High-Definition Colonoscopy Detects Colorectal Polyps at a Higher Rate Than Standard White-Light Colonoscopy

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 364-370

  Buchner, Anna M ^a   Shahid, Muhammad W ^a   Heckman, Michael G ^a   McNeil, Rebecca B ^a   Cleveland, Patrick ^a   Gill, Kanwar R ^a   Schore, Anthony ^a   Ghabril, Marwan ^a   Raimondo, Massimo ^a   Gross, Seth A ^a   Wallace, Michael B ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Adenoma Detection; Colorectal Neoplasia

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HIGH DEFINITION COLONOSCOPY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCREENING; STANDARD WHITE LIGHT COLONOSCOPY;

ADENOMA; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTESTINAL POLYPS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77949658724     PISSN: 15423565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59 (2009) 225-249
2. Rex D.K., Cutler C.S., Lemmel G.T., et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112 (1997) 24-28
3. Rex D.K., Chadalawada V., and Helper D.J. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 98 (2003) 2000-2005
4. Wallace M.B. Improving colorectal adenoma detection: technology or technique?. Gastroenterology 132 (2007) 1221-1223
5. Gross S., Buchner A., and Cangemi J.e.a. A prospective randomized back-to-back trial comparing narrow band imaging to conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection. Gastroenterology 134 (2008) A47-A48
6. Faigel D.O., Pike I.M., Baron T.H., et al. Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) S3-S9
7. Vittinghoff E., and McCulloch C.E. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol 165 (2007) 710-718
8. Pellise M., Fernandez-Esparrach G., Cardenas A., et al. Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 135 (2008) 1062-1068
9. Le Rhun M., Coron E., Parlier D., et al. High resolution colonoscopy with chromoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for the detection of colonic neoplasia: a randomized study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4 (2006) 349-354
10. Adler A., Pohl H., Papanikolaou I.S., et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?. Gut 57 (2008) 59-64
11. East J.E., Stavrindis M., Thomas-Gibson S., et al. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 28 (2008) 768-776
12. Paggi S., Radaelli F., Amato A., et al. The impact of narrow band imaging in screening colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7 (2009) 1049-1054
13. Rex D.K., and Helbig C.C. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 133 (2007) 42-47
14. Deenadayalu V.P., Chadalawada V., and Rex D.K. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 99 (2004) 2138-2142
15. Fatima H., Rex D.K., Rothstein R., et al. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6 (2008) 109-114
16. Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., Ho M.N., et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329 (1993) 1977-1981
17. van Rijn J.C., Reitsma J.B., Stoker J., et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 343-350
18. Kudo S.E., and Kashida H. Flat and depressed lesions of the colorectum. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3 (2005) S33-S36
19. Read T.E., Read J.D., and Butterly L.F. Importance of adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med 336 (1997) 8-12
20. Church J.M. Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 47 (2004) 481-485
21. Butterly L.F., Chase M.P., Pohl H., et al. Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4 (2006) 343-348
22. Wallace M.B., Kemp J.A., Trnka Y.M., et al. Is colonoscopy indicated for small adenomas found by screening flexible sigmoidoscopy?. Ann Intern Med 129 (1998) 273-278
23. Chen S.C., and Rex D.K. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 102 (2007) 856-861
24. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., and Greenlaw R.L. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6 (2008) 1091-1098
25. Sox H.C., and Greenfield S. Comparative effectiveness research: a report from the Institute of Medicine. Ann Intern Med 151 (2009) 203-205
26. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Doughty A.S., et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 2533-2541
27. Sawhney M.S., Cury M.S., Neeman N., et al. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection. Gastroenterology 135 (2008) 1892-1898
28. Buchner A., Shahid M., Gill K., et al. The use of high definition white light colonoscopy leads to higher adenoma detection rates compared to standard definition white light colonoscopy. An effectiveness study in 2011 patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2009) (in press)