Teaching cardiovascular physiology with equivalent electronic circuits in a practically oriented teaching module

American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 149-160

  Ribarič, Samo ^a   Kordaš, Marjan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Active learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958764138     PISSN: 10434046     EISSN: 15221229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00072.2010     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abram SR, Hodnett BL, Summers RL, Coleman TG, Hester RL. Quantitative Circulatory Physiology: an integrative mathematical model of human physiology for medical education. Adv Physiol Educ 31: 202-110, 2007.
2. Aidley DJ. The Physiology of Excitable Cells. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991.
3. Azevedo R. Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educ Psychol 40: 199-209, 2005.
4. Azevedo R, Moos DC, Greene JA, Winters FI, Cromley JG. Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educ Tech Res Dev 56: 45-72, 2008.
5. Bar-Tal D, Bar-Zobar Y. The relationship between perception of locus of control and achievement: review and some educational implications. Contemp Educ Psychol 2: 181-199, 1977.
6. Bošnjak R, Kordaš M. Circulatory eff ects of internal jugular vein compression: a computer simulation study. Med Biol Eng Comput 40: 423-31, 2002.
7. Buckley GL, Bain NR, Luginbuhl AM, Dyer ML. Adding an "active learning" component to a large lecture course. J Geogr 103: 231-237, 2004.
8. Canfield PJ. An interactive, student-centered approach to teaching largegroup sessions in veterinary clinical pathology. J Vet Med Educ 29: 105-110, 2002.
9. Carrier C. Do learners make good choices? lnstr Innov 29: 13-17, 1984.
10. Carrington JM, Thompson MP. CAL in the biochemical laboratory. Biochem Educ 20: 32-34, 1992.
11. Carvalho H. Active teaching and learning for a deeper understanding of physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 33: 132-133, 2009.
12. Chung DC, Niranjan SC, Clark JW Jr, Bidani A, Johnston WE, Zwischenberger JB, Traber DL. A dynamic model of ventricular interaction and pericardial influence. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 272: H2942-H2962, 1997.
13. Coleman IP, Dewhurst DG, Meehan AS, Williams AD. A computer simulation for learning about the physiological response to exercise. Adv Physiol Educ 11: 2-9, 1994.
14. Corbalan G, Kester L, van Merriënboer JJG. Selecting learning tasks: effects of adaptation and shared control on learning efficiency and task involvement. Contemp Educ Psychol 33: 733-756, 2008.
15. Davis MJ, Gore RW. Determinants of cardiac function: simulation of a dynamic cardiac pump for physiology instruction. Adv Physiol Educ 25: 13-35, 2001.
16. Dewhurst DG, Hardcastle J, Hardcastle PT, Stuart E. Comparison of a computer simulation program and a traditional laboratory practical class for teaching the principles of intestinal absorption. Adv Physiol Educ 12: 95-104, 1994.
17. Dobson JL. Evaluation of the Virtual Physiology of Exercise Laboratory program. Advan Physiol Educ 33: 335-342, 2009.
18. Dolenšek J, Podnar T, Runovc F, Kordaš M. Analog simulation of aortic and of mitral regurgitation. Comput Biol Med 39: 474-481, 2009.
19. Fawver AL, Branch CE, Trentham L, Robertson BT, Beckett SD. A comparison of interactive videodisc instruction with live animal laboratories. Adv Physiol Educ 4: 11-14, 1990.
20. Garfield JM, Paskin S, Philip JH. An evaluation of the effectiveness of a computer simulation of anaesthetic uptake and distribution as a teaching tool. Med Educ 23: 457-462, 1989.
21. Harrold MW. Computer-based exercises to supplement the teaching of stereochemical aspects of drug-action. Am J Pharmaceut Educ 59: 20-26, 1995.
22. Hilligoss T. Demystifying classroom chemistry-the role of the interactive learning-model. Teach Sociol 20: 12-17, 1992.
23. Johansen KJ, Tennyson RD. Effect of adaptive advisement on perception in learner controlled computer-based instruction using a rule-learning task. Educ Commun Technol J 31: 226-236, 1983.
24. Kenner T. Physiology of circulation. In: Cardiology, edited by Dalla Volta S, De Luna AB, Jezek V, Brocher M L, Mortensen S A, Dienstl F, Poole-Wilson P, Braunwald E. London: McGraw-Hill, 1999, p. 19-25.
25. Kordaš M, Trontelj J, Leonardis S. An electrical model of blood circulation. Med Biol Eng 6: 449-451, 1968.
26. Kostons D, van Gog T, Paas F. Self-assessment and task selection in learner-controlled instruction: differences between effective and ineffective learners. Comput Educ 54: 932-940, 2010.
27. Lawless KA, Brown SW. Multimedia learning environments: issues of learner control and navigation. Instr Sci 25: 117-131, 1997.
28. Lefcourt HM. Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory and Research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1982.
29. Lu KJ, Clark JW Jr, Ghorbel FH, Ware DL, Bidani A. A human cardiopulmonary system model applied to the analysis of the Valsalva maneuver. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H2661-H2679, 2001.
30. Merrill MD. Learner control in computer based learning. Comput Educ 4: 77-95, 1980.
31. Min R, de Goeijen J, Sikken J, Coleman T. Simulation Environment (for Learning to Solve Medical Problems). The Cardiovascular System (online). http://projects.edte.utwente.nl/pi/Java/Simulaties/CardioP1/Cardio.htm [24 January 2011].
32. Misner JE, Geesman R, Michael ME. Interactive videodisc calorimetry simulations for exercise physiology laboratories. Adv Physiol Educ 7: 4-8, 1992.
33. Modell HI. Can technology replace live preparations in student laboratories? Adv Physiol Educ 1: 18-20, 1989.
34. Moos DC, Azevedo R. Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: the role of prior domain knowledge. Contemp Educ Psychol 33: 270-298, 2008.
35. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D, Desousa S, Lam-McCullogh J. Applying theory to practice in undergraduate education using high fidelity simulation. Med Teacher 28: e10 e15270-298, 2006.
36. Niemiec RP, Sikorski C, Walberg HJ. Learner-control effects: a review of reviews and a meta-analysis. J Educ Comput Res 15: 157-174, 1996.
37. Ohrn MA, van Oostrom JH, van Meurs WL. A comparison of traditional textbook and interactive computer learning of neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg 84: 657-661, 1997.
38. Perry NW, Huss MT, McAuliff BD, Galas JM. An active-learning approach to teaching the undergraduate psychology and law course. Teach Psychol 23: 76-81, 1996.
39. Podnar T, Runovc F, Kordaš M. Simulation of cardiovascular physiology: the diastolic function(s) of the heart. Comput Biol Med 32: 363-377, 2002.
40. Podnar T, Runovc F, Milisav I, Kordaš M. Simulation of some shortterm control mechanisms in cardiovascular physiology. Comput Biol Med 34: 35-49, 2004.
41. Rawson RE, Quinlan KM. Evaluation of a computer-based approach to teaching acid/base physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 26: 85-97, 2002.
42. Reeves TC. Pseudoscience in computer-based instruction-the case of learner control research. J Comput-Base Instr 20: 39-46, 1993.
43. Richardson DR. Comparison of naive and experienced students of elementary physiology on performance in an advanced course. Adv Physiol Educ 23: 91-95, 2000.
44. Rothe CF, Gersting JM. Cardiovascular interactions: an interactive tutorial and mathematical model. Adv Physiol Educ 26: 98-109, 2002.
45. Rovick AA, Michael JA, Modell HI, Bruce DS, Horwitz B, Adamson T, Richardson DR, Silverthorn DU, Whitescarver SA. How accurate are our assumptions about our students' background knowledge? Adv Physiol Educ 21: 93-101, 1999.
46. Rupnik M, Runovc F, Kordaš M. The use of equivalent electronic circuits in simulating physiological processes. IEEE Trans Educ 44: 384-389, 2001.
47. Rupnik M, Runovc F, Sket D, Kordaš M. Cardiovascular physiology: simulation of steady state and transient phenomena by using the equivalent electronic circuit. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 67: 1-12, 2002.
48. Santiago RS, Okey JR. The Effects of Advisement and Locus of Control on Achievement in Learner-Controlled Instruction (online). http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED330332.pdf [24 January 2011].
49. Scheiter K, Gerjets P. Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educ Psychol Rev 19: 285-307, 2007.
50. Schnackenberg HL, Sullivan HJ. Learner control over full and lean computer-based instruction under differing ability levels. Educ Tech Res Dev 48: 19-35, 2000.
51. Sever M, Podnar T, Runovc F, Kordaš M. Analog simulation of two clinical conditions: (1) acute left ventricle failure; (2) exercise in patient with aortic stenosis. Comput Biol Med 37: 1051-1062, 2007.
52. Shim EB, Leem CH, Abe Y, Noma A. A new multi-scale simulation model of the circulation: from cells to system. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 364: 1483-500, 2006.
53. Sims R, Hedberg J. Dimensions of learner control: a reappraisal of interactive multimedia instruction. In: Intelligence and Multimodality in Multimedia Interfaces: Research and Applications-Proceedings of the IMMI-95 Workshop, edited by Lee J. Edinburgh: AAAI, 1995.
54. Steinberg ER. Cognition and learner control: a literature review, 1977-88. J Comput Based Instr 16: 117-124, 1989.
55. Toth-Cohen S. Computer-assissted instruction as a learning resource for applied anatomy and kinesiology in the occupational therapy curriculum. Am J Occup Ther 49: 821-827, 1995.
56. Uden L, McGuinness VM, Alderson A. A comparative study of learner control and system control in computer-aided learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Uses of Information and Communication Technologies, edited by Benzie D, Passey D. Beijing: IFIP, 2000, p. 367-370.
57. Ursino M, Magosso E. Acute cardiovascular response to isocapnic hypoxia. I. A mathematical model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279: H149-H165, 2000.