Chromosome positioning in the interphase nucleus

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 425-432

  Parada, Luis A ^a   Misteli, Tom ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 2;

CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; DNA CONTENT; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; HETEROCHROMATIN; HUMAN; INTERPHASE; MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMOSOMES; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; INTERPHASE; MODELS, GENETIC; NEOPLASMS; TRANSLOCATION, GENETIC;

EID: 0036709614     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0962-8924(02)02351-6     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Francastel C., et al. Nuclear compartmentalization and gene activity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1:2000;137-143.
2. Strahl B.D., Allis C.D. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature. 403:2000;41-45.
3. Dundr M., Misteli T. Functional architecture in the cell nucleus. Biochem. J. 356:2001;297-310.
4. Comings D.E. Arrangement of chromatin in the nucleus. Hum. Genet. 53:1980;131-143.
5. Cremer T., Cremer C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2:2001;292-301.
6. Cremer T., et al. Rabl's model of the interphase chromosome arrangement tested in Chinese hamster cells by premature chromosome condensation and laser UV-microbeam experiments. Hum. Genet. 60:1982;46-56.
7. Schardin M., et al. Specific staining of human chromosomes in Chinese hamster × man hybrid cell lines demonstrates interphase chromosome territories. Hum. Genet. 71:1985;281-287.
8. Pinkel D., et al. Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83:1986;2934-2938.
9. Hochstrasser M., et al. Spatial organization of chromosomes in the salivary gland nuclei of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Cell Biol. 102:1986;112-123.
10. Visser A.E., Aten J.A. Chromosomes as well as chromosomal subdomains constitute distinct units in interphase nuclei. J. Cell Sci. 112:1999;3353-3360.
11. Visser A.E., et al. High resolution analysis of interphase chromosome domains. J. Cell Sci. 113:2000;2585-2593.
12. Croft J.A., et al. Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J. Cell Biol. 145:1999;1119-1131.
13. Mahy N.L., et al. Spatial organization of active and inactive genes and noncoding DNA within chromosome territories. J. Cell Biol. 157:2002;579-589.
14. Ferreira J., et al. Spatial organization of large-scale chromatin domains in the nucleus: a magnified view of single chromosome territories. J. Cell Biol. 139:1997;1597-1610.
15. Sadoni N., et al. Nuclear organization of mammalian genomes. Polar chromosome territories build up functionally distinct higher order compartments. J. Cell Biol. 146:1999;1211-1226.
16. Jackson D.A., Pombo A. Replicon clusters are stable units of chromosome structure: evidence that nuclear organization contributes to the efficient activation and propagation of S phase in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 140:1998;1285-1295.
17. Zink D., et al. Organization of early and late replicating DNA in human chromosome territories. Exp. Cell Res. 247:1999;176-188.
18. Sachs R.K., et al. A random-walk/giant-loop model for interphase chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92:1995;2710-2714.
19. Munkel C., et al. Compartmentalization of interphase chromosomes observed in simulation and experiment. J. Mol. Biol. 285:1999;1053-1065.
20. Misteli T. Protein dynamics: implications for nuclear architecture and gene expression. Science. 291:2001;843-847.
21. Belmont A.S., et al. Large-scale chromatin structure and function. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11:1999;307-311.
22. Verschure P.J., et al. Spatial relationship between transcription sites and chromosome territories. J. Cell Biol. 147:1999;13-24.
23. Abranches R., et al. Transcription sites are not correlated with chromosome territories in wheat nuclei. J. Cell Biol. 143:1998;5-12.
24. Kurz A., et al. Active and inactive genes localize preferentially in the periphery of chromosome territories. J. Cell Biol. 135:1996;1195-1205.
25. Volpi E.V., et al. Large-scale chromatin organization of the major histocompatibility complex and other regions of human chromosome 6 and its response to interferon in interphase nuclei. J. Cell Sci. 113:2000;1565-1576.
26. Williams R.R., et al. Subchromosomal positioning of the epidermal differentiation complex (EDC) in keratinocyte and lymphoblast interphase nuclei. Exp. Cell Res. 272:2002;163-175.
27. Rabl C. Über Zellteilung. Gegenbauer C., Morpholgisches Jahrbuch. 10:1885;214-258.
28. Jin Q.W., et al. Centromere clustering is a major determinant of yeast interphase nuclear organization. J. Cell Sci. 113:2000;1903-1912.
29. Zickler D., Kleckner N. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33:1999;603-754.
30. Wilkie G.S., et al. Transcribed genes are localized according to chromosomal position within polarized Drosophila embryonic nuclei. Curr. Biol. 9:1999;1263-1266.
31. Cremer M., et al. Non-random radial higher-order chromatin arrangements in nuclei of diploid human cells. Chromosome Res. 9:2001;541-567.
32. Boyle S., et al. The spatial organization of human chromosomes within the nuclei of normal and emerin-mutant cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10:2001;211-219.
33. Tanabe H., et al. Evolutionary conservation of chromosome territory arrangements in cell nuclei from higher primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;4424-4429.
34. Sun H.B., et al. Size-dependent positioning of human chromosomes in interphase nuclei. Biophys. J. 79:2000;184-190.
35. Nagele R., et al. Precise spatial positioning of chromosomes during prometaphase: evidence for chromosomal order. Science. 270:1995;1831-1835.
36. Allison D.C., Nestor A.L. Evidence for a relatively random array of human chromosomes on the mitotic ring. J. Cell Biol. 145:1999;1-14.
37. Nagele R.G., et al. Chromosomes exhibit preferential positioning in nuclei of quiescent human cells. J. Cell Sci. 112:1999;525-535.
38. Habermann F.A., et al. Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells. Chromosome Res. 9:2001;569-584.
39. Bridger J.M., et al. Re-modelling of nuclear architecture in quiescent and senescent human fibroblasts. Curr. Biol. 10:2000;149-152.
40. Tumbar T., Belmont A.S. Interphase movements of a DNA chromosome region modulated by VP16 transcriptional activator. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:2001;134-139.
41. Abney J.R., et al. Chromatin dynamics in interphase nuclei and its implications for nuclear structure. J. Cell Biol. 137:1997;1459-1468.
42. Zink D., et al. Structure and dynamics of human interphase chromosome territories in vivo. Hum. Genet. 102:1998;241-251.
43. Manders E., et al. Direct imaging of DNA in living cells reveals the dynamics of chromosome formation. J. Cell Biol. 144:1999;813-821.
44. Vazquez J., et al. Multiple regimes of constrained chromosome motion are regulated in the interphase Drosophila nucleus. Curr Biol. 11:2001;1227-1239.
45. Heun P., et al. Chromosome dynamics in the yeast interphase nucleus. Science. 294:2001;2181-2186.
46. Chubb J.R., et al. Chromatin motion is constrained by association with nuclear compartments in human cells. Curr. Biol. 12:2002;439-445.
47. Luderus M.E., et al. Binding of matrix attachment regions to lamin polymers involves single-stranded regions and the minor groove. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:1994;6297-6305.
48. Taniura H., et al. A chromatin binding site in the tail domain of nuclear lamins that interacts with core histones. J. Cell Biol. 131:1995;33-44.
49. Goldberg M., et al. The tail domain of lamin Dm0 binds histones H2A and H2B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;2852-2857.
50. Georgatos S.D. The inner nuclear membrane: simple, or very complex? Embo J. 20:2001;2989-2994.
51. Andrulis E.D., et al. Perinuclear localization of chromatin facilitates transcriptional silencing. Nature. 394:1998;592-595.
52. Galy V., et al. Nuclear pore complexes in the organization of silent telomeric chromatin. Nature. 403:2000;108-112.
53. Feuerbach F., et al. Nuclear architecture and spatial positioning help establish transcriptional states of telomeres in yeast. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:2002;214-221.
54. Laroche T., et al. Mutation of yeast Ku genes disrupts the subnuclear organization of telomeres. Curr. Biol. 8:1998;653-656.
55. Ishii K., et al. Chromatin boundaries in budding yeast: the nuclear pore connection. Cell. 109:2002;551-562.
56. Gasser S.M., Laemmli U.K. Cohabitation of scaffold binding regions with upstream/enhancer elements of three developmentally regulated genes of D. melanogaster. Cell. 46:1986;521-530.
57. Goldman R.D., et al. Nuclear lamins: building blocks of nuclear architecture. Genes Dev. 16:2002;533-547.
58. Eils R., et al. Quantitative imaging of pre-mRNA splicing factors in living cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 11:2000;413-418.
59. Lemon B., Tjian R. Orchestrated response: a symphony of transcription factors for gene control. Genes Dev. 14:2000;2551-2569.
60. Pombo A., et al. Regional and temporal specialization in the nucleus: a transcriptionally-active nuclear domain rich in PTE, Oct1 and PIKA antigens associates with specific chromosomes early in the cell cycle. EMBO J. 17:1998;1768-1778.
61. Denegri M., et al. Human chromosomes 9, 12 and 15 contain the nucleation sites of stress-induced nuclear bodies. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13:2002;2069-2079.
62. Jolly C., et al. In vivo binding of active heat shock transcription factor 1 to human chromosome 9 heterochromatin during stress. J. Cell Biol. 156:2002;775-781.
63. Frey M.R., et al. Association of snRNA genes with coiled bodies is mediated by nascent snRNA transcripts. Curr. Biol. 9:1999;126-135.
64. Schul W., et al. Nuclear domains enriched in RNA 3′-processing factors associate with coiled bodies and histone genes in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Mol. Biol. Cell. 10:1999;3815-3824.
65. Shiels C., et al. PML bodies associate specifically with the MHC gene cluster in interphase nuclei. J. Cell Sci. 114:2001;3705-3716.
66. Dernburg A.F., et al. Perturbation of nuclear architecture by long-distance chromosome interactions. Cell. 85:1996;745-759.
67. Brown K.E., et al. Association of transcriptionally silent genes with Ikaros complexes at centromeric heterochromatin. Cell. 91:1997;845-854.
68. Csink A.K., Henikoff S. Large-scale chromosomal movements during interphase progression in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 143:1998;13-22.
69. Francastel C., et al. A functional enhancer suppresses silencing of a transgene and prevents its localization close to centromeric heterochromatin. Cell. 99:1999;259-269.
70. Maillet L., et al. Evidence for silencing compartments within the yeast nucleus: a role for telomere proximity and Sir protein concentration in silencer-mediated repression. Genes Dev. 10:1996;1796-1811.
71. Lundgren M., et al. Transcription factor dosage affects changes in higher order chromatin structure associated with activation of a heterochromatic gene. Cell. 103:2000;733-743.
72. Cheng T.H., Gartenberg M.R. Yeast heterochromatin is a dynamic structure that requires silencers continuously. Genes Dev. 14:2000;452-463.
73. Sekinger E.A., Gross D.S. Silenced chromatin is permissive to activator binding and PIC recruitment. Cell. 105:2001;403-414.
74. Borden J., Manuelidis L. Movement of the X chromosome in epilepsy. Science. 242:1988;1687-1691.
75. Manuelidis L. Individual interphase chromosome domains revealed by in-situ hybridization. Hum. Genet. 71:1985;288-293.
76. Choh V., De Boni U. Spatial repositioning of centromeric domains during regrowth of axons in nuclei of murine dorsal root ganglion neurons in vitro. J. Neurobiol. 31:1996;325-332.
77. Martou G., De Boni U. Nuclear topology of murine, cerebellar Purkinje neurons: changes as a function of development. Exp. Cell Res. 256:2000;131-139.
78. Chaly N., Munro S.B. Centromeres reposition to the nuclear periphery during L6E9 myogenesis in vitro. Exp. Cell Res. 223:1996;274-278.
79. Brown K.E., et al. Dynamic repositioning of genes in the nucleus of lymphocytes preparing for cell division. Mol. Cell. 3:1999;207-217.
80. Mitelman F. Recurrent chromosome aberrations in cancer. Mutat. Res. 462:2000;247-253.
81. Elliott B., Jasin M. Double-strand breaks and translocations in cancer. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59:2002;373-385.
82. Sachs R.K., et al. Proximity effects in the production of chromosome aberrations by ionizing radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 71:1997;1-19.
83. Savage J.R., Papworth D.G. The relationship of radiation-induced dicentric yield to chromosome arm number. Mutat. Res. 19:1973;139-143.
84. Lukasova E., et al. Localisation and distance between ABL and BCR genes in interphase nuclei of bone marrow cells of control donors and patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Hum. Genet. 100:1997;525-535.
85. Neves H., et al. The nuclear topography of ABL, BCR, PML, and RARalpha genes: evidence for gene proximity in specific phases of the cell cycle and stages of hematopoietic differentiation. Blood. 93:1999;1197-1207.
86. Nikiforova M.N., et al. Proximity of chromosomal loci that participate in radiation-induced rearrangements in human cells. Science. 290:2000;138-141.