General models of job performance: Theory and practice

Performance Measurement: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges

Volumn 9781315820996, Issue , 2014, Pages 175-204

  Tubré, Travis ^a   Arthur,, Winfred ^b   Bennett, Winston ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLS   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925822662     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315820996     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Arthur, W., Jr., Tubré, T. C., & Bennett, W., Jr. (1998, August). The development of a general measure of performance: Results of an initial psychometric evaluation. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Academy of Management, San Diego, CA.
2. Arvey, R. D., & Murphy, K. R. (1998). Performance evaluation in work settings. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 141–168.
3. Atwater, L. E., Ostroff, C., Yammarino, F. J., & Fleenor, J. W. (1998). Self–other agreement: Does it really matter? Personnel Psychology, 51, 577–598.
4. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big-Five personality dimensions in job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.
5. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
6. Bernardin, H. J., & Beatty, R. W. (1984). Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston: Kent.
7. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations(pp. 71–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection. Human Performance, 10, 99–109.
9. Campbell, J. P. (1990a). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 687–732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
10. Campbell, J. P. (1990b). The role of theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd. ed., Vol. 1, pp. 39–73). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
11. Campbell, J. P., Gasser, M. B., & Oswald, F. L. (1996). The substantive nature of job performance variability. In Kevin R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations(pp. 258–299). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations(pp. 35–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Campbell, J. P., McHenry, J. J., & Wise, L. L. (1990). Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. Personnel Psychology, 43, 313–333.
14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Conley, P. R., & Sackett, P. R. (1987). Effects of using high- versus low-performing job incumbents as sources of job-analysis information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 434–437.
16. Conway, J. M. (1999). Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 3–13.
17. Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1997). Psychometric properties of multisource performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. Human Performance, 10, 331–360.
18. Cranny, C. J., & Doherty, M. E. (1988). Importance ratings in job analysis: Note on the misinterpretation of factor analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 320–322.
19. Douglas, E. F., McDaniel, M. A., & Snell, A. (1996). The validity of non-cognitive measures decays when applicants fake. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, OH.
20. Findley, H. M., Giles, W. F., & Mossholder, K. W. (2000). Performance appraisal process and system facets: Relationships with contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 634–640.
21. Guion, R. M. (1991). Personnel assessment, selection, and placement. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 327–397). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
22. Harris, M. M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self–supervisor, self–peer, and peer–subordinate ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41, 43–62.
23. Harvey, R. J. (1991). Job analysis. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 71–163). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
24. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
25. James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26. Johnson, J. W. (2000). Factor analysis of importance ratings in job analysis: Note on the misinterpretation of Cranny and Doherty (1988). Organizational Research Methods, 3, 267–284.
27. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1986). LISREL 6: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least square methods. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
28. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software.
29. Lance, C. E., Teachout, M. S., & Donnelly, T. M. (1992). Specification of the criterion construct space: An application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 437–452.
30. Lance, C. E., & Woehr, D. J. (1989). The validity of performance judgments: Normative accuracy versus ecological perspectives. In D. F. Ray (Ed.), Proceedings of the Southern Management Association(pp. 115–117). Mississippi State University, MS: Southern Management Association.
31. McCloy, R. A., Campbell, J. P., & Cudeck, R. (1994). A confirmatory test of a model of job performance determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 493–505.
32. Mersman, J. L., & Donaldson, S. I. (2000). Factors affecting the convergence of self–peer ratings on contextual and task performance. Human Performance, 13, 299–322.
33. Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (1997). Social and cognitive sources of potential inaccuracy in job analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 627–655.
34. Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475–480.
35. Mott, P. E. (1972). The characteristics of effective organizations. New York: Harper & Row. Ones, D., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Meta-analysis of integrity test validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679–703.
36. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1992). Development of a causal model of processes determining job performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 89–92.
37. Schmitt, N., & Cohen, S. A. (1989). Internal analyses of task ratings by job incumbents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 96–104.
38. Scullen, S. E., Mount, M. K., & Goff, M. (2000). Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 956–970.
39. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.
40. Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.
41. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.
42. Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 525–531.
43. Van Scotter, J. R., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 526–535.
44. Viswesvaran, C. (1993). Modeling job performance: Is there a general factor? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
45. Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F. L., & Ones, D. S. (2005). Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 108–131.
46. Wexley, K. N., & Silverman, S. B. (1978). An examination of differences between managerial effectiveness and response patterns on a structured job analysis questionnaire. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 646–649.
47. Wright, P. M., Anderson, C., Tolzman, K., & Helton, T. (1990). An examination of the relationship between employee performance and job analysis ratings. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 50, 299–303.
48. Wright, P. M., Kacmar, K. M., McMahan, G. C., & Deleeuw, K. (1995). P=f(M × A): Cognitive ability as a moderator of the relationship between personality and job performance. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1129–1139.
49. Yammarino, F. J., & Waldman, D. A. (1993). Performance in relation to job skill importance: A consideration of rater source. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 242–249.