 99 (2004) 2138-2142
22. Rex D.K., Chadalawada V., and Helper D.J. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 98 (2003) 2000-2005
23. Stoffel E.M., Stockwell D.H., Normolle D.P., et al. Chromoendoscopic colonoscopy detects more adenomas than conventional colonoscopy: a randomized trial of back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 130 (2006) A48
24. Lecomte T., Cellier C., Meatchi T., et al. Chromoendoscopic colonoscopy for detecting preneoplastic lesions in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3 (2005) 897-902
25. Axelrad A.M., Fleischer D.E., Geller A.J., et al. High-resolution chromoendoscopy for the diagnosis of diminutive colon polyps: implications for colon cancer screening. Gastroenterology 110 (1996) 1253-1258
26. Kiesslich R., von Bergh M., Hahn M., et al. Chromoendoscopy with indigocarmine improves the detection of adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions in the colon. Endoscopy 33 (2001) 1001-1006
27. Hurlstone D.P., Cross S.S., Slater R., et al. Detecting diminutive colorectal lesions at colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial of pan-colonic versus targeted chromoscopy. Gut 53 (2004) 376-380
28. Brooker J.C., Saunders B.P., Shah S.G., et al. Total colonic dye-spray increases the detection of diminutive adenomas during routine colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 56 (2002) 333-338
29. Hurlstone D.P., Cross S.S., Adam I., et al. Efficacy of high magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy for the diagnosis of neoplasia in flat and depressed lesions of the colorectum: a prospective analysis. Gut 53 (2004) 284-290
30. Lapalus M.G., Helbert T., Napoleon B., et al. Does chromoendoscopy with structure enhancement improve the colonoscopic adenoma detection rate?. Endoscopy 38 (2006) 444-448
31. Le Rhun M., Coron E., Parlier D., et al. High resolution colonoscopy with chromoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for the detection of colonic neoplasia: a randomized study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4 (2006) 349-354
32. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon. Gastrointest Endosc 58 (2003) S3-S43
33. Bossuyt P.M., Reitsma J.B., Bruns D.E., et al. Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Clin Radiol 58 (2003) 575-580
34. Sonwalkar S., Rotimi O., and Rembacken B.J. Characterization of colonic polyps at conventional (nonmagnifying) colonoscopy after spraying with 0.2% indigo carmine dye. Endoscopy 38 (2006) 1218-1223
35. Rembacken B.J., Fujii T., Cairns A., et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 355 (2000) 1211-1214