Emerging patterns of epigenomic variation

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 242-250

  Milosavljevic, Aleksandar ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYCOMB GROUP PROTEIN;

AGING; ALLELIC IMBALANCE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CPG ISLAND; DNA FOOTPRINTING; DNA METHYLATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EPIGENETICS; GENE CONTROL; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOME IMPRINTING; HUMAN; MONOZYGOTIC TWINS; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; HUMANS;

EID: 79956303357     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: 01689525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.03.001     Document Type: Review

References (112)

1. Jaenisch R., Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat. Genet. 2003, 33:245-254.
2. Bird A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature 2007, 447:396-398.
3. Berger S.L., et al. An operational definition of epigenetics. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:781-783.
4. Bonasio R., et al. Molecular signals of epigenetic states. Science 2010, 330:612-616.
5. Suzuki M.M., Bird A. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9:465-476.
6. Bernstein B.E., et al. The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:1045-1048.
7. Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002, 16:6-21.
8. Beck S. Taking the measure of the methylome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:1026-1028.
9. Woodcock C.L. Chromatin architecture. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2006, 16:213-220.
10. Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 2007, 128:693-705.
11. Bourc'his D., Voinnet O. A small-RNA perspective on gametogenesis, fertilization, and early zygotic development. Science 2010, 330:617-622.
12. Guttman M., et al. Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals. Nature 2009, 458:223-227.
13. Bernstein B.E., et al. The mammalian epigenome. Cell 2007, 128:669-681.
14. Feng S., et al. Epigenetic reprogramming in plant and animal development. Science 2010, 330:622-627.
15. Espada J., Esteller M. DNA methylation and the functional organization of the nuclear compartment. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2010, 21:238-246.
16. Ikegami K., et al. Interplay between DNA methylation, histone modification and chromatin remodeling in stem cells and during development. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2009, 53:203-214.
17. Satterlee J.S., et al. Tackling the epigenome: challenges and opportunities for collaboration. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:1039-1044.
18. Allis C.D., et al. Epigenetics 2007, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
19. Zemach A., Zilberman D. Evolution of eukaryotic DNA methylation and the pursuit of safer sex. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:R780-R785.
20. Zemach A., et al. Genome-wide evolutionary analysis of eukaryotic DNA methylation. Science 2010, 328:916-919.
21. Feng S., et al. Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:8689-8694.
22. Kucharski R., et al. Nutritional control of reproductive status in honeybees via DNA methylation. Science 2008, 319:1827-1830.
23. Fox-Walsh K., Fu X.D. Chromatin: the final frontier in splicing regulation?. Dev. Cell 2010, 18:336-338.
24. Luco R.F., et al. Regulation of alternative splicing by histone modifications. Science 2010, 327:996-1000.
25. Eckhardt F., et al. DNA methylation profiling of human chromosomes 6, 20 and 22. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:1378-1385.
26. Bernstein B.E., et al. Genomic maps and comparative analysis of histone modifications in human and mouse. Cell 2005, 120:169-181.
27. Ryba T., et al. Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types. Genome Res. 2010, 20:761-770.
28. Enard W., Paabo S. Comparative primate genomics. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2004, 5:351-378.
29. Zoghbi H.Y., Beaudet A.L. Epigenetics and human disease. Epigenetics 2007, 435-456. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York. C.D. Allis (Ed.).
30. Gimelbrant A., et al. Widespread monoallelic expression on human autosomes. Science 2007, 318:1136-1140.
31. Kerkel K., et al. Genomic surveys by methylation-sensitive SNP analysis identify sequence-dependent allele-specific DNA methylation. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40:904-908.
32. Schalkwyk L.C., et al. Allelic skewing of DNA methylation is widespread across the genome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 86:196-212.
33. Li Y., et al. The DNA methylome of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000533.
34. Tycko B. Mapping allele-specific DNA methylation: a new tool for maximizing information from GWAS. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 86:109-112.
35. McDaniell R., et al. Heritable individual-specific and allele-specific chromatin signatures in humans. Science 2010, 328:235-239.
36. Dindot S.V., et al. Epigenetic profiling at mouse imprinted gene clusters reveals novel epigenetic and genetic features at differentially methylated regions. Genome Res. 2009, 19:1374-1383.
37. Harris R.A., et al. Comparison of sequencing-based methods to profile DNA methylation and identification of monoallelic epigenetic modifications. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:1097-1105.
38. Cahan P., et al. The impact of copy number variation on local gene expression in mouse hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41:430-437.
39. Wan L.B., Bartolomei M.S. Regulation of imprinting in clusters: noncoding RNAs versus insulators. Adv. Genet. 2008, 61:207-223.
40. Lewis A., Reik W. How imprinting centres work. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2006, 113:81-89.
41. Gregg C., et al. High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science 2010, 329:643-648.
42. Gregg C., et al. Sex-specific parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science 2010, 329:682-685.
43. Abdalla H., et al. Active demethylation of paternal genome in mammalian zygotes. J. Reprod. Dev. 2009, 55:356-360.
44. Popp C., et al. Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature 2010, 463:1101-1105.
45. Hajkova P., et al. Genome-wide reprogramming in the mouse germ line entails the base excision repair pathway. Science 2010, 329:78-82.
46. Lister R., et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature 2009, 462:315-322.
47. Laurent L., et al. Dynamic changes in the human methylome during differentiation. Genome Res. 2010, 20:320-331.
48. Bernstein B.E., et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2006, 125:315-326.
49. Schuettengruber B., et al. Genome regulation by polycomb and trithorax proteins. Cell 2007, 128:735-745.
50. Illingworth R.S., Bird A. CpG islands - 'a rough guide'. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583:1713-1720.
51. Jones P.A., Baylin S.B. The epigenomics of cancer. Cell 2007, 128:683-692.
52. Portela A., Esteller M. Epigenetic modifications and human disease. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:1057-1068.
53. Hawkins R.D., et al. Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 6:479-491.
54. van Arensbergen J., et al. Derepression of Polycomb targets during pancreatic organogenesis allows insulin-producing beta-cells to adopt a neural gene activity program. Genome Res. 2010, 20:722-732.
55. Weber M., et al. Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39:457-466.
56. Yagi S., et al. DNA methylation profile of tissue-dependent and differentially methylated regions (T-DMRs) in mouse promoter regions demonstrating tissue-specific gene expression. Genome Res. 2008, 18:1969-1978.
57. Brunner A.L., et al. Distinct DNA methylation patterns characterize differentiated human embryonic stem cells and developing human fetal liver. Genome Res. 2009, 19:1044-1056.
58. Ji H., et al. Comprehensive methylome map of lineage commitment from haematopoietic progenitors. Nature 2010, 467:338-342.
59. Schmidl C., et al. Lineage-specific DNA methylation in T cells correlates with histone methylation and enhancer activity. Genome Res. 2009, 19:1165-1174.
60. Marson A., et al. Connecting microRNA genes to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells. Cell 2008, 134:521-533.
61. Mohammad H., Baylin S.B. Linking cell signaling and the epigenetic machinery. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:1033-1038.
62. Cuddapah S., et al. Global analysis of the insulator binding protein CTCF in chromatin barrier regions reveals demarcation of active and repressive domains. Genome Res. 2009, 19:24-32.
63. Eeckhoute J., et al. Cell-type selective chromatin remodeling defines the active subset of FOXA1-bound enhancers. Genome Res. 2009, 19:372-380.
64. Cheng Y., et al. Erythroid GATA1 function revealed by genome-wide analysis of transcription factor occupancy, histone modifications, and mRNA expression. Genome Res. 2009, 19:2172-2184.
65. Hsu P.Y., et al. Estrogen-mediated epigenetic repression of large chromosomal regions through DNA looping. Genome Res. 2010, 20:733-744.
66. Weaver I.C., et al. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:847-854.
67. Jirtle R.L., Skinner M.K. Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:253-262.
68. Tobi E.W., et al. DNA methylation differences after exposure to prenatal famine are common and timing- and sex-specific. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18:4046-4053.
69. Daxinger L., Whitelaw E. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: more questions than answers. Genome Res. 2010, 20:1623-1628.
70. Fraga M.F., et al. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:10604-10609.
71. Petronis A. The origin of schizophrenia: genetic thesis, epigenetic antithesis, and resolving synthesis. Biol. Psychiatry 2004, 55:965-970.
72. Petronis A. Epigenetics as a unifying principle in the aetiology of complex traits and diseases. Nature 2010, 465:721-727.
73. Baranzini S.E., et al. Genome, epigenome and RNA sequences of monozygotic twins discordant for multiple sclerosis. Nature 2010, 464:1351-1356.
74. Issa J.P., et al. Methylation of the oestrogen receptor CpG island links ageing and neoplasia in human colon. Nat. Genet. 1994, 7:536-540.
75. Kwabi-Addo B., et al. Age-related DNA methylation changes in normal human prostate tissues. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13:3796-3802.
76. Bjornsson H.T., et al. Intra-individual change over time in DNA methylation with familial clustering. JAMA 2008, 299:2877-2883.
77. Boks M.P., et al. The relationship of DNA methylation with age, gender and genotype in twins and healthy controls. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e6767.
78. Christensen B.C., et al. Aging and environmental exposures alter tissue-specific DNA methylation dependent upon CpG island context. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000602.
79. Rakyan V.K., et al. Human aging-associated DNA hypermethylation occurs preferentially at bivalent chromatin domains. Genome Res. 2010, 20:434-439.
80. Teschendorff A.E., et al. Age-dependent DNA methylation of genes that are suppressed in stem cells is a hallmark of cancer. Genome Res. 2010, 20:440-446.
81. Maegawa S., et al. Widespread and tissue specific age-related DNA methylation changes in mice. Genome Res. 2010, 20:332-340.
82. Thompson R.F., et al. Tissue-specific dysregulation of DNA methylation in aging. Aging Cell 2010, 9:506-518.
83. Bock C., Lengauer T. Computational epigenetics. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:1-10.
84. Lim S.J., et al. Computational Epigenetics: the new scientific paradigm. Bioinformation 2010, 4:331-337.
85. Turner B.M. Defining an epigenetic code. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:2-6.
86. Heintzman N.D., et al. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39:311-318.
87. Koch C.M., et al. The landscape of histone modifications across 1% of the human genome in five human cell lines. Genome Res. 2007, 17:691-707.
88. Hoffman B.G., et al. Locus co-occupancy, nucleosome positioning, and H3K4me1 regulate the functionality of FOXA2-, HNF4A-, and PDX1-bound loci in islets and liver. Genome Res. 2010, 20:1037-1051.
89. Mikkelsen T.S., et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 2007, 448:553-560.
90. Thurman R.E., et al. Identification of higher-order functional domains in the human ENCODE regions. Genome Res. 2007, 17:917-927.
91. Ernst J., Kellis M. Discovery and characterization of chromatin states for systematic annotation of the human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:817-825.
92. van Steensel B., et al. Bayesian network analysis of targeting interactions in chromatin. Genome Res. 2010, 20:190-200.
93. Milosavljevic A. Putting epigenome comparison into practice. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:1053-1056.
94. Cowin S.C. Tissue growth and remodeling. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2004, 6:77-107.
95. Peirce S.M., et al. Multicellular simulation predicts microvascular patterning and in silico tissue assembly. FASEB J. 2004, 18:731-733.
96. Mitchell M. Complexity: a guided tour 2009, Oxford University Press, Oxford England; New York, xvi, p. 349.
97. Gardiner-Garden M., Frommer M. CpG islands in vertebrate genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 1987, 196:261-282.
98. Takai D., Jones P.A. Comprehensive analysis of CpG islands in human chromosomes 21 and 22. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99:3740-3745.
99. Chang H.Y. Anatomic demarcation of cells: genes to patterns. Science 2009, 326:1206-1207.
100. Chen L.L., Carmichael G.G. Decoding the function of nuclear long non-coding RNAs. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2010, 22:357-364.
101. Hekimoglu B., Ringrose L. Non-coding RNAs in polycomb/trithorax regulation. RNA Biol. 2009, 6:129-137.
102. John S., et al. Interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor with the chromatin landscape. Mol. Cell 2008, 29:611-624.
103. Bock C., et al. Quantitative comparison of genome-wide DNA methylation mapping technologies. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:1106-1114.
104. Coarfa C., et al. Pash 3.0: a versatile software package for read mapping and integrative analysis of genomic and epigenomic variation using massively parallel DNA sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:572.
105. Polikepahad S., et al. Proinflammatory role for let-7 microRNAS in experimental asthma. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:30139-30149.
106. Robertson G., et al. Genome-wide profiles of STAT1 DNA association using chromatin immunoprecipitation and massively parallel sequencing. Nat. Methods 2007, 4:651-657.
107. Hesselberth J.R., et al. Global mapping of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by digital genomic footprinting. Nat. Methods 2009, 6:283-289.
108. Miele A., et al. Mapping chromatin interactions by chromosome conformation capture. Curr. Protoc Mol. Biol. 2006, Chapter 21, Unit 21 11.
109. Rakyan V.K., et al. An integrated resource for genome-wide identification and analysis of human tissue-specific differentially methylated regions (tDMRs). Genome Res. 2008, 18:1518-1529.
110. Flicek P., et al. Ensembl. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39(Database issue):D800-806.
111. Fingerman I.M., et al. NCBI Epigenomics: a new public resource for exploring epigenomic data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39(Database issue):D908-912.
112. Raney B.J., et al. ENCODE whole-genome data in the UCSC genome browser (2011 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39(Database issue):D871-875.