Is It Worth Revisiting Laparoscopic Three-Dimensional Visualization? A Validated Assessment

Urology

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 47-49

  Patel, Hitendra R H ^a,b   Ribal, Maria Jose ^a   Arya, Manit ^a   Nauth Misir, Rohan ^a   Joseph, Jean V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLADDER SURGERY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SIMULATION; SURGEON; SURGICAL TRAINING; SUTURING METHOD; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; URETHRA SURGERY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANIMALS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LAPAROSCOPY; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 34447550082     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abdelshehid C.S., Eichel L., Lee D., et al. Current trends in urologic laparoscopic surgery. J Endourol 19 (2005) 15-20
2. Badani K.K., Bhandari A., Tewari A., et al. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional suturing: is there a difference in a robotic surgery setting?. J Endourol 19 (2005) 1212-1215
3. von Pichler C., Radermacher K., Boeckmann W., et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video endoscopy: a clinical field study in laparoscopic application. Stud Health Technol Inform 29 (1996) 667-674
4. Becker H., Melzer A., Schurr M.O., et al. 3-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1 (1993) 40-46
5. Birkett D.H., Josephs L.G., and Este-McDonald J. A new 3-D laparoscope in gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Endosc 8 (1994) 1448-1451
6. Calvano C.J., Moran M.E., Tackett L.D., et al. New visualization techniques for in utero surgery: amnioscopy with a three-dimensional head-mounted display and a computer-controlled endoscope. J Endourol 12 (1998) 407-410
7. Chan A.C., Chung S.C., Yim A.P., et al. Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11 (1997) 438-440
8. Koster S., Volz J., and Melchert F. [Indications for 3 D laparoscopy in gynecology]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 56 (1996) 431-433
9. Levy M.L., Chen J.C., Moffitt K., et al. Stereoscopic head-mounted display incorporated into microsurgical procedures: technical note. Neurosurgery 43 (1998) 392-395
10. Pietrabissa A., Scarcello E., Carobbi A., et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 2 (1994) 315-317
11. Yoshida T., Inoue H., Hara E., et al. Newly developed 3D endoscopic system: preliminary experience. Endoscopy 35 (2003) 181-184
12. van Bergen P., Kunert W., Schurr M.O., et al. [Comparative study of endoscopic 2-D and 3-D imaging systems]. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 113 (1996) 634-637
13. Bhayani S.B., and Andriole G.L. Three-dimensional (3D) vision: does it improve laparoscopic skills?. An assessment of a 3D head-mounted visualization system. Rev Urol 7 (2005) 211-214
14. Mueller M.D., Camartin C., Dreher E., et al. Three-dimensional laparoscopy: gadget or progress?. A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13 (1999) 469-472
15. Taffinder N., Smith S.G., Huber J., et al. The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 13 (1999) 1087-1092
16. Sun C.C., Chiu A.W., Chen K.K., et al. Assessment of a three-dimensional operating system with skill tests in a pelvic trainer. Urol Int 64 (2000) 154-158
17. McDougall E.M., Soble J.J., Wolf Jr. J.S., et al. Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems. J Endourol 10 (1996) 371-374
18. Danis J. Theoretical basis for camera control in teleoperating. Surg Endosc 10 (1996) 804-808
19. Pietrzak P., Arya M., Joseph J.V., et al. Three-dimensional visualization in laparoscopic surgery. BJU Int 98 (2006) 253-256