Evaluation of the virtual physiology of exercise laboratory program

American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 335-342

  Dobson, John L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Simulationexercise physiology

Indexed keywords

EID: 74549189969     PISSN: 10434046     EISSN: 15221229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00040.2009     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (6th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippicott, Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
2. Carrington JM, Thompson MP. CAL in the biochemical laboratory. Biochem Educ 20: 32-34, 1992.
3. Coleman IP, Dewhurst DG, Meehan AS, Williams AD. A computer simulation for learning about the physiological response to exercise. Adv Physiol Educ 11: 2-9, 1994.
4. Dewhurst DG, Hardcastle J, Hardcastle PT, Stuart E. Comparison of a computer simulation program and a traditional laboratory practical class for teaching the principles of intestinal absorption. Adv Physiol Educ 12: 95-104, 1994.
5. Euliano TY. Small group teaching: clinical correlation with a human patient simulator. Adv Physiol Educ 25: 36-43, 2001.
6. Fawver AL, Branch CE, Trentham L, Robertson BT, Beckett SD. A comparison of interactive videodisc instruction with live animal laboratories. Adv Physiol Educ 259: 11S-14S, 1990.
7. Garfield JM, Paskin S, Philip JH. An evaluation of the effectiveness of a computer simulation of anaesthetic uptake and distribution as a teaching tool. Med Educ 23: 457-462, 1989.
8. Kim JH, Kim WO, Min KT, Yang JY, Nam YT. Learning by computer simulation does not lead to better test performance than textbook study in the diagnosis and treatment of dysrhythmias. J Clin Anesth 14: 395-400, 2002.
9. Kolkorst FW, Buono MJ. Virtual Exercise Physiology Laboratory. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2004.
10. Misner JE, Geesman R, Michael ME. Interactive videodisc calorimetry simulations for exercise physiology laboratories. Adv Physiol Educ 7: 4-8, 1992.
11. Modell HI. Can technology replace live preparations in student laboratories? Adv Physiol Educ 1: 18-20, 1989.
12. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D, Desousa S, Lam-McCullogh J. Applying theory to practice in undergraduate education using high fidelity simulation. Med Teacher 28: e10-e15, 2006.
13. Odenweller CM, Hsu CT, Sipe E, Layshock JP, Varyani S, Rosian RL, DiCarlo SE. Laboratory exercise using "virtual rats" to teach endocrine physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 18: 24-40, 1997.
14. Ohrn MAK, Van Oostrom, Van Meurs WL. A comparison of traditional textbook and interactive computer learning of neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg 84: 657-661, 1997.
15. Ra'anan AW. The evolving role of animal laboratories in physiology instruction. Adv Physiol Educ 29: 144-150, 2005.
16. Ravert P. An integrative review of computer-based simulation in the education process. Comput Inform Nurs 20: 203-208, 2002.
17. Rawson RE, Quinlan KM. Evaluation of a computer-based approach to teaching acid/base physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 26: 85-97, 2002.
18. Samsel RW. Cardiovascular physiology teaching: computer simulations vs. animal demonstrations. Adv Physiol Educ 11: 36-46, 1994.
19. Toth-Cohen S. Computer-assissted instruction as a learning resource for applied anatomy and kinesiology in the occupational therapy curriculum. Am J Occup Ther 49: 821-827, 1995.