Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 136-142

  Chung, Su Jin ^a   Kim, Donghee ^a   Song, Ji Hyun ^a   Park, Min Jung ^a   Kim, Young Sun ^a   Kim, Joo Sung ^a   Jung, Hyun Chae ^a   Song, In Sung ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CHROMOENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUJI INTELLIGENT COLOR ENHANCEMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VIRTUAL REALITY; WHITE LIGHT ENDOSCOPY; ADENOMA; AGED; COLONIC POLYPS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INTESTINE MUCOSA; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOUTH KOREA; VIDEORECORDING;

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 77954085584     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.055     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. van Rijn J.C., Reitsma J.B., Stoker J., et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 343-350
2. Robertson D.J., Greenberg E.R., Beach M., et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 129 (2005) 34-41
3. Singh H., Turner D., Xue L., et al. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA 295 (2006) 2366-2373
4. Kaltenbach T., Sano Y., Friedland S., et al., American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technology assessment on image-enhanced endoscopy. Gastroenterology 134 (2008) 327-340
5. Pohl J., May A., Rabenstein T., et al. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy: a new tool for enhancing tissue surface structures. Endoscopy 39 (2007) 80-83
6. Pohl J., Nguyen-Tat M., Pech O., et al. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of small colorectal lesions: a prospective comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol 103 (2008) 562-569
7. Pohl J., Lotterer E., Balzer C., et al. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial. Gut 58 (2009) 73-78
8. Togashi K., Osawa H., Koinuma K., et al. A comparison of conventional endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and the optimal-band imaging system for the differentiation of neoplastic and non-neoplastic colonic polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 69 Suppl 3 (2009) 734-741
9. Adler A., Pohl H., Papanikolaou I.S., et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?. Gut 57 (2008) 59-64
10. East J.E., Suzuki N., Stavrinidis M., et al. Narrow band imaging for colonoscopic surveillance in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Gut 57 (2008) 65-70
11. Inoue T., Murano M., Murano N., et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomised, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 43 (2008) 45-50
12. Adler A., Aschenbeck J., Yenerim T., et al. Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology 136 (2009) 410-416
13. Paggi S., Radaelli F., Amato A., et al. The impact of narrow band imaging in screening colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7 (2009) 1049-1054
14. van den Broek F.J., Reitsma J.B., Curvers W.L., et al. Systematic review of narrow-band imaging for the detection and differentiation of neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions in the colon. (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 69 (2009) 124-135
15. Kang H.W., Kim D., Kim H.J., et al. Visceral obesity and insulin resistance as risk factors for colorectal adenoma, a cross-sectional, case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 105 (2010) 178-187
16. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Doughty A.S., et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 2533-2541
17. Rex D.K. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 2866-2877
18. Ell C., Fischbach W., Bronisch H.J., et al. Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 103 (2008) 883-893
19. Heresbach D., Barrioz T., Lapalus M.G., et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 40 (2008) 284-290
20. Kaltenbach T., Friedland S., and Soetikno R. A randomized tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rate. Gut 57 (2008) 1406-1412
21. Lieberman D.A., Prindiville S., Weiss D.G., et al., VA Cooperative Study Group 380. Risk factors for advanced colonic neoplasia and hyperplastic polyps in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 290 (2003) 2959-2967
22. Regula J., Rupinski M., Kraszewska E., et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 1863-1872
23. Rex D.K., Petrini J.L., Baron T.H., et al., ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 873-885
24. Chen S.C., and Rex D.K. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 102 (2007) 856-861
25. Diebold M.D., Samalin E., Merle C., et al. Colonic flat neoplasia: frequency and concordance between endoscopic appearance and histological diagnosis in a French prospective series. Am J Gastroenterol 99 (2004) 1795-1800
26. Soetikno R., Friedland S., Kaltenbach T., et al. Nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms. Gastroenterology 130 (2006) 566-576
27. Sano Y., Muto M., Tajiri H., et al. Optical/digital chromoendoscopy during colonoscopy using narrow-band image system. Dig Endosc 17 (2005) S43-S48
28. Chiu H.M., Chang C.Y., Chen C.C., et al. A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Gut 56 (2007) 373-379
29. Hirarta M., Tanaka S., Oka S., et al. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for diagnosis of colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 988-995
30. Kanao H., Tanaka S., Oka S., et al. Narrow-band imaging magnification predicts the histology and invasion depth of colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 69 (2009) 631-636
31. Wada Y., Kudo S.E., Kashida H., et al. Diagnosis of colorectal lesions with the magnifying narrow-band imaging system. Gastrointest Endosc 70 (2009) 522-531
32. Whiting P., Rutjes A.W., Reitsma J.B., et al. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 140 (2004) 189-202