A randomized, double-blind trial of succinylated gelatin submucosal injection for endoscopic resection of large sessile polyps of the colon

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 105, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2375-2382

  Moss, Alan ^a   Bourke, Michael J ^a   Metz, Andrew J ^a  

^a WESTMEAD HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GELATIN SUCCINATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ABSENCE OF SIDE EFFECTS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON ADENOCARCINOMA; COLON POLYP; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TUMOR VOLUME;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLON; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; GELATIN; HUMANS; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; MALE; SUCCINATES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78149284502     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.319     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Rex DK. Have we defined best colonoscopic polypectomy practice in theUnited States? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007 ; 5 : 674-7.
2. Swan MP , Bourke MJ , Alexander S et al. Large refractory colonic polyps:is it time to change our practice? A prospective study of the clinical andeconomic impact of a tertiary referral colonic mucosal resection andpolypectomy service (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2009 ; 70 : 1128-36.
3. Arebi N , Swain D , Suzuki N et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of 161cases of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps. Scand J Gastroenterol2007 ; 42 : 859-66.
4. Kaltenbach T , Friedland S , Maheshwari A et al. Short-and long-term outcomesof standardized EMR of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectallesions > or = 1 cm (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2007 ; 65 : 857-65.
5. Bourke MJ. Current status of colonic endoscopic mucosal resection in theWest and the interface wiThendoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc2009 ; 21 (Suppl 1) : S27-32.
6. Moss A , Bourke MJ , Tran K et al. Lesion isolation by circumferential submucosalincision prior to EMR (CSI-EMR) substantially enhances en blocresection rates for 40 mm colonic lesions. Endoscopy 2010 ; 42 : 400-4.
7. Kantsevoy SV , Adler DG , Conway JD et al. Endoscopic mucosal resectionand endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2008 ; 68 : 11-8.
8. Waye JD , Rex DK , Williams CB. Colonoscopy Principles and Practice. Blackwell Publishing: Malden , 2003.
9. Moss A , Bourke M , Kwan V et al. Succinylated gelatin substantiallyincreases en bloc resection size in colonic endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR): a randomized blinded trial in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc2010 ; 71 : 589-95.
10. Participants in the Paris Workshop. The Paris endoscopic classification ofsuperficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003 ; 58 : S3-43.
11. Alexander S , Bourke MJ , Williams SJ et al. EMR of large, sessile, sporadicnonampullary duodenal adenomas: technical aspects and long-term outcome(with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2009 ; 69 : 66-73.
12. Conio M , Repici A , Demarquay JF et al. EMR of large sessile colorectalpolyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2004 ; 60 : 234-41.
13. Bergmann U , Beger HG. Endoscopic mucosal resection for advancednon-polypoid colorectal adenoma and early stage carcinoma. Surg Endosc2003 ; 17 : 475-9.
14. Seewald S , Soehendra N. Perforation: part and parcel of endoscopic resection?Gastrointest Endosc 2006 ; 63 : 602-5.
15. Bergman JJ. How to justify endoscopic submucosal dissection in the Westernworld. Endoscopy 2009 ; 41 : 988-90.
16. Yamamoto H , Yube T , Isoda N et al. A novel method of endoscopic mucosalresection using sodium hyaluronate. Gastrointest Endosc 1999 ; 50 : 251-6.
17. Yamamoto H , Kawata H , Sunada K et al. Successful en-bloc resectionof large superficial tumors in the stomach and colon using sodiumhyaluronate and small-caliber-tip transparent hood. Endoscopy2003 ; 35 : 690-4.
18. Yamamoto H , Sekine Y , Higashizawa T et al. Successful en bloc resection ofa large superficial gastric cancer by using sodium hyaluronate and electrocauteryincision forceps. Gastrointest Endosc 2001 ; 54 : 629-32.
19. Fujishiro M , Yahagi N , Nakamura M et al. Successful outcomes of a novelendoscopic treatment for GI tumors: endoscopic submucosal dissectionwith a mixture of high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid, glycerin, andsugar. Gastrointest Endosc 2006 ; 63 : 243-9.
20. Uraoka T , Fujii T , Saito Y et al. Effectiveness of glycerol as a submucosalinjection for EMR. Gastrointest Endosc 2005 ; 61 : 736-40.
21. Fujishiro M , Yahagi N , Kashimura K et al. Comparison of various submucosalinjection solutions for maintaining mucosal elevation duringendoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 2004 ; 36 : 579-83.
22. Feitoza AB , Gostout CJ , Burgart LJ et al. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose: abetter submucosal fluid cushion for endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2003 ; 57 : 41-7.
23. Fujishiro M , Yahagi N , Kashimura K et al. Tissue damage of diff erent submucosalinjection solutions for EMR. Gastrointest Endosc 2005 ; 62 : 933-42.
24. Giday SA , Magno P , Buscaglia JM et al. Is blood the ideal submucosalcushioning agent? A comparative study in a porcine model. Endoscopy2006 ; 38 : 1230-4.
25. Giday SA , Shin EJ , Kantsevoy SV. Autologous blood provides the best cushioningEffect for polypectomy: a prospective randomized controlled humantrial. Gastrointestl Endosc 2008 ; 67 : AB139-40.
26. Sato T. A novel method of endoscopic mucosal resection assisted bysubmucosal injection of autologous blood (blood patch EMR). Dis ColonRectum 2006 ; 49 : 1636-41.
27. Katsinelos P , Kountouras J , Paroutoglou G et al. A comparative study of50% dextrose and normal saline solution on their ability to create submucosalfluid cushions for endoscopic resection of sessile rectosigmoid polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2008 ; 68 : 692-8.
28. Ring J , Messmer K. Incidence and severity of anaphylactoid reactions tocolloid volume substitutes. Lancet 1977 ; 1 : 466-9.
29. Saito Y , Uraoka T , Matsuda T et al. Endoscopic treatment of large superfi-cial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections(with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2007 ; 66 : 966-73.
30. Fujishiro M , Yahagi N , Kakushima N et al. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosaldissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in 200 consecutivecases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007 ; 5 : 678-83 ; quiz 45.
31. Tanaka S , Oka S , Kaneko I et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection forcolorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization. Gastrointest Endosc2007 ; 66 : 100-7.
32. Tanaka S , Haruma K , Oka S et al. Clinicopathologic features and endoscopictreatment of superficially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than20 mm. Gastrointest Endosc 2001 ; 54 : 62-6.