Understanding and predicting synthetic lethal genetic interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using domain genetic interactions

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 5, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Li, Bo ^a   Cao, Weiguo ^b   Zhou, Jizhong ^c   Luo, Feng ^a  

^a Clemson University   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

FUNGAL PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; FUNGAL GENE; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GENES, FUNGAL; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 79955972981     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-73     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Hartman J, Garvik B, Hartwell L. Principles for the buffering of genetic variation. Science 2001, 291:1001-1004. 10.1126/science.291.5506.1001, 11232561.
2. Mani R, St Onge RP, Hartman JL, Giaever G, Roth FP. Defining genetic interaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008, 105(9):3461-3461.
3. Ye P, Peyser BD, Pan X, Boeke JD, Spencer FA, Bader JS. Gene function prediction from congruent synthetic lethal interactions in yeast. Molecular Systems Biology 2005, 1(1).
4. Wong SL, Zhang LV, Roth FP. Discovering functional relationships: biochemistry versus genetics. Trends Genet 2005, 21(8):424-427. 10.1016/j.tig.2005.06.006, 15982781.
5. Kaelin WG. The concept of synthetic lethality in the context of anticancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2005, 5(9):689-698. 10.1038/nrc1691, 16110319.
6. Ooi SL, Pan X, Peyser BD, Ye P, Meluh PB, Yuan DS, Irizarry RA, Bader JS, Spencer FA, Boeke JD. Global synthetic-lethality analysis and yeast functional profiling. Trends Genet 2006, 22(1):56-63. 10.1016/j.tig.2005.11.003, 16309778.
7. Winzeler EA, Shoemaker DD, Astromoff A, Liang H, Anderson K, Andre B, Bangham R, Benito R, Boeke JD, Bussey H, et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 1999, 285(5429):901-906. 10.1126/science.285.5429.901, 10436161.
8. Tong AH, Evangelista M, Parsons AB, Xu H, Bader GD, Page N, Robinson M, Raghibizadeh S, Hogue CW, Bussey H, et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 2001, 294(5550):2364-2368. 10.1126/science.1065810, 11743205.
9. Pan X, Yuan DS, Ooi SL, Wang X, Sookhai-Mahadeo S, Meluh P, Boeke JD. dSLAM analysis of genome-wide genetic interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods 2007, 41(2):206-221. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.07.033, 2491713, 17189863.
10. Chipman KC, Singh AK. Predicting genetic interactions with random walks on biological networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:17. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-17, 2653491, 19138426.
11. Qi Y, Suhail Y, Lin YY, Boeke JD, Bader JS. Finding friends and enemies in an enemies-only network: a graph diffusion kernel for predicting novel genetic interactions and co-complex membership from yeast genetic interactions. Genome Res 2008, 18(12):1991-2004. 10.1101/gr.077693.108, 2593582, 18832443.
12. Wong SL, Zhang LV, Tong AHY, Li Z, Goldberg DS, King OD, Lesage G, Vidal M, Andrews B, Bussey H. Combining biological networks to predict genetic interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2004, 101(44):15682-15687.
13. Paladugu S, Zhao S, Ray A, Raval A. Mining protein networks for synthetic genetic interactions. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(1):426-426. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-426, 2577120, 18844977.
14. Zhong W, Sternberg PW. Genome-wide prediction of C. elegans genetic interactions. Science 2006, 311(5766):1481-1484. 10.1126/science.1123287, 16527984.
15. Park CY, Hess DC, Huttenhower C, Troyanskaya OG. Simultaneous genome-wide inference of physical, genetic, regulatory, and functional pathway components. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6(11):e1001009. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001009, 2991250, 21124865.
16. Li B, Luo F. Predicting yeast synthetic lethal genetic interactions using protein domains. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). Washington DC 2009, 43-47.
17. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 1977, 39(1):1-38.
18. Deng M, Mehta S, Sun F, Chen T. Inferring domain-domain interactions from protein-protein interactions. Proceedings of the sixth annual international conference on Computational biology: 2002; Washington, DC, USA 2002, 117-126. ACM.
19. Riley R, Lee C, Sabatti C, Eisenberg D. Inferring protein domain interactions from databases of interacting proteins. Genome Biology 2005, 6(10):R89-R89. 10.1186/gb-2005-6-10-r89, 1257472, 16207360.
20. Finn RD, Marshall M, Bateman A. iPfam: visualization of protein-protein interactions in PDB at domain and amino acid resolutions. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(3):410-412. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti011, 15353450.
21. Le Meur N, Gentleman R. Modeling synthetic lethality. Genome Biology 2008, 9(9):R135. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r135, 2592713, 18789146.
22. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 1998, 393(6684):440-442. 10.1038/30918, 9623998.
23. Barabási AL, Albert R. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science 1999, 286(5439):509-512. 10.1126/science.286.5439.509, 10521342.
24. Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 2004, 5(2):101-113. 10.1038/nrg1272, 14735121.
25. Apic G, Gough J, Teichmann SA. Domain combinations in archaeal, eubacterial and eukaryotic proteomes. J Mol Biol 2001, 310(2):311-325. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4776, 11428892.
26. Vogel C, Teichmann SA, Pereira-Leal J. The relationship between domain duplication and recombination. J Mol Biol 2005, 346(1):355-365. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.11.050, 15663950.
27. Mullen JR, Kaliraman V, Brill SJ. Bipartite structure of the SGS1 DNA helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2000, 154(3):1101-1114. 1460973, 10757756.
28. Spellman PT, Sherlock G, Zhang MQ, Iyer VR, Anders K, Eisen MB, Brown PO, Botstein D, Futcher B. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol Biol Cell 1998, 9(12):3273-3297. 25624, 9843569.
29. Tong AHY, Lesage G, Bader GD, Ding H, Xu H, Xin X, Young J, Berriz GF, Brost RL, Chang M, et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 2004, 303(5659). 808-813-808-813.
30. Wilcox CB, Rossettini A, Hanes SD. Genetic Interactions With C-Terminal Domain (CTD) Kinases and the CTD of RNA Pol II Suggest a Role for ESS1 in Transcription Initiation and Elongation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2004, 167(1):93-105. 10.1534/genetics.167.1.93, 1470855, 15166139.
31. Malagon F, Tong AH, Shafer BK, Strathern JN. Genetic interactions of DST1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae suggest a role of TFIIS in the initiation-elongation transition. Genetics 2004, 166(3):1215-1227. 10.1534/genetics.166.3.1215, 1470799, 15082542.
32. Archambault J, Lacroute F, Ruet A, Friesen JD. Genetic interaction between transcription elongation factor TFIIS and RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol 1992, 12(9):4142-4152. 360315, 1508210.
33. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, (32 Database):D277-280.
34. Shor E, Gangloff S, Wagner M, Weinstein J, Price G, Rothstein R. Mutations in Homologous Recombination Genes Rescue top3 Slow Growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2002, 162(2):647-662. 1462310, 12399378.
35. Jessulat M, Alamgir M, Salsali H, Greenblatt J, Xu J, Golshani A. Interacting proteins Rtt109 and Vps75 affect the efficiency of non-homologous end-joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch Biochem Biophys 2008, 469(2):157-164. 10.1016/j.abb.2007.11.001, 18036332.
36. Edwards S, Li CM, Levy DL, Brown J, Snow PM, Campbell JL. Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA Polymerase {varepsilon} and Polymerase {sigma} Interact Physically and Functionally, Suggesting a Role for Polymerase {varepsilon} in Sister Chromatid Cohesion. Mol Cell Biol 2003, 23(8):2733-2748. 10.1128/MCB.23.8.2733-2748.2003, 152548, 12665575.
37. Kelley R, Ideker T. Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks. Nature biotechnology 2005, 23(5):561-566. 10.1038/nbt1096, 2814446, 15877074.
38. Ma X, Tarone AM, Li W. Mapping Genetically Compensatory Pathways from Synthetic Lethal Interactions in Yeast. PLoS ONE 2008, 3(4):e1922. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001922, 2275788, 18398455.
39. Cherry JM, Adler C, Ball C, Chervitz SA, Dwight SS, Hester ET, Jia Y, Juvik G, Roe T, Schroeder M. SGD: Saccharomyces genome database. Nucleic Acids Research 1998, 26(1):73-73. 10.1093/nar/26.1.73, 147204, 9399804.
40. Johnson-Schlitz DM, Flores C, Engels WR. Multiple-Pathway Analysis of Double-Strand Break Repair Mutations in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 2007, 3(4):e50. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030050, 1851981, 17432935.
41. Pastwa E, Blasiak J. Non-homologous DNA end joining. Acta Biochim Pol 2003, 50:891-908.
42. Therizols P, Fairhead C, Cabal GG, Genovesio A, Olivo-Marin JC, Dujon B, Fabre E. Telomere tethering at the nuclear periphery is essential for efficient DNA double strand break repair in subtelomeric region. The Journal of Cell Biology 2006, 172(2):189-199. 10.1083/jcb.200505159, 2063549, 16418532.
43. Nagai S, Dubrana K, Tsai-Pflugfelder M, Davidson MB, Roberts TM, Brown GW, Varela E, Hediger F, Gasser SM, Krogan NJ. Functional Targeting of DNA Damage to a Nuclear Pore-Associated SUMO-Dependent Ubiquitin Ligase. Science 2008, 322(5901):597-602. 10.1126/science.1162790, 18948542.
44. Burgess RC, Rahman S, Lisby M, Rothstein R, Zhao X. The Slx5-Slx8 Complex Affects Sumoylation of DNA Repair Proteins and Negatively Regulates Recombination. Mol Cell Biol 2007, 27(17):6153-6162. 10.1128/MCB.00787-07, 1952148, 17591698.
45. de la Torre-Ruiz M-A, Lowndes NF. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint is required for efficient repair of double strand breaks by non-homologous end joining. FEBS Letters 2000, 467(2-3):311-315. 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01180-7, 10675560.
46. Bishop DK. RecA homologs Dmc1 and Rad51 interact to form multiple nuclear complexes prior to meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 1994, 79(6):1081-1092. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90038-8, 7528104.
47. Masson JY, West SC. The Rad51 and Dmc1 recombinases: a non-identical twin relationship. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 2001, 26(2):131-136. 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01742-4, 11166572.
48. Sung P. Yeast Rad55 and Rad57 proteins form a heterodimer that functions with replication protein A to promote DNA strand exchange by Rad51 recombinase. Genes & Development 1997, 11(9):1111-1121. 10.1101/gad.11.9.1111, 21598312.
49. Mimitou EP, Symington LS. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 2008, 455(7214):770-774. 10.1038/nature07312, 18806779.
50. Guillet M, Boiteux S. Endogenous DNA abasic sites cause cell death in the absence of Apn1, Apn2 and Rad1/Rad10 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 2002, 21(11):2833-2841. 10.1093/emboj/21.11.2833, 126023, 12032096.
51. Vance JR, Wilson TE. Yeast Tdp1 and Rad1-Rad10 function as redundant pathways for repairing Top1 replicative damage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2002, 99(21):13669-13674. 10.1073/pnas.202242599, 129737, 12368472.
52. Kaliraman V, Mullen JR, Fricke WM, Bastin-Shanower SA, Brill SJ. Functional overlap between Sgs1-Top3 and the Mms4-Mus81 endonuclease. Genes & Development 2001, 15(20):2730-2740. 10.1101/gad.932201, 21598312.
53. Swanson RL, Morey NJ, Doetsch PW, Jinks-Robertson S. Overlapping Specificities of Base Excision Repair, Nucleotide Excision Repair, Recombination, and Translesion Synthesis Pathways for DNA Base Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1999, 19(4):2929-2935. 84087, 10082560.
54. D'Amours D, Jackson SP. The Mre11 complex: at the crossroads of dna repair and checkpoint signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002, 3(5):317-327. 10.1038/nrm805, 11988766.
55. Lisby M, Rothstein R, Mortensen UH. Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98(15):8276-8282. 10.1073/pnas.121006298, 37432, 11459964.
56. Johnson RE, Prakash S, Prakash L. Yeast DNA repair protein RAD5 that promotes instability of simple repetitive sequences is a DNA-dependent ATPase. J Biol Chem 1994, 269(45):28259-28262.
57. Dimmer KS, Jakobs S, Vogel F, Altmann K, Westermann B. Mdm31 and Mdm32 are inner membrane proteins required for maintenance of mitochondrial shape and stability of mitochondrial DNA nucleoids in yeast. J Cell Biol 2005, 168(1):103-115. 2171677, 15631992.
58. Boone C, Bussey H, Andrews BJ. Exploring genetic interactions and networks with yeast. Nature Reviews Genetics 2007, 8(6):437-449. 10.1038/nrg2085, 17510664.
59. Bateman A, Birney E, Cerruti L, Durbin R, Etwiller L, Eddy SR, Griffiths-Jones S, Howe KL, Marshall M, Sonnhammer ELL. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic acids research 2002, 30(1):276-276. 10.1093/nar/30.1.276, 99071, 11752314.
60. Fortes P, Kufel J, Fornerod M, Polycarpou-Schwarz M, Lafontaine D, Tollervey D, Mattaj IW. Genetic and physical interactions involving the yeast nuclear cap-binding complex. Mol Cell Biol 1999, 19(10):6543-6553. 84624, 10490594.
61. Tong AH, Lesage G, Bader GD, Ding H, Xu H, Xin X, Young J, Berriz GF, Brost RL, Chang M, et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 2004, 303(5659):808-813. 10.1126/science.1091317, 14764870.
62. Krogan NJ, Kim M, Tong A, Golshani A, Cagney G, Canadien V, Richards DP, Beattie BK, Emili A, Boone C, et al. Methylation of histone H3 by Set2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is linked to transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol 2003, 23(12):4207-4218. 10.1128/MCB.23.12.4207-4218.2003, 427527, 12773564.
63. Huang D, Moffat J, Andrews B. Dissection of a complex phenotype by functional genomics reveals roles for the yeast cyclin-dependent protein kinase Pho85 in stress adaptation and cell integrity. Mol Cell Biol 2002, 22(14):5076-5088. 10.1128/MCB.22.14.5076-5088.2002, 139770, 12077337.
64. Goehring AS, Mitchell DA, Tong AH, Keniry ME, Boone C, Sprague GF. Synthetic lethal analysis implicates Ste20p, a p21-activated potein kinase, in polarisome activation. Mol Biol Cell 2003, 14(4):1501-1516. 10.1091/mbc.E02-06-0348, 153118, 12686605.
65. Kozminski KG, Beven L, Angerman E, Tong AH, Boone C, Park HO. Interaction between a Ras and a Rho GTPase couples selection of a growth site to the development of cell polarity in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2003, 14(12):4958-4970. 10.1091/mbc.E03-06-0426, 284798, 12960420.
66. Davierwala AP, Haynes J, Li Z, Brost RL, Robinson MD, Yu L, Mnaimneh S, Ding H, Zhu H, Chen Y, et al. The synthetic genetic interaction spectrum of essential genes. Nat Genet 2005, 37(10):1147-1152. 10.1038/ng1640, 16155567.
67. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 2003, 13(11):2498-2504. 10.1101/gr.1239303, 403769, 14597658.