PERSON-ENVIRONMENT-OCCUPATION MODEL

Occupational Therapy Models for Intervention with Children and Families

Volumn , Issue , 2024, Pages 27-49

  Law, Mary ^a   Dunbar, Sandra Barker ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85200877119     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781003525349-3     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting Stress Index (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
2. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2002). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and pro-cess. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 609-639.
3. Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley-III) (3rd ed.). San Antonio, Tx: Harcourt Assessment Inc.
4. Berk, R. A., & DeGangi, G. A. (1987). DeGangi-Berk Test of Sensory Integration manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). The bioecological model from a life course perspective: Reflections of a participant observer. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, & K. Luscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 599-618). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Bundy, A. C. (1999). Test of Environmental Supportiveness. Ft. Collins, CO: Colorado State University.
9. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1997). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspec-tive. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: CAOT Publications ACE.
10. Colangelo, C. A. (1999). Biomechanical frame of reference. In P. Kramer & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference in pediatric occupational therapy (2nd ed., pp. 257-322). Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
11. Cook, D. G. (1991). The assessment process. In W. Dunn (Ed.), Pediatric occupational therapy: Facilitating effective service provision (pp. 58-60). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
12. Cooper, B., & Stewart, D. (1997). The effect of a transfer device in the homes of elderly women. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 15, 61-77.
13. Coster, W. (1998). Occupation-centered assessment of children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 337-344.
14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
15. Dunbar, S. B. (1999). A child’s occupational performance: Considerations of sensory processing and family context. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 231-235.
16. Dunbar, S. B., & Werner DeGrace, B. (2001). Occupational therapy models for today’s practice with children and families. OT Practice, 6(21), 15-18.
17. Dunn, W., Brown, C., & McGuigan, A. (1994). The ecology of human performance: A framework for considering the effect of context. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 595-607.
18. Hotz, M., Kniepmann, K., & Kohn, L. (1998). Occupational therapy in pediatric lead exposure prevention. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(1), 53-59.
19. Howle, J. (2002). Neuro-developmental treatment approach: Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice. Laguna Beach, CA: NeuroDevelopmental Treatment Association.
20. Kielhofner, G. (2002). A model of human occupation: Theory and application. Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
21. Knox, S. (1997). Development and current use of the Knox Preschool Play Scale. In L. D. Parham & L. S. Fazio (Eds.), Play in occupational therapy for children (pp. 35-51). St.Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book.
22. Larson, R. W., & Verma, S. (1999). How children and adolescents spend time across the world: Work, play, and developmental opportunities. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 701-736.
23. Law, M. (1991). The environment: A focus for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 171-179.
24. Law, M. (2002). Participation in the occupations of everyday life. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 640-649.
25. Law, M., Baptiste, S., Carswell, A., McColl, M., Polatajko, H., & Pollock, N. (2005). Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (4th ed.). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: CAOT Publications.
26. Law, M., Baum, C., & Dunn, W. (2005). Measuring occupational performance (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
27. Law, M., Cooper, B., Stewart, D., Letts, L., Rigby, P., & Strong, S. (1994). Person-environment relations. Work, 4, 228-238.
28. Law, M., Cooper, B., Strong, S., Stewart, D., Rigby, P., & Letts, L. (1996). The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9-23.
29. Law, M., Darrah, J., Rosenbaum, P., Pollock, N., King, G., Russell, D., Palisano, R., Harris, S., Walter, S., Armstrong, R., & Watt, J. (1998). Family-centred functional therapy for children with cerebral palsy: An emerging practice model. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 18, 83-102.
30. Lawton, M., & Nahemow, L. (1973). An ecological theory of adaptive behavior and ageing. In C. Eisdorfer & M. Lawton (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and ageing (pp. 657-667). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31. Letts, L., Law, M., Rigby, P., Cooper, B., Stewart, D., & Strong, S. (1994). Person-environment assessments in occu-pational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 608-618.
32. Lewin, K. (1935). Dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw Hill.
33. McGuire, B., Crowe, T., Law, M., & VanLeit, B. (2004). Mothers of children with disabilities: Occupational concerns and solutions. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 24, 54-63.
34. McColl, M., & Pollock, N. (2005). Measuring occupational performance using a client-centered perspective. In M. Law, C. Baum, & W. Dunn (Eds.), Measuring occupational performance: A guide to best practice (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
35. Missiuna, C., Pollock, N., & Law, M. (2004). Perceived Efficacy and Goal Setting system (PEGS). San Antonio, Tx: Psychological Corp.
36. Mosey, A. C. (1981). Occupational therapy: Configuration of a profession. New York: Raven Press.
37. Murray, H. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford.
38. Olson, L. J. (1999). Psychosocial frame of reference. In P. Kramer & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference in pedi-atric occupational therapy (2nd ed., pp. 323-376). Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
39. Pollock, N., Stewart, D., Law, M., Sahagian-Whalen, S., Harvey, S., & Toal, C. (1997). The meaning of play for young people with physical disabilities. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 25-31.
40. Schafer, D. S., & Moersch, M. S. (1981). Developmental programming for infants and young children (3rd ed., Rev.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
41. Stewart, D., Law, M., Rosenbaum, P., & Willms, D. (2001). A quantitative study of the transition to adulthood for youth with physical disabilities. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 21, 3-22.
42. Strong, S. (1998). Meaningful work in supportive environments. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 31-38.
43. Strong, S., Rigby, P., Stewart, D., Law, M., Letts, L., & Cooper, B. (1999). Application of the person-environment-occupation model: A practical tool. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, 122-133.
44. Todd, V. R. (1999). Visual information analysis: Frame of reference for visual perception. In P. Kramer & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference in pediatric occupational therapy (2nd ed., pp. 205-256). Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
45. Wilcock, A. A. (1998). Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 248-257.