The assumed light direction for perceiving shape from shading

APGV 2008 - Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 135-142

  O'Shea, James P ^a   Banks, Martin S ^a   Agrawala, Maneesh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Lambertian shading.; Light from above; Shape perception; Shape from shading

Indexed keywords

3-D SHAPES; CAST SHADOWS; ILL-POSED PROBLEMS; LAMBERTIAN SHADING.; LIGHT DIRECTIONS; LOCAL SURFACES; SHAPE PERCEPTION; SHAPE-FROM-SHADING; SURFACE ORIENTATIONS; VISUAL SYSTEMS;

LIGHT SOURCES; THREE DIMENSIONAL; VISUALIZATION;

LIGHT;

EID: 63449096996     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1394281.1394306     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. ADAMS, W., GRAF, E., AND ERNST, M. 2004. Experience can change the light-from-above prior. Nature Neuroscience 7, 10,1057-1058.
2. BELHUMEUR, P., KRIEGMAN, D., AND YUILLE, A. 1997. The bas-relief ambiguity. IEEE Computer Science Society Confer-ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1060-1066.
3. CANIARD, F., AND FLEMING, R. 2007. Distortion in 3d shape estimation with changes in illumination. Proceedings of the 4th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization,99-105.
4. CHAMPION, R. A., AND ADAMS, W. J. 2007. Modification of the convexity prior but not the light-from-above prior in visual search with shaded objects. Journal of Vision 7, 13 (10), 1-10.
5. COOK, R. L., AND TORRANCE, K. E. 1982. A reflectance model for computer graphics. ACM Transactions on Graphics 1, 1, 7-24.
6. DECARLO, D., FINKELSTEIN, A., RUSINKIEWICZ, S., AND SANTELLA, A. 2003. Suggestive contours for conveying shape.ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), 848-855.
7. GUMHOLD, S. 2002. Maximum entropy light source placement. In VIS '02: Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '02, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA.
8. HILLIS, J., WATT, S., LANDY, M., AND BANKS, M. 2004. Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision 4, 12 (Dec.), 967-992.
9. HOFFMAN, D. M., GIRSHICK, A. R., AKELEY, K., AND BANKS, M. S. 2008. Vergenceaccommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Journal of Vision 8, 3 (3),1-30.
10. KOENDERINK, J., VAN DOORN, A., AND KAPPERS, A. 1992.Surface perception in pictures. Perception and Psychophysics 5,52, 487-496.
11. KOENDERINK, J., VAN DOORN, A., AND CHRISTOU, C. 1996.Perturbation study of shading in pictures. Perception 25, 1009-1026.
12. LANGER, M., AND BULTHOFF, H. 2001. A prior for global convexity in local shape-from-shading. Perception 30, 403-410.
13. LEE, C. H., AND HAO, X. 2006. Geometry-dependent lighting. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12,2, 197-207. Member-Amitabh Varshney.
14. MAMASSIAN, P., AND GOUTCHER, R. 2001. Prior knowledge on the illumination position. Cognition 81, B1-B9.
15. MAMASSIAN, P., AND KERSTEN, D. 1995. Illumination, shading and the perception of local orientation. Vision Research 36, 15,2351-2367.
16. OLIENSIS, J. 1991. Shape from shading as a partially wellconstrained problem. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 54, 2, 163-183.
17. OREN, M., AND NAYAR, S. K. 1994. Generalization of lambert's reflectance model. In SIGGRAPH '94: Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive tech-niques, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 239-246.
18. PHONG, B. T. 1975. Illumination for computer generated pictures. Communications of the ACM 18, 6, 311-317.
19. PRADOS, E., AND FAUGERAS, O. 2005. Shape From Shading: a well-posed problem? In Proceedings of CVPR'05, vol. 2, 870-877.
20. RUSINKIEWICZ, S., BURNS, M., AND DECARLO, D. 2006. Exaggerated shading for depicting shape and detail. ACM Transac-tions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 25, 3 (July).
21. SHACKED, R., AND LISCHINSKI, D. 2001. Automatic lighting designusing a perceptual quality metric. In EG 2001 Proceedings, vol. 20(3). 215-226.
22. STEVENS, K. A. 1983. Slant-tilt: The visual encoding of surface orientation. Biological Cybernetics 46, 183-195.
23. SUN, J., AND PERONA, P. 1998. Where is the sun? Nature Neuroscience 1, 3 (July), 183-184.
24. TORRANCE, K. E., AND SPARROW, E. M. 1967. Theory for the off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces. Journal of the Optical Society of America 57, 9, 1105-1144.
25. WARD, G. J. 1992. Measuring and modeling anisotropic reflection. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 26, 2, 265-272.
26. WATT, S. J., AKELEY, K., ERNST, M. O., AND BANKS, M. S.2005. Focus cues affect perceived depth. Journal of Vision 5, 10(Dec.), 834-862.