Access to continuous Professional Development by teachers in England

Curriculum Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 453-471

  Opfer, V Darleen ^a   Pedder, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Access to learning; Organisational support for learning; Teacher professional development

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959900918     PISSN: 09585176     EISSN: 14693704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09585176.2010.529680     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Arthur, L., H. Marland, A. Pill, and T. Rea. 2006. Postgraduate professional development for teachers: Motivational and inhibiting factors affecting the completion of awards. Journal of In-service Education 32, no. 2: 201-19.
2. Billett, S. 2006. Constituting the workplace curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies 38, no. 1: 31-48.
3. Birman, B.F., L. Desimone, A.C. Porter, and M.S. Garet. 2000. Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership 57, no. 8: 28-33.
4. Bolam, R., and D. Weindling. 2006. Synthesis of research and evaluation projects concerned with capacity-building through teachers' professional development. London: General Teaching Council for England.
5. Boyle, B., D. While, and T. Boyle. 2004. A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes professional development effective? The Curriculum Journal 15, no. 1: 45-68.
6. Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education (CUREE). 2008. Qualitative study of school-level strategies for teachers' CPD. London: General Teaching Council for England.
7. Cohen, D.K., and H. Hill. 1997. Teaching and learning mathematics in California. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, in Chicago, USA.
8. Cohen, D.K., and H.C. Hill. 1998. Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
9. Cordingley, P., M. Bell, D. Evans, and A. Firth (CPD Review Group). 2005a. The impact of collaborative CPD on classroom teaching and learning. Review: What do teacher impact data tell us about collaborative CPD? London: EPPI-Centre.
10. Cordingley, P., M. Bell, S. Thomason, and A. Firth (CPD Review Group). 2005b. The impact of collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) on classroom teaching and learning. Review: How do collaborative and sustained CPD and sustained but not collaborative CPD affect teaching and learning? London: EPPI-Centre.
11. Day, C., and Qing Gu. 2007. Variations in the conditions for teachers' professional learning and development: Sustaining commitment and effectiveness over a career. Oxford Review of Education 33, no. 4: 423-43.
12. Desimone, L., A.C. Porter, M.S. Garet, K.S. Yoon, and B.F. Birman. 2002. Effects of professional development on teachers' instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24, no. 2: 81-112.
13. Duncombe, R., K.M. Armour, and S.E. Fraser. 2004. Primary school teachers and the National PE-CPD programme for England. Presentation given to the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, September 16-18, at the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
14. Dymoke, S., and J.K. Harrison. 2006. Professional development and the beginning teacher: Issues of teacher autonomy and institutional conformity in the performance review process. Journal of Education for Teaching 32, no. 1: 71-92.
15. Fennema, E., T.P. Carpenter, M.L. Franke, L. Levi, V.R. Jacobs, and S.B. Empson. 1996. A longitudinal study of learning to use children's thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 27, no. 4: 403-34.
16. Galloway, D., F. Parkhurst, K. Boswell, C. Boswell, and K. Green. 1982. Sources of stress for classroom teachers. National Education 64: 166-9.
17. Garet, M.S., A.C. Porter, L. Desimone, B. Birman, and K.S. Yoon. 2001. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal 38, no. 4: 915-45.
18. Greeno, J.G., A.M. Collins, and L. Resnick. 1996. Cognition and learning. In Handbook of educational psychology, ed. D.C. Berliner and R.C. Calfee, 15-46. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
19. Hakkarainen, K., T. Palonen, S. Paavola, and E. Lehtinen. 2004. Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
20. Harrison, J., T. Lawson, and A. Wortley. 2005. Facilitating the professional learning of new teachers through critical reflection on practice during mentoring meetings. European Journal of Teacher Education 28, no. 3: 267-92.
21. Heibert, J. 1999. Relationships between research and the NCTM standards. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 30, no. 1: 3-19.
22. Hobson, A.J., A. Malderez, L. Tracey, M. Homer, N. Mitchell, M. Biddulph, M.S. Giannakaki, et al. 2007. Newly qualified teachers' experiences of their first year of teaching. Findings from Phase III of the 'Becoming a Teacher' project. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
23. Hodkinson, A. 2006. Career entry development profiles and the statutory induction arrangements in England: A model of effective practice for the professional development of newly qualified teachers? Journal of In-service Education 32, no. 3: 287-300.
24. Hollingsworth, H. 1999. Teacher professional growth: A study of primary teachers involved in mathematics professional development. PhD thesis, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
25. ICM (Institute of Commercial Management). 2006. The induction and training and development experiences of newly qualified teachers and teachers in the second and third year of their careers. Confidential report, Training and Development Agency for Schools. London: ICM.
26. Kennedy, M. 1998. Form and substance in in-service teacher education. Madison, WI: National Institute of Science Education.
27. MacBeath, J., D. Pedder, and S. Swaffield. 2007. Schools learning how to learn. In Improving learning how to learn, ed. M. James, R. McCormick, P. Black, P. Carmichael, M.-J. Drummond, A. Fox, J. MacBeath, et al., 64-88. London: Routledge.
28. MacGilchrist, B., K. Myers, and J. Reed. 2004. The intelligent school. London: Sage.
29. Makopoulou, K., and K.M. Armour. 2006. Evaluating the National PE-CPD programme in England: Evidence from schools and teachers. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, September 6-9, at the University of Warwick, UK.
30. Marshall, B., and M.-J. Drummond. 2006. How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education 21, no. 2: 133-49.
31. McCormick, R., F. Banks, B. Morgan, D. Opfer, D. Pedder, A. Storey, and F. Wolfenden. 2008. Schools and Continuing Professional Development (CPD) in England-State of the Nation research project (T34718): Literature review report. London: Training and Development Agency for Schools.
32. McCormick, R., A. Fox, R. Proctor, and P. Carmichael. 2007. Learning through networking. In Improving learning how to learn, ed. M. James, R. McCormick, P. Black, P. Carmichael, M.-J. Drummond, A. Fox, J. MacBeath, et al., 89-113. London: Routledge.
33. McGregor, J., C. Robinson, and M. Fielding. 2006. Tracing the footprints of practice. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, September 6-9, at the University of Warwick, UK.
34. McNicholl, J., and M. Noone. 2007. Teaching and learning at A level within a modular context: A collaborative project with biology teachers. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, September 5-8, at the Institute of Education, University of London, UK.
35. Miller, D., and D. Glover. 2007. Into the unknown: The professional development induction experience of secondary mathematics teachers using interactive whiteboard technology. Learning, Media and Technology 32, no. 3: 319-31.
36. Mortimore, P., P. Sammons, L. Stoll, D. Lewis, and R. Ecob. 1988. School matters: The junior years. Wells: Open Books.
37. Ofsted. 2002. Continuing Professional Development for teachers in schools inspected September 2000 to April 2001. London: Ofsted.
38. Ofsted. 2006. The logical chain: Continuing Professional Development in effective schools. London: Ofsted.
39. Opfer, V.D., G.T. Henry, and A.J. Mashburn. 2008a. The district effect: Systemic responses to high stakes accountability. American Journal of Education 114, no. 2: 299-332.
40. Opfer, V.D., D. Pedder, and Z. Lavicza. 2008b. Schools and Continuing Professional Development (CPD) in England-State of the Nation research project (T34718): Survey report. London: Training and Development Agency for Schools.
41. Pedder, D. 2006. Organisational conditions that foster successful classroom promotion of learning how to learn. Research Papers in Education 21, no. 2: 171-200.
42. Pedder, D., M. James, and J. MacBeath. 2005. How teachers value and practise professional learning. Research Papers in Education 20, no. 3: 209-43.
43. Pedder, D., and V.D. Opfer. 2010. Planning and organisation of teachers' Continuous Professional Development in schools in England. The Curriculum Journal 21, no. 4: 433-52.
44. Pedder, D., V.D. Opfer, R. McCormick, and A. Storey. 2010. 'Schools and Continuing Professional Development in England-State of the Nation' research study: Policy context, aims and design. The Curriculum Journal 21, no. 4: 365-94.
45. Pollard, A. 1985. The social world of the primary school. London: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
46. Rutter, M., B. Maugham, P. Mortimore, and J. Ouston. 1979. Fifteen thousand hours. London: Open Books.
47. Shields, P.M., J.A. Marsh, and N.E. Adelman. 1998. Evaluation of NSF's Statewide Systemic Initiatives Program: The SSI's impact on classroom practice. Menlo Park, CA: SRI.
48. Storey, A., F. Banks, D. Cooper, P. Cunningham, D. Ebbutt, A. Fox, B. Morgan, D. Pedder, and F. Wolfenden. 2008. Schools and Continuing Professional Development (CPD) in England-State of the Nation research project (T34718): Qualitative research summary. London: Training and Development Agency for Schools.
49. Sykes, G. 1996. Reform of and as professional development. Phi Delta Kappan 77, no. 7: 465-89.
50. Taber, K.S. 2005. Developing teachers as learning doctors. Teacher Development 9, no. 2: 219-35.
51. Teacher Training Agency (TTA). 2005. The Teacher Training Agency's role in the future of Continuing Professional Development: Response to the Secretary of State. London: TTA.
52. Veugelers, W., and M.J. O'Hair, eds. 2005. Network learning for educational change. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
53. Warwick, I., K. Rivers, and P. Aggleton. 2004. Developing a programme of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) in citizenship. Research briefing. London: Department for Education and Skills.
54. Wilde, J. 2005. 'Doing the undoable'. Professional development in schools in Special Measures. NCSL work in progess. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
55. Wilson, S., and D. Ball. 1991. Changing visions and changing practices: Patchworks in learning to teach mathematics for understanding. Research Report 91-2. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
56. Woods, P., B. Jeffrey, and G. Troman. 1997. Restructuring schools, reconstructing teachers. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.