Effects of magnification and zooming on depth perception in digital stereomammography: An observer performance study

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 48, Issue 22, 2003, Pages 3721-3734

  Chan, Heang Ping ^a   Goodsitt, Mitchell M ^a   Hadjiiski, Lubomir M ^a   Bailey, Janet E ^a   Klein, Katherine ^a   Darner, Katie L ^a   Sahiner, Berkman ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIFICATION (BIOCHEMISTRY); GLASS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; X RAYS;

MAMMOGRAMS; STEREOSCOPIC IMAGING;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

POLYCARBONATE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; GEOMETRY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MONITOR; NOISE; NYLON FIBER; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; STEREORADIOGRAPHY;

BREAST; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 0344466497     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/22/007     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aufrichtig R 1999 Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography Med. Phys. 26 1349-58
2. Beam C A, Layde P M and Sullivan D C 1996 Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists - findings from a national sample Arch. Intern. Med. 156 209-13
3. Bird R E, Wallace T W and Yankaskas B C 1992 Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography Radiology 184 613-7
4. Boone J M, Nelson T R, Lindfors K K and Seibert J A 2001 Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation Radiology 221 657-67
5. Chan H P, Goodsitt M M, Darner K L, Sullivan J M, Hadjiiski L M, Petrick N and Sahiner B 2001 Effects of stereoscopic imaging technique on depth discrimination Proc. IWDM 2000 - 5th Int. Workshop on Digital Mammography, Digital Mammography (Toronto, Canada) ed M J Yaffe (Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing) pp 13-8
6. Chan H P, Goodsitt M M, Hadjiiski L, Bailey J E, Klein K, Darner K L and Paramagul C 2002a Digital stereomammography: observer performance study of the effects of magnification and zooming on depth perception Proc. SPIE 4682 163-6
7. Chan H P, Goodsitt M M, Hadjiiski L M, Helvie M A, Bailey J, Klein K and Roubidoux M A 2002b Development of digital stereo imaging technique for mammography Era of Hope Meeting (U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command, Department of Defense, Breast Cancer Research Program, Orlando, Florida, September 25-28)
8. Chan H P, Goodsitt M M, Hadjiiski L, Roubidoux M A, Bailey J E, Helvie M A, Lydick J T and Sahiner B 2003 ROC study comparing radiologists' performances in evaluating breast lesions on stereoscopic and single-projection digital specimen mammograms Med. Phys. 30 1456 (abstract)
9. Chan H P, Goodsitt M M, Sullivan J M, Darner K L and Hadjiiski L M 2000 Depth perception in digital stereoscopic mammography Era of Hope Meeting (U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command, Department of Defense, Breast Cancer Research Program, Atlanta, Georgia, June 8-12)
10. Conant E F, Maidment A D, Albert M, Piccoli C W, Nussbaum S A and McCue P A 1996 Small field-of-view digital imaging of breast calcifications: method to improve diagnostic specificity Radiology 201(P) 369
11. Curry T S, Dowdey J E and Murry R C 1992 Christensen's Physics of Diagnostic Radiology 4th edn (Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger)
12. Doi K and Duda E E 1983 Detectability of depth information by use of magnification stereoscopic technique in cerebral angiography Radiology 146 91-5
13. Doi K and Imhof H 1977 Noise reduction by radiographic magnification Radiology 122 479-87
14. Doi K, Patronas N J, Duda E E, Geldner E and Dietz K 1981 X-ray imaging of blood vessels to the brain by use of magnification stereoscopic technique Adv. Neurol. 30 175-89
15. Doi K and Rossmann K 1974 The effect of radiographic magnification on blood vessel imaging with various screen-film systems Med. Phys. 1 257-61
16. Getty D J, Pickett R M and D'Orsi C J 2001 Stereoscopic digital mammography: improving detection and diagnosis of breast cancer Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 2001, Proc. 15th Int. Congress and Exhibition (Berlin) (International Congress Series 1230) ed H U Lemke, M W Vannier, K Inamura, A G Farman and K Doi (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp 506-11
17. Goodsitt M M, Chan H P, Darner K L and Hadjiiski L M 2002 The effects of stereo shift angle, geometric magnification and display zoom on depth measurements in digital stereomammography Med. Phys. 29 2725-34
18. Goodsitt M M, Chan H P and Hadjiiski L M 2000 Stereomammography: evaluation of depth perception using a virtual 3D cursor Med. Phys. 27 1305-10
19. Harvey J A, Fajardo L L and Innis C A 1993 Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinomas: retrospective vs blinded interpretation Am. J. Roentgenol. 161 1167-72
20. Higashida Y, Hirata Y, Saito R, Doudanuki S, Bussaka H and Takahashi M 1988 Depth determination on stereoscopic digital subtraction angiograms Radiology 168 560-2
21. Jackson V P, Hendrick R E, Feig S A and Kopans D B 1993 Imaging of the radiographically dense breast Radiology 188 297-301
22. Kelsey C A, Moseley R D, Mettler S A and Briscoe D E 1982 Cost-effectiveness of stereoscopic radiographs in detection of lung nodules Radiology 142 611-3
23. Loo L N, Doi K and Metz C E 1985 Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography: 4. Effect of unsharp masking on the detectability of simple patterns Med. Phys. 12 209-14
24. Maidment A D A, Albert M, Conant E F, Piccoli C W and McCue P A 1996 Prototype workstation for 3-D diagnosis of breast calcifications Radiology 201(P) 556
25. Maidment A D A, Bakic P and Alberg M 2003 Is stereomammography possible without increasing dose? Proc. IWDM 2002 - 6th Int. Workshop on Digital Mammography, Digital Mammography (Bremen, Germany) ed H Petitgen (Berlin: Springer) pp 510-5
26. Niklason L T et al 1997 Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging Radiology 205 399-406
27. Ragnarsson J I and Karrholm J 1992 Factors influencing postoperative movement in displaced femoral neck fractures: evaluation by conventional radiography and stereoradiography J. Orthop. Trauma 6 152-8
28. Raptopoulos V, Baum J K, Hochman M, Karellas A, Houlihan M J and D'Orsi C J 1996 High resolution CT mammography of surgical biopsy specimens J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 20 179-84
29. Seidman H, Gelb S K, Silverberg E, LaVerda N and Lubera J A 1987 Survival experience in the breast cancer detection demonstration project CA Cancer J. Clin. 37 258-90
30. Simons K 1981 Stereoacuity norms in young children Arch. Ophthalmol. 99 435-45
31. Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Glick S J, D'Orsi C J, Baker S P and Webber R L 2000 Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography Acad. Radiol. 7 1085-97
32. Trocme M C, Sather A H and An K N 1990 A biplanar cephalometric stereoradiography technique Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 98 168-75
33. Wallis M G, Walsh M T and Lee J R 1991 A review of false negative mammography in a symptomatic population Clin. Radiol. 44 13-5