Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 193, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 519-522

  Byrn, John C ^a   Schluender, Stefanie ^a   Divino, Celia M ^a   Conrad, John ^b   Gurland, Brooke ^b   Shlasko, Edward ^b   Szold, Amir ^c  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c TEL AVIV SOURASKY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

da Vinci; Laparoscopy; Robotics; Three dimensional vision; Two dimensional vision

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SURGEON; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; MOTOR SKILLS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 33947106495     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.042     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chan A.C., Chung S.C., Yim A.P., et al. Comparison of two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11 (1997) 438-440
2. Hanna G.B., Shimi S.M., and Cuschieri A. Randomized study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 351 (1998) 248-251
3. Jones D.B., Brewer J.D., and Soper N.J. The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6 (1996) 191-197
4. Yohannes P., Rotariu P., Pinto P., et al. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?. Urology 60 (2002) 39-45
5. Falk V., Diegler A., Walther T., et al. Total endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17 (2000) 38-45
6. Dion Y.M., and Gaillard F. Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 11 (1997) 995-1000
7. Falk V., Mintz D., Grunenfelder J., et al. Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance. Surg Endosc 15 (2001) 1282-1288
8. Coren S., and Ward L.M. Sensation and Perception (1989), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Orlando, FL
9. Birkett D.H. 3-D imaging in gastrointestinal laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 7 (1995) 556-557
10. Cruz A.A.V., Fuklusima S.S., Shor P., et al. Effect of differences in binocularity on perceived absolute distance. Braz J Med Biol Res 22 (1989) 1355-1359
11. Blake R., and Levinson E. Spatial properties of binocular neurons in the human visual system. Exp Brain Res 27 (1973) 221-232
12. Cagnello R., Arditi A., and Halpern D.L. Binocular enhancement of visual acuity. J Opt Soc Am 10 (1993) 1841-1848
13. Rabin J. Two eyes are better than one: binocular enhancement in the contrast domain. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 15 (1995) 45-48
14. Wenzl R., Lehner R., Vry U., et al. Three-dimensional video-endoscopy: clinical use in gynaecological laparoscopy. Lancet 344 (1994) 1621-1622
15. Rabin J. Two eyes are better than one: binocular enhancement in the contrast domain. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 15 (1995) 45-48
16. Servos P., Goodale M.A., and Jakobsen L.S. The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vision Res 32 (1992) 1513-1521
17. Van Pichler C., Rademacher J.K., Boeckmann W., et al. Stereoscopic visualization in endoscopic surgery: problems, benefits, and potentials. Perception 6 (1997) 198-217
18. Buess G.F., VanBergen P., Kunert W., et al. Comparative study of various 2D and 3D vision systems in minimally invasive surgery. Chirurg 67 (1996) 1041-1046
19. Bhoyrul S., Tendick F., Mori T., et al. An analysis of perceptual motor ability in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 9 (1995) 215