A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance

Human Performance

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 71-83

  Motowidlo, Stephan J ^a   Borman, Walter C ^b   Schmit, Mark J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^c Payless ShoeSource   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031515433     PISSN: 08959285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327043hup1002_1     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmit & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Campbell, J. P. (1983). Some possible implications of "modeling" for the conceptualization of measurement. In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J. Cleveland (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory (pp. 277-298). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.; pp. 687-732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
4. Campbell, J. P., Gasser, M. B., & Oswald, F. L. (1996). The substantive nature of job performance variability. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 258-299). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmit & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
7. Hunter, J. E. (1983). A causal analysis of cognitive ability, job knowledge, job performance, and supervisor ratings. In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J. Cleveland (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory (pp. 257-266). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality (pp. 51-87). New York: Guilford.
9. Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640-647.
10. Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475-480.
11. Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 28-38.
12. Newtson, D., Engquist, G., & Bois, J. (1977). The objective basis of behavior units. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 847-862.
13. Schmit, M. C., Motowidlo, S. J., DeGroot, T., Cross, T., & Kiker, D. S. (1996, April). Explaining the relationship between personality and job performance. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
14. Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 525-531.