Live image processing does not increase adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: A randomized comparison between FICE and conventional imaging (Berlin colonoscopy project 5, BECOP-5)

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 105, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2383-2388

  Aminalai, Alireza ^a   Rösch, Thomas ^b   Aschenbeck, Jens ^a   Mayr, Michael ^a   Drossel, Rolf ^a   Schröder, Andreas ^a   Scheel, Matthias ^a   Treytnar, Doris ^a   Gauger, Ulrich ^c   Stange, Gabriela ^c   Simon, Frank ^c   Adler, Andreas ^c  

^a Private Practice   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^c CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPE; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE PRACTICE; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; WORK EXPERIENCE;

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONOSCOPY; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 78149285183     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.273     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Levin B , Lieberman DA , McFarland B , et al. , American Cancer SocietyColorectal Cancer Advisory Group; the US Multi-Society Task Force, andthe American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. Screeningand Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and AdenomatousPolyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline From the American Cancer Society,the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the AmericanCollege of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008 ; 134 : 1570-95.
2. Van Rijn JC , Reitsma JB , Stoker J et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandemcolonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006 ; 101 : 343-50.
3. Bretagne JF , Ponchon T. Do we need to embrace adenoma detection rateas the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy? Endoscopy2008 ; 40 : 523-8.
4. Adler A , Aschenbeck J , Yenerim T et al. Narrow-band versus white-lighthigh definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: aprospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2009 ; 136 : 410.e1-6.e1.
5. Deenadayalu VP , Chadalawada V , Rex DK. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope:Effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004 ; 99 : 2138-42.
6. Lee YT , Lai LH , Hui AJ et al. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy incomparison with regular colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.Am J Gastroenterol 2009 ; 104 : 41-6.
7. Lapalus MG , Helbert T , Napoleon B , et al. , Soci é t é Fran ç aise d ' EndoscopieDigestive. Does chromoendoscopy with structure enhancement improvecolonoscopic adenoma detection rate? Endoscopy 2006 ; 38 : 444-8.
8. Le Rhun M , Coron E , Parlier D et al. High resolution colonoscopy withchromoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for the detection of colonicneoplasia: a randomized study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006 ; 4 : 349-54.
9. Pohl J , Lotterer E , Balzer C et al. Computed virtual chromoendoscopyversus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: arandomised multicentre trial. Gut 2009 ; 58 : 73-8.
10. Cha JM , Lee JI , Joo KR et al. A prospective randomized study on computedvirtual chromoendoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy for thedetection of small colorectal adenomas. Dig Dis Sci 2009 ; e-pub ahead ofprint 16 October 2009.
11. Adler A , Pohl H , Papanikolaou IS et al. A prospective randomized studyon narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenomadetection: does NBI induce a learning Effect? Gut 2008 ; 57 : 59-64.
12. Inoue T , Murano M , Murano N et al. Comparative study of conventionalcolonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detectionof neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol2008 ; 43 : 45-50.
13. Rex DK , Helbig CC. High yield of small and flat adenomas with highdefinition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging.Gastroenterology 2007 ; 133 : 42-7.
14. Adler A , Aminalai A , Aschenbeck J et al. Use of new technology mayimprove colon adenoma detection rates: a comparative study on 4700screening colonoscopies (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 4, BECOP-4).(submitted).
15. East J , Stavrindis M , Th omas-Gibson S et al. A comparative study of standardversus high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polypdetection with optimized withdrawal technique. Aliment Pharmacol Ther2008 ; 28 : 768-76.
16. Bianchi LK , Yen EF , Roy HK et al. High-definition endoscopyimproves adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc 2008 ; 67 : AB305-6(abstract).
17. Randolph AC , Merrill T , Gerkin R et al. Polyp detection rates do increasewith the use of high definition, wide-angle colonoscopes. GastrointestEndosc 2008 ; 67 : AB310 (abstract).
18. Buchner AM , Ghabril MS , Gross SA et al. Does the use of high definitionwhite light colonoscopy lead to higher adenoma detection rates comparedto standard definition white light colonoscopy. An Effectiveness study in1225 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2008 ; 67 : AB130 (abstract).
19. Shah SG , Brooker JC , Williams CB et al. Effect of magnetic endoscopeimaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial.Lancet 2000 ; 356 : 1718-22.
20. van den Broek FJ , Fockens P , Dekker E. Review article: new developments incolonic imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007 ; 26 (Suppl 2) : 91-9. statt 30-37.
21. Tischendorf JJ , Wasmuth HE , Koch A et al. Value of magnifying chromoendoscopyand narrow band imaging (NBI) in classifying colorectal polyps: aprospective controlled study. Endoscopy 2007 ; 39 : 1092-6.
22. Chiu HM , Chang CY , Chen CC et al. A prospective comparative study ofnarrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy inthe diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Gut 2007 ; 56 : 373-9.
23. Su MY , Hsu CM , Ho YP et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy,chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in diff erentialdiagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol2006 ; 101 : 2711-6.
24. Rastogi A , Bansal A , Wani S et al. Narrow-band imaging colonoscopy\-apilot feasibility study for the detection of polyps and correlation of surfacepatterns with polyp histologic diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2008 ; 67 : 280-6.