Influence of 2D and 3D view on performance and time estimation in minimal invasive surgery

Ergonomics

Volumn 52, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1342-1349

  Blavier, A ^a   Nyssen, A S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

2D 3D images; Minimal invasive surgery; New technology; Time estimation; Visuo motor performance

Indexed keywords

2D-3D IMAGES; MINIMAL INVASIVE SURGERY; NEW TECHNOLOGY; TIME ESTIMATION; VISUO-MOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ESTIMATION; MOTORS; SURGERY;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERGONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; MEDICAL EXPERT; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NORMAL HUMAN; NURSING STAFF; OPERATION DURATION; ROBOTICS; SURGEON; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME; WORK EXPERIENCE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO-ASSISTED SURGERY;

EID: 70350714164     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140130903137277     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Avni-Babad, D. and Ritov, I., 2003. Routine and perception of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 4, 543-550.
2. Bingham, G.P. and Pagano, C.C., 1998. The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: Monocular distance perception to guide reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 145-168.
3. Birkett, D.H., Josephs, L.G., and Este-McDonald, J., 1994. A new 3-D laparoscope in gastrointestinal surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 8, 1448-1451.
4. Blavier, A., et al., 2006. Impact of 2D and 3D vision on performance of novice subjects using da Vinci robotic system. Acta Chirurgica Belgica, 106, 662-664.
5. Blavier, A., et al., 2007a. Comparison of learning curves in classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing condition. American Journal of Surgery, 194, 115-121.
6. Blavier, A., et al., 2007b. Perceptual and instrumental impacts of robotic laparoscopy on surgical performance. Surgical Endoscopy, 21, 1875-1882.
7. Blavier, A., et al., 2005. Prospective issues for error detection. Ergonomics, 48, 758-781.
8. Block, R.A., 1978. Remembered duration: Effects of event and sequence complexity. Memory and Cognition, 6, 320-326.
9. Block, R.A., 1985. Contextual coding in memory: Studies of remembered duration. In: J.A. Michon and J.L. Jackson, eds. Time, mind and behaviour. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 169-178.
10. Block, R.A., 1990. Models of psychological time. In: R.A. Block, ed. Cognitive models of psychological time. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1-35.
11. Block, R.A., Hancock, P.A., and Zakay, D., 2000. Sex differences in duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1333-1346.
12. Block, R.A. and Reed, M.A., 1978. Remembered duration: Evidence for a contextual-change hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 656-665.
13. Block, R.A. and Zakay, D., 1997. Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4, 184-197.
14. Block, R.A., Zakay, D., and Hancock, P.A., 1998. Human aging and duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Psychology and Aging, 13, 584-596.
15. Brown, S.W., 1985. Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 115-124.
16. Chan, A.C.W., et al., 1997. Comparison of two-dimensional vs three dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 11, 438-440.
17. Crosthwaite, G., et al., 1995. Comparison of direct vision and electronid two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery. British Journal of Surgery, 82, 849-851.
18. De Keyser, V., 1995. Time in ergonomics research. Ergonomics, 38, 1639-1660.
19. Dion, Y.M. and Gaillard, F., 1997. Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy: Influence of 2-D and 3-D vide-camera systems. Surgical Endoscopy, 11, 995-1000.
20. Espinosa-Fernandez, L., et al., 2003. Age-related changes and gender differences in time estimation. Acta Psychologica, 112, 221-232.
21. Falk, V., et al., 2001. Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance. Surgical Endoscopy, 15, 1282-1288.
22. Fortin, C., Chérif, L., and Neath, I., 2005. Temps et mémoire. Psychologie Française, 50, 81-98.
23. Fraisse, P., 1984. Perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 1-36.
24. Greenwald, H.S., Knill, D.C., and Saunders, J.A., 2005. Integrating visual cues for motor control: A matter of time. Vision Research, 45, 1975-1989.
25. Hanna, G.B., Shimi, S.M., and Cuschieri, A., 1998. Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet, 351, 248-251.
26. Hoffman, D.M., et al., 2008. Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Journal of Vision 8, 1-30.
27. Hubens, G., et al., 2003. A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system. Surgical Endoscopy, 17, 1595-1599.
28. Huber, J.W., et al., 2003. The effects of different viewing conditions on performance in simulated minimal access surgery. Ergonomics, 46, 999-1016.
29. Jackson, S.R., et al., 1997. A kinematic analysis of goaldirected prehension movements executed under binocular, monocular and memory-guided viewing conditions. Visual Cognition, 4, 113-142.
30. Kirckaldy, B.D., 1984. Individual differences in time estimation. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 15, 11-24.
31. Marotta, J.J. and Goodale, M.A., 1998. The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 121, 465-470.
32. McClain, L., 1983. Interval estimation: Effect of processing demands on prospective and retrospective reports. Perception and Psychophysics 34, 185-189.
33. Meesters, L.M.J., IJsselsteijn, W.A., and Seuntiëns, P.J.H., 2004. A survey of perceptual evaluations and requirements of three-dimensional TV. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 14, 381-391.
34. Nyssen, A.S. and Blavier, A., 2006. Error detection: A study in anaesthesia. Ergonomics, 49, 517-525.
35. Nyssen, A.S. and Javaux, D., 1996. Analysis of synchronization constraints and associated errors in collective work environments. Ergonomics, 39, 1249-1264.
36. Ornstein, R.E., 1969. On the experience of time. Penguin: Harmondsworth.
37. Peitgen, K., et al., 1996. A prospective randomized experimental evaluation of three-dimensional imaging in laparoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 44, 262-267.
38. Pietrabissa, A., Scarcello, E., and Mosca, F., 1994. Threedimensional versus two-dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner. Endoscopy Surgery, 2, 315-317.
39. Predebon, J., 1996. The effects of active and passive processing of interval events on prospective and retrospective time estimates. Acta Psychologica, 94, 41-58.
40. Servos, P., 2000. Distance estimation in the visual and visuomotor systems. Experimental Brain Research, 130, 35-47.
41. Taffinder, N., et al., 1999. The effect of a secondgeneration 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surgical Endoscopy, 13, 1087-1092.
42. Van Bergen, P., et al., 1998. Comparative study of twodimensional and three-dimensional vision systems for minimally invasive surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 12, 948-954.
43. Zakay, D., 2005. Attention et jugement temporal. Psychologie Française, 50, 65-79.
44. Zakay, D., 1993. Relative and absolute duration judgments under prospective and retrospective paradigms. Perception and Psychophysics 54, 656-664.
45. Zakay, D., et al., 1994. The role of segmentation in prospective and retrospective time estimation processes. Memory and Cognition, 22, 344-351.