Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: A randomised multicentre trial

Gut

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 73-78

  Pohl, J ^a,f   Lotterer, E ^b   Balzer, C ^b   Sackmann, M ^c   Schmidt, K D ^c   Gossner, L ^d   Schaab, C ^d   Frieling, T ^e   Medve, M ^e   Mayer, G ^a   Nguyen Tat, M ^a   Ell, C ^a  

^a DR HORST SCHMIDT KLINIKEN   (Germany)

^b SANA KLINIKUM OFFENBACH   (Germany)

^c KLINIKUM BAMBERG   (Germany)

^d Klinikum Karlsruhe   (Germany)

^e Klinikum Krefeld   (Germany)

^f Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDIGO CARMINE; COLORING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CHROMOENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; COLORECTAL DISEASE; COMPUTED VIRTUAL CHROMOENDOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HAMARTOMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JUVENILE POLYP; LEIOMYOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; POLYP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY;

ADENOMA; AGED; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COLORING AGENTS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INDIGOTINDISULFONATE SODIUM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 58249089527     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: 14683288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2008.153601     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:1977-81.
2. Hasemann JH, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, et al. Failure of colonoscopy to detect colorectal cancer: evaluation of 47 cases in 20 hospitals. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45:451-5.
3. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112:24-8.
4. Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M, et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 2005; 129:34-41.
5. Benson S, Mott LA, Dain B, et al. The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Polyp Prevention Study Group. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:194-9.
6. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2533-41.
7. Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH, et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24:965-71.
8. Kudo S, Kashida H, Tamura T, et al. Colonoscopic diagnosis and management of nonpolypoid early colorectal cancer. World J Surg 2000; 24:1081-90.
9. Hurtstone DP, Fujii T, Lobo AJ. Early detection of colorectal cancer using highmagnification chromoscopic colonoscopy. Br J Surg 2002; 89:272-82.
10. Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A, et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 2000; 355:1211-4.
11. Tsuda S, Veress B, Toth E, et al. Rat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut 2002; 51:550-5.
12. Saitoh Y, Waxman I, West B, et al. Prevalence and distinctive biologic features of flat colorectal adenomas in a north American population. Gastroenterology 2001; 120:1657-65.
13. Le Rhun M, Coron E, Parlier D, et al. High resolution colonoscopy with chromoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for the detection of colonic neoplasia: a randomized study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4:349-54.
14. Hurtstone DP, Cross SS, Slater R, et al. Detecting diminutive colorectal lesions at colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial of pan-colonic versus targeted chromoscopy. Gut 2004; 53:376-80.
15. Stoffel EM, Stockwell DH, Normolle DP, et al. Chromoendoscopic colonoscopy detects more adenomas than conventional colonoscopy: a randomized trial of backto-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 2006; 130(Suppl. 2):A48.
16. Pohl J, Nguyen-Tat M, Pech O, et al. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of small colorectal lesions: a prospective comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103:562-9.
17. Sonwalkar S, Rotimi O, Rembacken BJ. Characterization of colonic polyps at conventional (nonmagnifying) colonoscopy after spraying with 0.2% indigo carmine dye. Endoscopy 2006; 38:1218-23.
18. Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T, et al. Colorectal tumors and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol 1994; 47:880-5.
19. Su MY, Hsu CM, Ho YP, et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:2711-6.
20. Hirata M, Tanaka S, Oka S, et al. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for diagnosis of colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65:988-95.
21. Chiu HM, Chang CY, Chen CC, et al. A prospective comparative study of narrow band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Gut 2007; 56:373-9.
22. Lapalus MG, Helbert T, Napoleon B, et al. Does chromoendoscopy with structure enhancement improve colonoscopic adenoma detection rate? Endoscopy 2006; 38:444-8.
23. Pohl J, May A, Rabenstein T, et al. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy |CVC|: a new tool for enhancing tissue surface structures. Endoscopy 2007; 39:80-3.
24. Gono K, Yamazaki K, Doguchi N, et al. Endoscopic observation of tissue by narrow band illumination. Opt Rev 2003; 10:1-5.
25. Machida H, Sano Y, Hamamoto Y, et al. Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: a pilot study. Endoscopy 2004; 38:1094-8.
26. Rex DK, Helbig CC. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 2007; 133:42-7.
27. Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS, et al. A prospective randomized study on narrowband imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does NBI induce a learning effect? Gut 2008; 57:59-64.
28. Dekker E, van den Broek FJC, Reitsma JB, et al. Narrow-band-imaging compared with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of dysplasia in patients with longstanding ulceratice colitis. Endoscopy 2007; 39:216-21.
29. Pohl J, May A. Rabenstein T, et al. Comparison of computed virtual chromoendoscopy and conventional chromoendoscopy with acetic acid for detection of neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopy 2007; 39:594-8.
30. EII C, Fischbach W, Bronisch HJ, et al. Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103:883-93.
31. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for statistical computing. 2007.
32. Lieberman DA, Prindiville S, Weiss DG, et al. Risk factors for advanced colonic neoplasia and hyperplastic polyps in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 2003; 290:2959-67.
33. Sieg A, for the BNG-study group. Screening colonoscopy among persons 50 to 60 years of age with and without familial risk of colorectal cancer-a prospective multicenter trial. Z Gastroenterol 2003; 41:1077-82.
34. Kara MA, Peters FP, Rosmolen WD, et al. High-resolution endoscopy plus chromoendoscopy or narrow-band imaging in Barrett's esophagus: a prospective randomized crossover study. Endoscopy 2005; 37:929-36.
35. East JE, Suzuki N, Stavrinidis M, et al. Narrow band imaging for colonoscopic surveillance in hereditary non-pofyposis colorectal cancer. Gut 2008;57:65-70.
36. East JE, Saunders BP, Jass JR. Sporadic and syndromic hyperplastic polyps and serrated adenomas of the colon: classification, molecular genetics, natural history, and clinical management. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2008; 37:25-46.
37. Apel D, Jakobs R. Schilling D, et al. Accuracy of high-resolution chromoendoscopy in prediction of histologic findings in diminutive lesions of the rectosigmoid. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63:824-8.
38. Eisen GM, Kim CY, Fleischer DE, et al. High-resolution chromoendoscopy for classifying colonic polyps: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002: 55:687-94.