Impact of 2D and 3D vision on performance of novice subjects using da Vinci robotic system

Acta Chirurgica Belgica

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 662-664

  Blavier, A ^a   Gaudissart, Q ^b   Cadiere G B ^b   Nyssen, A S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b SAINT PIERRE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Minimal invasive surgery; Robotic laparoscopy; Training

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846316424     PISSN: 00015458     EISSN: 25770160     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2006.11679976     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. WESTERMAN S. J., CRIBBIN T. Individual differences in the use of depth cues: Implications for computer- and video-based tasks. Acta Psychol, 1998, 99, 293-310.
2. BINGHAM G. P., PAGANO C. C. The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: Monocular distance perception to guide reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 1998, 24: 145-68.
3. JACKSON S. R., JONES C. A., NEWPORT R., PRITCHARD C. A kinematic analysis of goal-directed prehension movements executed under binocular, monocular and memory-guided viewing conditions. Visual Cogn, 1997, 4: 113-42.
4. FALK V., MINTZ D., GRÜNENFELDER J., FANN J. I., BURDON T. A. Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance. Surg Endosc, 2001, 15: 1282-8.
5. SERVOS P. Distance estimation in the visual and visuomotor systems. Exp Brain Res, 2000, 130: 35-47.
6. TAFFINDER N., SMITH S. G. T., HUBER J., RUSSELL R. C. G., DARZI A. The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc, 1999, 13: 1087-92.
7. VAN BERGEN P., KUNERT W., BESSELL J., BUESS G. F. Comparative study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional vision systems for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc, 1998, 12: 948-54.
8. PEITGEN K., WALZ M. V., HOLTMANN G., EIGLER F. W. A prospective randomized experimental evaluation of three-dimensional imaging in laparoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc, 1996, 44: 262-7.
9. DION Y. M., GAILLARD F. Visual integration data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy: Influence of 2-D and 3-D video-camera system. Surg Endosc, 1997, 11: 995-1000.
10. BIRKETT D. H., JOSEPHS L. G., ESTE-MCDONALD J. A new 3-D laparoscope in gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Endosc, 1994, 8: 1448-51.
11. HANNA G. B., SHIMI S. M., CUSCHIERI A. Randomised study on influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet, 1998, 351: 248-51.
12. CROSTHWAITE G., CHUNG T., DUNKLEY P., SHIMI S., CUSCHIERI A. Comparison of direct vision and electronic two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery. Brit J Surg, 1995, 82: 849-51.
13. PIETRABISSA A., SCARCELLO E., MOSCA F. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner. End Surg, 1994, 2: 315-17.
14. GREENWALD H. S., KNILL D. C., SAUNDERS J. A. Integrating visual cues for motor control: A matter of time. Vision Res, 2005, 45: 1975-89.
15. MAZIN L. I. N., LENOIR M. The contribution of stereo vision to one-handed catching. Exp Brain Res, 2004, 157: 383-90.
16. CHAN A. C. W., CHUNG S. C. S., YIM A. P. C., LAU J. Y. W., NG E. K. W., LI A. K. C. Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc, 1997, 11: 438-40.