Optimising the use of interactive whiteboards: An application of developmental work research (DWR) in the United Kingdom

Professional Development in Education

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 469-483

  Glover, Derek ^a   Miller, David ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956786323     PISSN: 19415257     EISSN: 19415265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19415250902731553     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baumfield, V. 2006. Tools for pedagogical inquiry: the impact of teaching thinking skills on teachers. Oxford Review of Education, 32(2): 185-196.
2. Bayliss, T. and Collins, L. 2007. Invigorating teaching with interactive whiteboards: case studies. Teaching Geography,: 34-41.
3. BECTA. 2004. Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard, Sheffield: BECTA.
4. Berliner, D. C. 2001. Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5): 463-482.
5. Borko, H. 2004. Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8): 3-15.
6. Butler, D. L., Lauscher, H. N., Jarvis-Selinger, S. and Beckingham, B. 2004. Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers' professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(5): 435
7. Clarke, J., Egan, B., Fletcher, L. and Ryan, C. 2006. Creating case studies of practice through appreciative inquiry. Educational Action Research, 14(3): 407-422.
8. Coombs, S. and Denning, A. Designing impact: integrating accredited CPD activity into the workforce. paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Professional Development Association. December9-10, Birmingham, UK.
9. Engestrom, Y. 1987. Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research, Helsinki: Orienta.
10. Engestrom, Y. 1997. Learning by expanding: ten years later, Marburg: Bd Wi-Verlag.
11. Engestrom, Y. 2001. Expansive learning at work: towards and activity theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1): 133-156.
12. Erickson, G., Brandes, G. M., Mitchell, I. and Mitchell, J. 2005. Collaborative teacher learning: findings from two professional development projects. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(7): 787-798.
13. Farmer, J. D., Gerretson, H. and Lassak, M. 2003. What teachers take from professional development: cases and implications. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(4): 331-360.
14. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L. and Fennema, E. 2003. Capturing teachers generative change: a follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3): 653-689.
15. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F. and Yoon, K. S. 2001. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4): 921-958.
16. Glazera, E. M. and Hannafin, M. J. 2006. The collaborative apprenticeship model: situated professional development within school settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22: 179-193.
17. Glover, D., Miller, D. and Averis, D. Panacea or prop: the role of the interactive whiteboard in improving teaching effectiveness. paper presented at the 10th International Congress of Mathematics Education,. July4-11, Copenhagen.
18. Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D. and Door, V. 2005. The interactive whiteboard: a literature survey. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 14(2): 155
19. Hall, I. and Higgins, S. 2005. Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2): 102-117.
20. Harland, J. and Kinder, K. 1997. Teachers' continuing professional development: framing a model of outcomes. Journal of In-service Education, 23(1): 71-84.
21. Hingst, R. D. Twentieth century management theory in to-day's organisation. paper presented at the Business and Economics Society International Conference. July15-19, Florence, Italy.
22. Jamissen, G. and Phelps, R. 2006. The role of reflection and mentoring in ICT teacher professional development: dialogue and learning across the hemispheres. Teacher Development, 10(3): 293-312.
23. Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Jones, S. and Beauchamp, G. 2008. Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1): 61-73.
24. Knight, P. 2002. A systemic approach to professional development: learning as practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(3): 229-241.
25. Leadbetter, J., Daniels, H.Edwards, A. 2007. Professional learning within multi-agency children's services: researching into practice. Educational Research, 49(1): 83
26. Lin, P.-J. 2007. The effect of a mentoring development program on mentors' conceptualizing mathematics teaching and mentoring Available online at: http://www.emis.de/proceedings/PME31/3/2001.pdf (accessed 12 May, 2009)
27. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundy, S. and Hewson, P. 2003. Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics, (2nd edn), Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
28. Miller, D. J. and Glover, D. 2004. Enhancing mathematics teaching through new technology: the use of the interactive whiteboard Summary of a report made to the Nuffield Foundation on completion of a funded two year project (April 2002-March 2004). Available online at:http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/ed/iaw/nuffield.htm
29. Miller, D. J. and Glover, D. 2006. Interactive whiteboard evaluation for the secondary national strategy: developing the use of interactive whiteboards in mathematics Final Report for the Secondary National Strategy. Available online at:http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/keystage3/downloads/ma_iaw_eval_rpt.pdf
30. Miller, D. J., Glover, D. and Averis, D. 2005. Developing pedagogic skills for the use of the interactive whiteboard in mathematics, Glamorgan: British Educational Research Association. Available online at: http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/ed/iaw/docs/BERA%20Paper%20Sep%202005.pdf
31. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R. and Gallagher, L. P. 2007. What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4): 921-958.
32. Schrum, L., Burbank, M. D., Engle, J., Chambers, J. A. and Glassett, K. F. 2005. Post-secondary educators' professional development: investigation of an online approach to enhancing teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(4): 279-289.
33. Schussler, D. L., Poole, I. R., Whitlock, T. W. and Evertson, C. M. 2007. Layers and links: learning to juggle 'one more thing' in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5): 572-583.
34. Slay, H., Sieborger, I. and Hodgkinson-William, C. 2008. Interactive whiteboards: real beauty or just 'lipstick'?. Computers and Education, 51(3): 1328-1341.
35. Smith, F., Hardman, F. and Higgins, S. 2006. The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3): 443-457.
36. Tearle, P. 2003. Enabling teachers to use information and communications technology for teaching and learning through professional development: influential factors. Teacher Development, 7(3): 457-472.
37. Tuckman, B. 1965. Development sequences in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63: 384-399.
38. Warmington, P., Daniels, H., Edwards, A., Brown, S., Leadbetter, J., Martin, D., Middleton, D., Parsons, S. and Popova, A. Learning in and for interagency working: a developmental work research intervention. paper presented at the International Conference on Researching Work and Learning. July4, Sydney, NSW.