Becoming More Occupation-Centred When Working With Children

Occupation-Centred Practice with Children: A Practical Guide for Occupational Therapists

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 21-44

  Rodger, Sylvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

'top down' and 'bottom up' approach differences assessment and intervention; 'top down' coined by Trombly (1993), 'top down assessment' into role competence and meaning; Becoming more occupation centred when working with children; Canadian Process Practice Framework (CPPF); Individualisation of intervention; Occupation based practice enablement of occupation, defining element of occupational therapy; Occupation centred practice for working with children and families; Occupation centred practice and occupation centred practice process charting course of therapists' engagement with children; Occupational performance and participation in occupational therapy process; Theoretical underpinnings of practice, children in terms of occupational therapy theories

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960554353     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444319699.ch2     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. AOTA Commission on Practice. (2008). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process. Second edition. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(6), 625-683.
2. Ayres, J. (1972). Sensory integration and the child. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
3. Barthel, K. A. (2009). A frame of reference for neurodevelopmental treatment. In P. Kramer, & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (3rd ed., pp. 187-233). Philadelphia, PA: Walters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
4. Baum, C., & Law, M. (1997). Occupational therapy practice: Focusing on occupational performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 277-288.
5. Berry, J., & Ryan, S. (2002). Frames of reference: Their use in paediatric occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(9), 420-426.
6. Blanche, E. I., & Blanche Kiefer, D. (2007). Sensory integration and neurodevelopmental treatment as frames of reference in the context of occupational science. In S. Dunbar (Ed.), Occupational therapy models for intervention with children and families (pp. 11-26). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc.
7. Brown, G. T., Rodger, S., Brown, A., & Roever, C. (2007). A profi le of Canadian paediatric occupational therapy practice. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 21(4), 39-69.
8. Chapparo, C., & Ranka, J. (1997a). Towards a model of occupational performance: Model development. In C. Chapparo, & J. Ranka (Eds.), Occupational Performance Model (Australia): Monograph 1 (pp. 24-45). Sydney: Total Print Control (retrieved 10 March 2009 from http://www.occupationalperformance.com index.php).
9. Chapparo, C., & Ranka, J. (1997b). The perceive, recall, plan and perform system (PRPP). Sydney: Total Print Control (retrieved 10 March 2009 from http://www.occupationalperformance.comindex.php, originally published in Chapparro, C., & Ranka, J. (1997). Occupational Performance Model (Australia): Monograph 1 (pp. 199-204)).
10. Christiansen, C., Baum, C., & Bass-Haugen, J. (Eds.). (2005). Occupational therapy: Performance, participation and well-being (3rd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc.
11. Colangelo, C. A., & Shea, M. (2009). A biomechanical frame of reference for positioning children for functioning. In P. Kramer, & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (3rd ed., pp. 489-567). Philadelphia, PA: Walters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
12. Copley, J., Turpin, M., & Bennett, S. (in press). Decision making in occupational therapy practice with children. In S. Rodger (Ed.), Occupation centred practice for children: A practical guide for occupational therapists. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
13. Coster, W. (1998). Occupation-centred assessment of children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 227-344.
14. Davis, J., Craik, J., & Polatajko, H. (2007). Using the Canadian Process Practice Framework: Amplifying the process. In E. Townsend & H. Polatajko (Eds.), Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being and justice through occupation (pp. 247-272). Ottawa: CAOT Publications.
15. Dunbar, S. B. (2007). Theory, frame of reference and model: A differentiation for practice considerations. In S. Dunbar (Ed.), Occupational therapy models for intervention with children and families (pp. 1-10). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc.
16. Dunn, W. (2007). Ecology of human performance model. In S. Dunbar (Ed.), Occupational therapy models for intervention with children and families (pp. 127-156). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc.
17. Fearing, V. G., & Clark, J. (2000). Individuals in context: A practical guide to clientcentred practice. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc.
18. Fearing, V. G., Law, M., & Clark, J. (1997). An occupational performance process model: Fostering client and therapist alliances. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 7-15.
19. Fisher, A. G. (1997). Assessment of motor and process skills (2nd ed.). Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press.
20. Fisher, A. G. (1998). Uniting practice and theory in an occupational framework. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 509-521.
21. Fisher, A. G., & Short-DeGraff, M. (1993). Nationally speaking - Improving functional assessment in occupational therapy: Recommendations and philosophy for change. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 199-200.
22. Graham, F., Rodger, S., & Ziviani, J. (2009). Coaching parents to enable children's participation: An approach to working with parents and their children. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 56(1), 16-23.
23. Greber, C., Ziviani, J., & Rodger, S. (2007). The four quadrant model of facilitated learning (part 1): Using teaching-learning approaches in occupational therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54, S31-S39.
24. Hinojosa, J., & Kramer, P. (2009). Frames of reference for the real world. In P. Kramer, & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (3rd ed., pp. 571-581). Philadelphia, PA: Walters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
25. Iwama, M. (2006). The Kawa Model. Toronto, Ontario: Churchill Livingston, Elsevier.
26. Kaplan, M. T., & Bedell, G. (1999). Motor skill acquisition frame of reference. In P. Kramer, & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (2nd ed., pp. 410-430). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
27. Kielhofner, G. (2007). The model of human occupation: Theory and application (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
28. Kimball, J. G. (1999a). Sensory integration frame of reference: Theoretical base, function/dysfunction continua, and guide to evaluation. In P. Kramer, & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (2nd ed., pp. 119-168). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
29. Kimball, J. G. (1999b). Sensory integration frame of reference: Postulates regarding change and application to practice In P. Kramer, & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (2nd ed., pp. 129-204). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
30. King, G. A., Rosenbaum, P. L., & King, S. M. (1997). Evaluating family-centred service using a measure of parents' perceptions. Child: Care, Health and Development, 23(1), 47-62.
31. Kiresuk, T. J., Smith, A., & Cardillo, J. E. (1994). Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Kramer, J. M., & Bowyer, P. (2007). Application of the model of human occupation to children and family interventions. In S. Dunbar (Ed.), Occupational therapy models for intervention with children and families (pp. 51-90). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc.
33. Kramer, P., & Hinojosa, J. (1999). Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
34. Kramer, P., & Hinojosa, J. (2009). Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Walters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
35. Law, M. (1998). Client-centred occupational therapy. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc.
36. Law, M., Baptiste, S., Carswell, A., McColl, M., Polatajko, H., & Pollock, N. (1998). Canadian Occupational Performance Measure manual (3rd ed.). Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists.
37. Law, M., Baum, C. M., & Baptiste, S. (2002). Occupation-based practice: Fostering performance and participation. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc.
38. Law, M., & Dunbar, S. B. (2007). Person-environment-occupation model. In S. Dunbar (Ed.), Occupational therapy models for intervention with children and families (pp. 27-50). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc.
39. Luebben, A. J., & Brasic Royeen, C. (2009). An acquisitional frame of reference. In P. Kramer, & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (3rd ed., pp. 461-488). Philadelphia, PA: Walters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
40. Marr, D. (1999). Bridging a top-down approach in pediatrics. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 114-115.
41. Mattingly, C., & Fleming, M.H. (1994). Clinical reasoning: Forms of inquiry in therapeutic practice. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
42. McLaughlin Gray, J. (1998). Putting occupation into practice: Occupation as ends, occupations as means. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 354-364.
43. Missiuna, C., Malloy-Miller, T., & Mandich, A. D. (1997). Cognitive or 'top down' approaches to intervention. Hamilton, Canada: CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research. Retrieved 10 March 2009 from http://www.canchild.ca/ default.aspx?tabid=118 (Keeping Current #97-1).
44. Molineux, M. (2004). Occupation in occupational therapy: A labour in vain? In M. Molineux (Ed.), Occupation for occupational therapists (pp. 17-31). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
45. Mosey, A. C. (1981). Occupational therapy: Confi guration of a profession. New York: Raven.
46. Nelson, A., Copley, J., Flanigan, K., & Underwood, K. (2009). Occupational therapists prefer combining multiple intervention approaches for children with learning diffi culties. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 56(1), 51-62.
47. Olson, L. J. (2009). A frame of reference to enhance social participation. In P. Kramer, & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (2nd ed., pp. 306-348). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
48. Parham, C., & Mailloux, Z. (1998). Sensory integration. In J. Case-Smith, A. Allen, & P. N. Pratt (Eds.), Occupational therapy for children (pp. 307-352). Toronto, Ontario: Mosby.
49. Polatajko, H. J., & Mandich, A. D. (2004). Enabling occupation in children: The cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP) approach. Ottawa, Ontario: CAOT Publications ACE.
50. Polatajko, H. J., Mandich, A. D., & Martini, R. (2000). Dynamic performance analysis: A framework for understanding occupational performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54(1), 65-72.
51. Polatajko, H., Rodger, S., Dhillon, A., & Hirji, F. (2004). Approaches to the management of children with motor problems. In D. Dewey & D. E. Tupper (Eds.), Developmental motor disorders: A neuropsychological perspective - The science and practice of neuropsychology series (pp. 461-486). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
52. Rodger, S., Brown, G. T., & Brown, A. (2005). Profi le of paediatric occupational therapy practice in Australia. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52(4), 311-325.
53. Rogers, J. C. (2004). Occupational diagnosis. In M. Molineux (Ed.), Occupation for occupational therapists (pp. 17-31). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
54. Rogers, J. C., & Holm, M. B. (1991). Occupational therapy diagnostic reasoning: A component of clinical reasoning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(11), 1045-1053.
55. Royeen, C. B., & Duncan, M. (1999). Acquisition frame of reference. In P. Kramer, & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (2nd ed., pp. 377-429). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
56. Schaaf, R. C., Schoen, S. A., Smith Roley, S., Lane, S. J., Koomar, J., & May-Benson, T. A. (2009). A frame of reference for sensory integration. In P. Kramer, & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (3rd ed., pp. 99-186). Philadelphia, PA: Walters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
57. Schell, B. R., & Cervero, R. M. (1993). Clinical reasoning of occupational therapy: An integrative review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 605-610.
58. Schoen, S. A., & Anderson, J. (1999). NeuroDevelopmental treatment frame of reference. In P. Kramer, & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (2nd ed., pp. 83-118). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
59. Schneck, C. M. (2009). A frame of reference for visual perception. In P. Kramer, & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (3rd ed., pp. 349-389). Philadelphia, PA: Walters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
60. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the refl ective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
61. Stanton, M. (1997). Cerebral palsy handbook: A practical guide for parents and carers. London, UK: Vermillion.
62. Sumsion, T. (1996). Implementation issues. In T. Sumsion (Ed.), Client-centred practice in occupational therapy: A guide to implementation (pp. 27-37). London, UK: Churchill Livingstone.
63. Todd, J. (1990). Conductive education: The continuing challenge observations drawn from a recent period of study at the Peto Institute, Budapest. Physiotherapy, 76, 13-16.
64. Todd, V. R (1999). Visual information analysis frame of reference for visual perception. In P. Kramer, & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (2nd ed., pp. 205-255). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
65. Townsend, E., & Polatajko, H. (Eds.). (2007). Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being and justice through occupation. Ottawa, Ontario: CAOT Publications.
66. Trombly, C. (1993). Anticipating the future: Assessment of occupational function. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(3), 253-257.
67. Turpin, M. (2004). Clinical reasoning and refl ective practice: Postgraduate practicums. Brisbane, Queensland: Division of Occupational Therapy, University of Queensland.
68. Weinstock-Zlotnick, G., & Hinojosa, J. (2004). Bottom-up or top-down evaluation: Is one better than the other? American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 594-599.
69. Weston, J., Kinley, E., Hughes, B., & Fishwick, S. (1998). Physical (motor and functional) diffi culties. In R. Appleton, & T. Baldwin (Eds.), Management of brain-injured children (pp. 71-105). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
70. World Health Organisation (WHO). (2001). International Classifi cation of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.