Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance: A systematic review

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 53, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 856-866

  Koopmans, Linda ^a,b   Bernaards, Claire M ^a,b   Hildebrandt, Vincent H ^a,b   Schaufeli, Wilmar B ^c   De Vet Henrica, C W ^a   Van Der Beek, Allard J ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DATA BASE; EMBASE; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; MEDLINE; OCCUPATION; PSYCINFO; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 80051795174     PISSN: 10762752     EISSN: 15365948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Waldman DA. The contributions of total quality management to a theory of work performance. Acad Manag Rev. 1994;19:510-536.
2. Evans CJ. Health and work productivity assessment: state of the art or state of flux? J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46:S3-S11. (Pubitemid 38747689)
3. Lerner D, Mosher Henke R. What does research tell us about depression, job performance, and work productivity? J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50:401-410. (Pubitemid 351521615)
4. Campbell JP. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In: Dunnette MD, Hough LM, eds. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1990:687-732.
5. Beaton D, Bombardier C, Escorpizo R, et al. Measuring worker productivity: frameworks and measures. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:2100-2109.
6. Schultz AB, Chen CY, Edington DW. The cost and impact of health conditions on presenteeism to employers. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27:365-378.
7. Halbeslebe JRB, Wheeler AR, Buckley MR. Clarifying the relationship between organizational commitment and job performance: extending the conservation of resources model. In: Kiefer KH, ed. Applied Psychology Research Trends. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers; 2008:35-58.
8. Judge TA, Bono JE, Thoreson CJ, Patton GK. The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: a qualitative and quantitative review. Psychol Bull. 2001;127:376-407.
9. Barrick MR, Mount MK, Judge TA. Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: what do we know and where do we go next? Int J Select Assess. 2001;9:9-30. (Pubitemid 33324895)
10. Tubre T, Arthur WJ, Bennett WJ. General models of job performance: theory and practice. In: Bennett W Jr, Lance CE, Woehr DJ, eds. Performance Measurement: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2006:175-203.
11. Viswesvaran C, Ones DS. Perspectives on models of job performance. Int J Select Assessm. 2000;8:216-226. (Pubitemid 33203817)
12. Kemppila S, Lonnqvist A. Subjective productivity measurement. J Am Acad Business. 2003;2:531-537.
13. Griffin MA, Neal A, Parker SK. A new model of work role performance: positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Acad Manag J. 2007;50:327-347.
14. Viswesvaran C. Assessment of individual job performance: a review of the past century and a look ahead. In: Anderson N, Ones DS, Sinangil HK, Viswesvaran C, eds. Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology. Vol 1: Personnel Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd; 2002:110-126.
15. Fay D, Sonnentag S. Alook back tomove ahead: newdirections for research on proactive performance and other discretionary work behaviours. Appl Psychol An Int Rev. 2010;59:1-20.
16. Fayers PM, Hand DJ. Causal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: an example from quality of life. J Royal Statist Soc. 2002;165:233-261.
17. Murphy KR. Dimensions of job performance. In: Dillon RF, Pellegrino JW, eds. Testing: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives. New York: Praeger; 1989:218-247.
18. Rotundo M, Sackett PR. The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of performance: a policycapturing approach. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87:66-80.
19. Murphy KR. Job performance and productivity. In: Murphy KR, Saal FE, eds. Psychology in Organizations: Integrating Science and Practice. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc; 1990:157-176.
20. Levine PJ. Substandard job performance: development of a model and the examination of poor organizational performers. Dissertation Abstr Int Sect B Sci Eng. 2007;67:5454.
21. Viswesvaran C. Modeling Job Performance: Is There a General Factor? [PhD dissertation]. Iowa City: The University of Iowa; 1993.
22. Wisecarver MM, Carpenter TD, Kilcullen RN. Capturing interpersonal performance in a latent performance model. Milit Psychol. 2007;19:83-101.
23. Lance CE, Teachout MS, Donnelly TM. Specification of the criterion construct space: an application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. J Appl Psychol. 1992;77:437-452.
24. Michel RP. A model of entry-level job performance. Dissertation Abstr Int Sect B Sci Eng. 2000;61(6-B):3313.
25. Sinclair RR, Tucker JS. Stress-CARE: an integrated model of individual differences in soldier performance under stress. In: Britt TW, Castro CA, Adler AB, eds. Military Life: The Psychology of Serving in Peace and Combat (Vol. 1): Military Performance. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International; 2006:202-231.
26. Campbell JP. Alternative models of job performance and their implications for selection and classification. In: Rumsey MG, Walker CB, Harris JH, eds. Personnel Selection and Classification. Hillsdale, NJ, and England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc; 1994:33-51.
27. Conway JM. Additional construct validity evidence for the task/contextual performance distinction. Hum Perform. 1996;9:309-329. (Pubitemid 126487741)
28. Borman WC, Hanson MA, Hedge JW. Personnel selection. Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:299-337. (Pubitemid 127485179)
29. Motowidlo SJ, Borman WC, Schmit MJ. A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Hum Perform. 1997;10:71-83. (Pubitemid 127530398)
30. Arvey RD, Murphy KR. Performance evaluation in work settings. Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49:141-168. (Pubitemid 128491771)
31. Van Dyne L, Jehn KA, Cummings A. Differential effects of strain on two forms of work performance: individual employee sales and creativity. JOrgan Behav. 2002;23:57.
32. Borman WC, Hedge JW, Ferstl KL, Kaufman JD, Farmer WL, Bearden RM. Current directions and issues in personnel selection and classification. In: Martocchio JJ, Ferris GR, eds. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Oxford, England: Elsevier Science Ltd; 2003:297-355.
33. Surface EA. An integration of the training evaluation and job performance modeling literatures: Confirming BEKNOWDO with United States army special forces training data. Dissertation Abstr Int Sect B Sci Eng. 2004;65:471.
34. Hoffman BJ, Blair CA, Meriac JP, Woehr DJ. Expanding the criterion domain? A quantitative review of the OCB literature. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92:555-566.
35. Borman WC, Motowidlo SJ. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: Schmitt N, Borman WC, eds. Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 1993:71-98.
36. Maxham JGI, Netemeyer RG, Lichtenstein DR. The retail value chain: linking employee perceptions to employee performance, customer evaluations, and store performance. Market Sci. 2008;27:147-167.
37. Van Scotter JR, Motowidlo SJ. Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. J Appl Psychol. 1996;81:525.
38. Borman WC, Penner LA, Allen TD, Motowidlo SJ. Personality predictors of citizenship performance. Int J Select Assess. 2001;9:52-69.
39. Viswesvaran C, Schmidt FL, Ones DS. Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90:108-131. (Pubitemid 40176550)
40. Ellington JK. Systematic sources of variance in supervisory job performance ratings: a multilevel analysis of between-rater and between-context variance. Dissertation Abstr Int Sect B Sci Eng. 2007;67:7413.
41. Greenslade JH, Jimmieson NL. Distinguishing between task and contextual performance for nurses: development of a job performance scale. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58(6):602-611.
42. Wang H, Law K, Chen Z. Leader-member exchange, employee performance, and work outcomes: an empirical study in the Chinese context. Int J Hum Res Manag. 2008;19:1809.
43. Hunt ST. Generic work behavior: an investigation into the dimensions of entry-level, hourly job performance. Pers Psychol. 1996;49:51-83. (Pubitemid 126173295)
44. Allworth E, Hesketh B. Construct-oriented biodata: capturing change-related and contextually relevant future performance. Int J Select Assess. 1999;7:97-111.
45. Pulakos ED, Arad S, Donovan MA, Plamondon KE. Adaptability in the workplace: development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85:612-624.
46. Pulakos ED, Schmitt N, Dorsey DW, Arad S, Hedge JW, Borman WC. Predicting adaptive performance: further tests of a model of adaptability. Hum Perform. 2002;15:299-324.
47. Renn RW, Fedor DB. Development and field test of a feedback seeking, selfefficacy, and goal setting model of work performance. J Manag. 2001;27:563.
48. Colquitt JA, Scott BA, LePine JA. Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92:909-927.
49. Mount MK, Oh IS, Burns M. Incremental validity of perceptual speed and accuracy over general mental ability. Pers Psychol. 2008;61:113-139.
50. Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Verbeke W. Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Hum Resour Manag. 2004;43:83-104. (Pubitemid 38706616)
51. Burton WN, Pransky G, Conti DJ, Chen CY, Edington DW. The association of medical conditions and presenteeism. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46(suppl):S38- S45. (Pubitemid 38747692)
52. Allen H. Using routinely collected data to augment the management of health and productivity loss. J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50:615-632.
53. Escorpizo R. Understanding work productivity and its application to work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Indust Ergon. 2008;38:291-297.
54. Fluegge ER. Who put the fun in functional? Fun at work and its effects on job performance. Dissertation Abstr Int Sect A Hum Soc Sci. 2009;69:2781.
55. Arvey RD, Mussio SJ. A test of expectancy theory in a field setting using female clerical employees. J Vocat Behav. 1973;3:421-432.
56. Jiambalvo J. Performance evaluation and directed job effort: model development and analysis in a CPA firm setting. J Account Res. 1979;17:436.
57. Campbell CH, Ford P, Rumsey MG, et al. Development of multiple job performance measures in a representative sample of jobs. Pers Psychol. 1990;43:277-300.
58. Campbell JP, Hanson MA, Oppler SH. Modeling performance in a population of jobs. In: Campbell JP, Knapp DJ, eds. Exploring the Limits in Personnel Selection and Classification. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2001:307-333.
59. Rollins T, Fruge M. Performance dimensions: competencies with a twist. Training. 1992;29:47-51.
60. Borman WC, Brush DH. More progress toward a taxonomy of managerial performance requirements. Hum Perform. 1993;6:1-21.
61. Engelbrecht AS, Fischer AH. The managerial performance implications of a developmental assessment center process. Hum Relat. 1995;48:387-404.
62. Tett RP, Guterman HA, Bleier A, Murphy PJ. Development and content validation of a "hyperdimensional" taxonomy of managerial competence. Hum Perform. 2000;13:205-251.
63. Hedge JW, Borman WC, Bruskiewicz KT, Bourne MJ. The development of an integrated performance category system for supervisory jobs in the US Navy. Milit Psychol. 2004;16:231-243. (Pubitemid 40031405)
64. Chan DC. Core competencies and performance management in Canadian public libraries. Library Manag. 2006;27:144.
65. Luo Z, Shi K, Li W, Miao D. Construct of job performance: evidence from Chinese military soldiers. Asian J Soc Psychol. 2008;11:222-231.
66. Mael FA, O'Shea PG, Smith MA, et al. Development of a model and measure of process-oriented quality of care for substance abuse treatment. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010;37:4-24.
67. Organ DW. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1988.
68. LePine JA, Erez A, Johnson DE. The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: a critical review and meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87:52-65.
69. Campbell JP, McHenry JJ, Wise LL. Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. Pers Psychol. 1990;43:313-333.
70. Conway JM. Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. J Appl Psychol. 1999;84:3-13.
71. Sackett PR. The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. Int J Select Assess. 2002;10:5-11.
72. Dalal RS. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90:1241-1255. (Pubitemid 43011579)
73. Spector PE, Fox S. Theorizing about the deviant citizen: an attributional explanation of the interplay of organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behavior. Hum Res Manag Rev. 2010;20:132-143.
74. Pulakos ED, Dorsey DW, White SS. Adaptability in the workplace: selecting an adaptive workforce. Adv Hum Perform Cogn Eng Res. 2006;6:41-71. (Pubitemid 43580835)