Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 542-550

  DeMarco, Daniel C ^a   Odstrcil, Elizabeth ^a   Lara, Luis F ^a   Bass, David ^a   Herdman, Chase ^a   Kinney, Timothy ^a   Gupta, Kapil ^a   Wolf, Leon ^a   Dewar, Thomas ^a   Deas, Thomas M ^a   Mehta, Manoj K ^a   Anwer, M Badar ^a   Pellish, Randall ^a   Hamilton, J Kent ^a   Polter, Daniel ^a   Reddy, K Gautham ^a   Hanan, Ira ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CECUM; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPEN STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETROSCOPE; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; UNITED STATES; VIDEORECORDING;

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPES; COLONOSCOPY; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 77249118806     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.021     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., et al. Cancer Statistics, 2009. Ca Cancer J Clin 59 (2009) 225-249
2. Rex D.K., Bond J.H., Winawer S., et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97 (2002) 1296-1308
3. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 149 (2008) 627-637
4. Rex D.K., Johnson D.A., Inadomi J.M., et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2008. Am J Gastroenterol 104 (2009) 739-750
5. Levin B., Lieberman D.A., Winawer S.J., et al., American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58 (2008) 130-160
6. Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., Rex D.K., et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 130 (2006) 1872-1885
7. Hixson L.J., Fennerty M.B., Sampliner R.E., et al. Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 37 (1991) 125-127
8. Rex D.K., Cutler C.S., Mark D.G., et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112 (1997) 24-28
9. Van Rijn J.C., Reitsma J.B., Dekker E., et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systemic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 343-350
10. Heresbach D., Barrioz T., Ponchon T., et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 40 (2008) 284-290
11. Soetikno R.M., Kaltenbach T., Friedland S., et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA 299 (2008) 1027-1035
12. Van Gelder R.E., Nio C.Y., Stoker J., et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 127 (2004) 41-48
13. Pickhardt P.J., Nugent P.A., Schindler W.R., et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 141 (2004) 352-359
14. Pabby A., Schoen R.E., Schatzkin A., et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc 61 (2005) 385-391
15. Postic G., Lewin D., Wallace M.B., et al. Colonoscopic miss rates determined by direct comparison of colonoscopy with colon resection specimens. Am J Gastroenterol 97 (2002) 3182-3185
16. Bressler B., Paszat L.F., Rabeneck L., et al. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 127 (2004) 452-456
17. Triadafilopoulos G., Watts H.D., Van Dam J., et al. A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device (Third Eye Retroscope) improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomic models of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 139-144
18. Triadafilopoulos G., and Li J. A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Third Eye retrograde auxiliary imaging system during colonoscopy. Endoscopy 40 (2008) 478-482
19. Waye J.D., Russell I.H., Fleischer D.E., et al. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 71 (2010) 551-556
20. Rostom A., and Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 59 (2004) 482-486
21. Harewood G.C., Sharma V.K., and de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 58 (2003) 76-79
22. Froehlich F., Wietlisbach V., Vader J.P., et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 61 (2005) 378-384
23. Rex D.K. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 51 (2000) 33-36
24. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Doughty A.S., et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 2533-2541
25. Sanchez W., Harewood G.C., and Petersen B.T. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 99 (2004) 1941-1945
26. Simmons D.T., Harewood G.C., Baron T.H., et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24 (2006) 965-971
27. Schatzkin A., Lanza E., Corle D., et al. Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med 342 (2000) 1149-1155
28. Lieberman D.A., Weiss D.G., Bond J.H., et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 343 (2000) 162-168
29. Rex D.K. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 2866-2877
30. Westerhof J., Koornstra J.J., and Weersma R.K. Can we reduce capsule endoscopy reading times?. Gastrointest Endosc 69 (2009) 497-502