Nuclear architecture in stem cells

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Volumn 695, Issue , 2010, Pages 14-25

  Morris, Kelly J ^b   Chotalia, Mita ^b   Pombo, Ana ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE METHYLTRANSFERASE; HOX PROTEIN; LAMIN A; LAMIN B; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; POLYCOMB GROUP PROTEIN; PROMYELOCYTIC LEUKEMIA PROTEIN; RNA POLYMERASE II; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR EZH2; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR MASH1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; CHROMATIN;

ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CELL COMPARTMENTALIZATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL MOTILITY; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CHROMOSOME 19; COILED BODY; CYTOARCHITECTURE; DNA MODIFICATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA TRANSCRIPTION; ECTODERM; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; ENDODERM; EPIGENETICS; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE SILENCING; HETEROCHROMATIN; HUMAN; LYMPHOBLASTOID CELL; MESODERM; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMYELOCYTE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; RNA PROCESSING; STEM CELL; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION; CHROMATIN; GENETICS; GENOME; METABOLISM;

CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOME; STEM CELLS;

EID: 79959745474     PISSN: 00652598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7037-4_2     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Keenen B, de la Serna IL. Chromatin remodeling in embryonic stem cells: regulating the balance between pluripotency and differentiation. J Cell Physiol 2009; 219(1): 1-7.
2. Meshorer E, Misteli T. Chromatin in pluripotent embryonic stem cells and differentiation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7(7): 540-546. (Pubitemid 44036459)
3. Branco MR, Pombo A. Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcription-dependent associations. PLoS Biol 2006; 4(5):el38.
4. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 2009; 326(5950):289-293.
5. Parada L, Misteli T. Chromosome positioning in the interphase nucleus. Trends Cell Biol 2002; 12(9):425-432. (Pubitemid 35239951)
6. Wiblin AE, Cui W, Clark AJ et al. Distinctive nuclear organisation of centromeres and regions involved in pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. J Cell Sci 2005; 118(Pt 17):3861-3868. (Pubitemid 41410270)
7. Bartova E, Galiova G, Krejci J et al. Epigenome and chromatin structure in human embryonic stem cells undergoing differentiation. Dev Dyn 2008; 237(12):3690-3702.
8. Solovei I, Kreysing M, Lanctot C et al. Nuclear architecture of rod photoreceptor cells adapts to vision in mammalian evolution. Cell 2009; 137(2):356-368.
9. Chambeyron S, Bickmore WA. Chromatin decondensation and nuclear reorganization of the HoxB locus upon induction of transcription. Genes Dev 2004; 18(10): 1119-1130. (Pubitemid 38669033)
10. Morey C, Kress C, Bickmore WA. Lack of by stander activation shows that localization exterior to chromosome territories is not sufficient to up-regulate gene expression. Genome Res 2009; 19(7): 1184-1194.
11. Senner CE, Brockdorff N. Xist gene regulation at the onset of X inactivation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009; 19(2):122-126.
12. Lee JT. Regulation of X-chromosome counting by Tsix and Xite sequences. Science 2005; 309(5735):768-771. (Pubitemid 41077322)
13. Xu N, Tsai CL, Lee JT. Transient homologous chromosome pairing marks the onset of X inactivation. Science 2006; 311(5764): 1149-1152.
14. Bacher CP, Guggiari M, Brors B et al. Transient colocalization of X-inactivation centres accompanies the initiation of X inactivation. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8(3):293-299. (Pubitemid 43336072)
15. Augui S, Filion GJ, Huart S et al. Sensing X chromosome pairs before X inactivation via a novel X-pairing region of the Xic. Science 2007; 318(5856): 1632-1636. (Pubitemid 350233663)
16. Xu N, Donohoe ME, Silva SS et al. Evidence that homologous X-chromosome pairing requires transcription and Ctcf protein. Nat Genet 2007; 39(11): 1390-1396. (Pubitemid 350035004)
17. Khalil A, Grant JL, Caddie LB et al. Chromosome territories have a highly nonspherical morphology and nonrandom positioning. Chromosome Res 2007; 15(7):899-916. (Pubitemid 350160095)
18. Scialdone A, Nicodemi M. Mechanics and dynamics of X-chromosome pairing at X inactivation. PLoS Comput Biol 2008; 4(12):el000244.
19. Tsai CL, Rowntree RK, Cohen DE et al. Higher order chromatin structure at the X-inactivation center via looping DNA. Dev Biol 2008; 319(2):416-425.
20. Eils R, Dietzel S, Bertin E et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of paintedhuman interphase chromosomes: active and inactive X chromosome territories have similar volumes but differ in shape and surface structure. J Cell Biol 1996; 135(6 Pt 1):1427-1440. (Pubitemid 26427642)
21. Chaumeil J, Le Baccon P, Wutz A et al. A novel role for Xist RNA in the formation of a repressive nuclear compartment into which genes are recruited when silenced. Genes Dev 2006; 20(16):2223-2237.
22. Butler JT, Hall LL, Smith KP et al. Changing nuclear landscape and unique PML structures during early epigenetic transitions of human embryonic stem cells. J Cell Biochem 2009; 107(4):609-621.
23. Gruenbaum Y, Margalit A, Goldman RD et al. The nuclear lamina comes of age. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6(1):21-31. (Pubitemid 40064896)
24. Francastel C, Schubeler D, Martin DI et al. Nuclear compartmentalization and gene activity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2000; 1(2): 137-143.
25. Akhtar A, Gasser SM. The nuclear envelope and transcriptional control. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8(7):507-517. (Pubitemid 46955211)
26. Finlan LE, Sproul D, Thomson I et al. Recruitment to the nuclear periphery can alter expression of genes in human cells. PLoS Genet 2008; 4(3):el000039.
27. Ragoczy T, Bender MA, Telling A et al. The locus control region is required for association of the murine beta-globin locus with engaged transcription factories during erythroid maturation. Genes Dev 2006; 20(11):1447-1457. (Pubitemid 43830652)
28. Williams RR, Azuara V, Perry P et al. Neural induction promotes large-scale chromatin reorganisation of theMashl locus. J Cell Sci 2006; 119(Pt 1):132-140. (Pubitemid 43169306)
29. Kosak ST, Skok JA, Medina KL et al. Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development. Science 2002; 296(5565):158-162. (Pubitemid 34280078)
30. Hewitt SL, High FA, Reiner SL et al. Nuclear repositioning marks the selective exclusion of lineage-inappropriate transcription factor loci during T helper cell differentiation. Eur J Immunol 2004; 34(12):3604-3613. (Pubitemid 40012178)
31. Constantinescu D, Gray HL, Sammak P J et al. Lamin A/C expression is a marker of mouse and human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells 2006; 24(1): 177-185.
32. Pajerowski JD, Dahl KN, Zhong FL et al. Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104(40):15619-15624. (Pubitemid 350035348)
33. Luo L, Gassman KL, Petell LM et al. The nuclear periphery of embryonic stem cells is a transcriptionally permissive and repressive compartment. J Cell Sci 2009; 122(Pt 20):3729-3737.
34. Kaiser TE, Intine RV, Dundr M. De novo formation of a subnuclear body. Science 2008; 322(5908):1713-1717.
35. Misteli T. Self-organization in the genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106(17):6885-6886.
36. Hall LL, Smith KP, Byron M et al. Molecular anatomy of a speckle. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2006; 288(7):664-675. (Pubitemid 44015467)
37. Xie SQ, Martin S, Guillot PV et al. Splicing speckles are not reservoirs of RNA polymerase II, but contain an inactive form, phosphorylated on serine2 residues of the C-terminal domain. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17(4): 1723-1733. (Pubitemid 44011589)
38. Lawrence JB, Clemson CM. Gene associations: true romance or chance meeting in a nuclear neighborhood? J Cell Biol 2008; 182(6): 1035-1038.
39. Morris GE. The Cajal body. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008; 1783(11 ):2108-2115.
40. Schwartz YB, Pirrotta V. Polycomb complexes and epigenetic states. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008; 20(3):266-273.
41. Brookes E, Pombo A. Modifications of RNA polymerase II are pivotal in regulating gene expression states. EMBO Rep 2009; 10(11): 1213-1219.
42. Bernstein E, Duncan EM, Masui O et al. Mouse polycomb proteins bind differentially to methylated histone H3 and RNA and are enriched in facultative heterochromatin. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26(7):2560-2569.
43. Ren X, Vincenz C, Kerppola TK. Changes in the distributions and dynamics of polycomb repressive complexes during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28(9):2884-2895. (Pubitemid 351556522)
44. Bancaud A, Huet S, Daigle N et al. Molecular crowding affects diffusion and binding of nuclear proteins in heterochromatin and reveals the fractal organization of chromatin. EMBO J 2009; 28(24):3785-3798.
45. Kimura H, Cook PR. Kinetics of core histones in living human cells: little exchange of H3 and H4 and some rapid exchange of H2B. J Cell Biol 2001; 153(7): 1341-1353. (Pubitemid 34286121)
46. Phair RD, Scaffidi P, Elbi C et al. Global nature of dynamic protein-chromatin interactions in vivo: three-dimensional genome scanning and dynamic interaction networks of chromatin proteins. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24(14):6393-6402. (Pubitemid 38891138)
47. Giglia-Mari G, Theil AF, Mari PO et al. Differentiation driven changes in the dynamic organization of Basal transcription initiation. PLoS Biol 2009; 7(10):el000220.
48. Cheutin T, McNairn AJ, Jenuwein T et al. Maintenance of stable heterochromatin domains by dynamic HP1 binding. Science 2003; 299(5607):721-725. (Pubitemid 36159490)
49. Festenstein R, Pagakis SN, Hiragami K et al. Modulation of heterochromatin protein 1 dynamics in primary Mammalian cells. Science 2003; 299(5607):719-721. (Pubitemid 36159489)
50. Misteli T, Gunjan A, Hock R et al. Dynamic binding of histone HI to chromatin in living cells. Nature 2000;408(6814):877-881. (Pubitemid 32016100)
51. Meshorer E, Yellajoshula D, George E et al. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev Cell 2006; 10(1): 105-116. (Pubitemid 43025681)
52. Aoto T, Saitoh N, Ichimura T et al. Nuclear and chromatin reorganization in the MHC-Oct3/4 locus at developmental phases of embryonic stem cell differentiation. Dev Biol 2006; 298(2):354-367. (Pubitemid 44468059)
53. Kobayakawa S, Miike K, Nakao M et al. Dynamic changes in the epigenomic state and nuclear organization of differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells. Genes Cells 2007; 12(4):447-460. (Pubitemid 46488581)
54. Cammas F, Oulad-Abdelghani M, Vonesch JL et al. Cell differentiation induces TIF 1 beta association with centromeric heterochromatin via an HP1 interaction. J Cell Sci 2002; 115(Pt 17):3439-3448. (Pubitemid 34994033)
55. Efroni S, Duttagupta R, Cheng J et al. Global transcription in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2008; 2(5):437-447. (Pubitemid 351598083)
56. Bibikova M, Chudin E, Wu B et al. Human embryonic stem cells have a unique epigenetic signature. Genome Res 2006; 16(9):1075-1083. (Pubitemid 44320394)
57. Gaspar-Maia A, Alajem A, Polesso F et al. Chdl regulates open chromatin and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 2009; 460(7257):863-868.
58. Faro-Trindade I, Cook PR. A conserved organization of transcription during embryonic stem cell differentiation and in cells with high C value. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17(7):2910-2920. (Pubitemid 43993496)
59. Donaldson AD. Shaping time: chromatin structure and the DNA replication programme. Trends Genet 2005;21(8):444-449. (Pubitemid 40981793)
60. Perry P, Sauer S, Billon N et al. A dynamic switch in the replication timing of key regulator genes in embryonic stem cells upon neural induction. Cell Cycle 2004; 3(12): 1645-1650. (Pubitemid 40521418)
61. Hiratani I, Ryba T, Itoh M et al. Global reorganization of replication domains during embryonic stem cell differentiation. PLoS Biol 2008; 6(10):e245.
62. Hiratani I, Leskovar A, Gilbert DM. Differentiation-induced replication-timing changes are restricted to AT-rich/long interspersed nuclear element (LINE)-rich isochores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101(48):16861-16866. (Pubitemid 39601329)
63. Goren A, Cedar H. Replicating by the clock. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003; 4(l):25-32. (Pubitemid 36077254)
64. Azuara V, Perry P, Sauer S et al. Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8(5):532-538.
65. Bernstein BE, Mikkelsen TS, Xie X et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2006; 125(2):315-326.
66. Stock JK, Giadrossi S, Casanova M et al. Ringl-mediated ubiquitination of H2A restrains poised RNA polymerase II at bivalent genes in mouse ES cells. Nat Cell Biol 2007; 9(12): 1428-1435. (Pubitemid 350201756)
67. Mikkelsen TS, Ku M, Jaffe DB et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 2007; 448(7153):553-560. (Pubitemid 47206934)
68. Cui K, Zang C, Roh TY et al. Chromatin signatures in multipotent human hematopoietic stem cells indicate the fate of bivalent genes during differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 2009; 4(l):80-93.
69. Mohn F, Weber M, Rebhan M et al. Lineage-specific polycomb targets and de novo DNA methylation define restriction and potential of neuronal progenitors. Mol Cell 2008; 30(6):755-766.
70. Rodriguez J, Munoz M, Vives L et al. Bivalent domains enforce transcriptional memory of DNA methylated genes in cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105(50): 19809-19814.
71. McGarvey KM, Van Neste L, Cope L et al. Defining a chromatin pattern that characterizes DNA-hypermethylated genes in colon cancer cells. Cancer Res 2008; 68(14):5753-5759.
72. Lira PS, Hardy K, Bunting KL et al. Defining the chromatin signature of inducible genes in T-cells. Genome Biol 2009; 10(10):R107.
73. Araki Y, Wang Z, Zang C et al. Genome-wide analysis of histone methylation reveals chromatin state-based regulation of gene transcription and function of memory CD8+ T-cells. Immunity 2009; 30(6):912-925.