Learning sciences

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 329-345

  Nathan, Mitchell J ^a   Alibali, Martha Wagner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951593835     PISSN: 19395078     EISSN: 19395086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcs.54     Document Type: Article

References (141)

1. Simon HA. The Sciences of the Artificial. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1996.
2. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments, National Research Council. In: Bell P, Lewenstein B, Shouse AW, Feder MA, eds. Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2009.
3. Shaffer DW. Pedagogical praxis: the professions as models for post-industrial education. Teach Coll Rec 2004, 106:1401-1421.
4. Kaput J. Democratizing access to calculus: new routes using old roots. In: Schoenfeld A, ed. Mathematical Thinking and Problem Solving. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1994, 77-155.
5. Lee CD. Revisiting playing in the Dark: The Hidden Games of Racialization in literacy studies and school reform. In: Stuart G, ed. Literacy as a Civil Right: Reclaiming Social Justice in Literacy Teaching. New York: Peter Lang; 2008.
6. Lee CD. A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Res Q 1995, 30:608-630.
7. Cobb P, Yackel E, Wood T. A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind. J ResMath Educ 1992, 23:2-33.
8. Steffe LP, Thompson PW. Interaction or intersubjectivity? A reply to Lerman. J Res Math Educ 2000, 31:191-209.
9. von Glasersfeld E. Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning.Washington, DC: The Falmer Press; 1995.
10. Brown AL, Campione JC. Guided discovery in a community of learners. In: McGilly K, ed. Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books; 1994, 229-270.
11. Greeno JG. On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educ Researcher 1997, 26:5-17.
12. Greeno JG. The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. Am Psychol 1998, 53:5-26.
13. Hutchins E. cognition in the wild, Cambridge MA: MIT Press; 1995.
14. Pea RD. Practices of distributed intelligences and designs for education. In: Salomon G, ed. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993, 88-110.
15. Salomon G. No distribution without individual's cognition: a dynamic interactional view. In: Salomon G, ed. Distributed Cognitions. Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1993, 111-138.
16. Salomon G, Perkins DN. Individual and social aspects of learning. Rev Res Educ 1998, 23:1-24.
17. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
18. Scardamalia M, Bereiter C. Computer support for knowledge-building communities. J Learn Sci 1994, 3:265-283.
19. Sfard A. Thinking as Communicating: Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
20. Hmelo-Silver CE. Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educ Psychol Rev 2004, 16:235-266.
21. Kolodner JL, Camp PJ, Crismond D, Fasse B, Gray J, et al. Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: putting learning by Design™ into practice. J Lear Sci 2003, 12:495-547.
22. Bransford JD, Schwartz DL. Rethinking transfer: a simple proposal with multiple implications. In: Iran-Nejad A, Pearson PD, eds. Review of Research in Education., vol. 24, Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 1999, 61-101.
23. Ellis AB. A taxonomy for categorizing generalizations: generalizing actions and reflection generalizations. J Lear Sci 2007, 16:221-262.
24. Alibali MW. Mechanisms of change in the development of mathematical reasoning. In: Kail R, ed. Advances in Child Development & Behavior., vol. 33, New York: Academic Press; 2005, 79-123.
25. Siegler RS. Emerging Minds: The Process of Change in Children's Thinking. New York: Oxford; 1996.
26. Bronfenbrenner U. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979.
27. Strom D, Kemeny V, Lehrer R, Forman E. Visualizing the emergent structure of children's mathematical argument. Cogn Sci 2001, 25:733-773.
28. Vosniadou S, Brewer WF.Mental models of the earth: a study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognit Psychol 1992, 24:535-585.
29. GrannottN, Parziale J. Microdevelopment: Transition Processes in Development and Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
30. Bransford JD, Barron B, Pea R, Meltzoff A, Kuhl P, et al. Foundations and opportunities for an interdisciplinary science of learning. In: Sawyer K, ed. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006, 19-34.
31. Gardner H. TheMind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution(Revised Edition). New York: Basic Books; 1990.
32. Burkhardt H, Schoenfeld AH. Improving educational research: toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educ Researcher 2003, 32:3-14.
33. Strauss S. Cognitive development and science education: toward a middle level model. In: Sigel I, Renninger KA, eds. Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 4. Child Psychology in Practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1998, 357-400.
34. Kelly E, Lesh R. Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. In: Kelly AE, Lesh R, eds. Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kleuwer Academic Press; 2000, 35-44.
35. Koedinger KR, Anderson JR, Hadley WH, Mark M. Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. Int J Artificial Intell Educ 1997, 8:30-43.
36. French A, Nathan MJ. Under the microscope of research and into the classroom: reflections on early algebra learning and instruction. In: Masingila JO, ed. Teachers Engaged in Research. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing; 2006, 49-68.
37. Rose M. TheMind atWork.New York: Viking; 2004.
38. Stokes DE. Pasteur's Quadrant. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1997.
39. Brown AL. Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. J Lear Sci 1992, 2:141-178.
40. Siegler RS. Three aspects of cognitive development. Cognit Psychol 1976, 8:481-520.
41. Donovan MS, Bransford JD. How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005.
42. Pashler H, Bain PM, Bottge BA, Graesser A, Koedinger K, et al. Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning. IES Practice Guide. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research; 2007.
43. MillerML. A structured planning and debugging environment for elementary programming. In: Sleeman D, Brown JS, eds. Intelligent Tutoring Systems. New York: Academic Press; 1982.
44. Anderson JR. Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1993.
45. Polson M, Richardson J. Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.
46. Anderson JR, Conrad FG, Corbett AT. Skill acquisition and the LISP Tutor. Cogn Sci 1989, 13:467-506.
47. Linn MC, Lee H-S, Tinker R,Husic F, Chiu JL. Teaching and assessing knowledge integration in science. Science 2006, 313:1049-1050.
48. Ohlsson S. Cognitive Science and instruction: why the revolution is not here (yet). Learn Instruction 1990, 2:561-600.
49. Regian JW, Shute VJ. Cognitive approaches to automated instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1992.
50. Nathan MJ. The impact of theories of learning on learning environment design. Interactive Learn Environments 1998, 5:135-160.
51. Glaser R. Components of a psychology of instruction: toward a science of design. Rev Educ Res 1976, 46:1-24.
52. Schwartz DL, Martin T, Nasir N. Designs for knowledge evolution: towards a prescriptive theory for integrating first- and second-hand knowledge. In: Gardenfors P, Johansson P, eds. Cognition, Education, and Communication Technology. Mahwah,NJ: Erlbaum; 2005, 21-54.
53. Clark RC, Mayer RE. e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003.
54. Graesser AC, Person N, Harter D. Tutoring Research Group Teaching tactics and dialog in AutoTutor. Int J Artificial Intell Educ 2001, 12:257-279.
55. Sweller J, van Merrienboer JJG, Paas FGWC. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ Psychol Rev 1998, 10:251-296.
56. Glennan TK, Bodilly S, Galegher J, Kerr KA. Expanding the Reach of Education Reforms: Perspectives from Leaders in the Scale-up of Educational Interventions. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. 2004. Retrieved February 14, 2009, from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2004/ RAND MG248.pdf.
57. Stevenson HW, Stigler JW. The Learning Gap: Why Our Schools Are Failing and What We Can Learn from Japanese and Chinese Education. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1994.
58. Spillane JP. Cognition and policy implementation: District policymakers and the reform of mathematics education. Cogn Instruction 2000, 18:141-179.
59. Hall R. Schedules of practical work for the analysis of case studies of learning and development. J Lear Sci 2001, 10:203-222.
60. Carpenter TP, Fennema E, Peterson PL, Chiang P, Loef M. Using knowledge of children's mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: an experimental study. Am Educ Res J 1989, 26:499-531.
61. Villasenor A Jr, Kepner HS Jr. Arithmetic from a problem-solving perspective: an urban implementation. J Res Math Educ 1993, 24:62-69.
62. Romberg TA, Carpenter TC, Dremock F. Understanding Math and Science Matters. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2005.
63. Gamoran A, Anderson CW, Quiroz PA, Secada WG, Williams T, et al. Transforming Teaching in Math and Science: How Schools and Districts Can Support Change. New York: Teachers College Press; 2003.
64. Connor CM, Morrison FJ, Fishman BJ, Schatschneider C, Underwood P. Algorithm-guided reading instruction. Science 2007, 315:464-465.
65. Cobb P, diSessa A, Lehrer R, Schauble L. Design experiments in educational research. Educ Researcher 2003, 32:9-13.
66. Collins A. Towards a design science of education. In: Scanlon E, O'Shea T, eds. New Directions in Educational Technology. Berlin: Springer; 1992, 15-22.
67. Design-Based Research Collective. Design-based research: an emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educ Researcher 2003, 32:5-8.
68. Sandoval WA, Bell P. Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: introduction. Educational Psychologist 2004, 39:199-201.
69. Koedinger KR. Toward evidence for instructional design principles: Examples from Cognitive Tutor Math 6. In: Mewborn D, Sztajn P, White D, Wiegel H, Bryant R, Nooney K, eds. Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education; 2002.
70. Barab SA, Kirshner D. Guest editors' introduction: rethinking methodology in the Learning Sciences. J Lear Sci 2001, 10:5-15.
71. Lesh R, Lehrer R. Iterative refinement cycles for videotape analyses of conceptual change. In: Kelly A, Lesh R, eds. Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kleuwer Academic Press; 2000, 665-708.
72. Lesh R, Kelly A. Multi-tiered teaching experiments. In: Kelly AE, Lesh R, eds. Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. Mahwah,NJ: Erlbaum; 2000, 197-205.
73. Cobb P. Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In: Kelly AE, Lesh R, eds. Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2000, 307-333.
74. Gibson JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 1979.
75. Norman D. The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books; 1988.
76. Glenberg A. What memory is for: creating meaning in the service of action. Behav Brain Sci 1997, 20:1-55.
77. Barsalou LW. Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci 1999, 22:577-660.
78. Vygotsky LS. Thought and language. (A Kozulin (Trans.)). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1986.
79. Latour B. On interobjectivity. Mind Culture Activity 1996, 3:228-245.
80. Schwartz D. The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. J Lear Sci 1995, 4:321-354.
81. Greeno JG. Positioning, problematizing, and reconciling: aspects of productive cognition and learning in a situative perspective. In: Koschmann T, ed. Theorizing Learning Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2005.
82. Nathan MJ, Eilam B, Kim Suyeon. To disagree, we must also agree: How intersubjectivity structures and perpetuates discourse in a mathematics classroom. J Lear Sci 2007, 16:525-565.
83. Roschelle J. Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. J Lear Sci 1992, 2:235-276.
84. Tomasello M, Carpenter M. Shared intentionality. Dev Sci 2007, 10:121-125.
85. Gutiérrez K, Rogoff B. Cultural ways of learning: individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educ Researcher 2003, 32:19-25.
86. Glenberg A, de Vega M, Graesser AC. Framing the debate. In: de Vega M, Glenberg A, Graesser AC, eds. Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2008, 1-10.
87. Wilson M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 2006, 9:625-636.
88. Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors We Live. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1980/2003.
89. LakoffG,Núñez R. WhereMathematicsComes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics Into Being. New York: Basic Books; 2001.
90. Abrahamson D. Embodied spatial articulation: a gesture perspective on student negotiation between kinesthetic schemas and epistemic forms in learning mathematics. In: McDougall DE, Ross JA, eds. Proceedings of the Twenty Sixth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol 2. Toronto, Ontario: Preney; 2004, 791-797.
91. Alibali MW, Nathan MJ. Teachers' gestures as a means of scaffolding students' understanding: evidence from an early algebra lesson. In: Goldman R, Pea R, Barron BJ, Derry S, eds. Video Research in the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2007, 349-365.
92. Clement JJ. The role of imagistic simulation in scientific thought experiments. Topics Cogn Sci 2009, 1:686-710.
93. Glenberg AM, Gutierrez T, Levin JR, Japuntich S, Kaschak MP. Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children's reading comprehension. J Educ Psychol 2004, 96:424-436.
94. Hostetter AB, Alibali MW. Visible embodiment: gestures as simulated action. Psychon Bull Rev 2008, 15:495-514.
95. Schwartz DL, Black T. Inferences through imagined actions: knowing by simulated doing. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1999, 25:116-136.
96. Glenberg AM, Robertson DA. Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Process 1999, 28:1-26.
97. Collins A, Brown JS, Newman S. Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In: Resnick LB, ed. Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1989, 453-494.
98. Resnick LB. Learning in school and out. Educ Researcher 1987, 16:13-20.
99. Hall R, Stevens R. Teaching/learning events in the workplace: a comparative analysis of their organizational and interactional structure. In: Cottrell GW, ed. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1996, 160-165.
100. Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid S. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Researcher 1989, 18:32-42.
101. Scribner S, Cole M. The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1981.
102. Clancey WJ. Situated action: a neuropsychological interpretation response to Vera and Simon. Cogn Sci 1993, 17:87-116.
103. Cole M, Engestrom Y. A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In: Salomon G, ed. Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993, 1-46.
104. Heath SB. Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1983.
105. Anderson JR, Greeno JG, Reder LM, Simon HA. Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educ Researcher 2000, 29:11-13.
106. Stahl G, Koschmann T, Suthers D. Computersupported collaborative learning: an historical perspective. In: Sawyer RK, ed. Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006, 409-426.
107. Newell A. Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1990.
108. Lemke JL. Across the scales of time: artifacts, activities, and meanings in Ecosocial Systems. Mind Culture Activity 2000, 7:273-290.
109. Lemke JL. The long and the short of it: comments on multiple time-scale studies of human activity. J Learn Sci 2001, 10:17-26.
110. Ritter S, Anderson JR, Koedinger KR, Corbett A. Cognitive Tutor: applied research in mathematics education. Psychon Bull Rev 2007, 14:249-255.
111. Koedinger KR, Anderson JR. Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: elements of expertise in geometry. Cogn Sci 1990, 14:511-550.
112. Koedinger KR, Alibali M, Nathan MJ. Trade-offs between grounded and abstract representations: evidence from algebra problem solving. Cogn Sci 2008, 32:366-397.
113. Koedinger KR, Nathan MJ. The real story behind story problems: effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. J Lear Sci 2004, 13:129-164.
114. Anderson JR, Corbett AT, Koedinger K, Pelletier R. Cognitive tutors: lessons learned. J Learn Sci 1995, 4:167-207.
115. Koedinger KR, Aleven V. Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with Cognitive Tutors. Educ Psychol Rev 2007, 19:239-264.
116. Schofield JW, Eurich-Fulcer R, Britt CL. Teachers, computer tutors, and teaching: the artificially intelligent tutor as an agent for classroom change. Am Educ Res J 1994, 31:579-607.
117. Gluck KA. Eye movements and algebra tutoring. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University. 1999.
118. Anderson JR, Gluck K. What role do cognitive architectures play in intelligent tutoring systems? In: Klahr D, Carver SM, eds. Cognition and Instruction: Twenty-five Years of Progress. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2001, 227-262.
119. Anderson JR, Betts SA, Ferris JL, & Fincham JM. Can neural imaging investigate learning in an educational task? In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, June 2-3, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University. 2009.
120. Anderson JR. How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe?: Oxford University Press; 2007.
121. Nasir N. Points ain't everything: emergent goals and average and percent understandings in the play of basketball among African-American students. Anthropol Educ Q 2000b, 31:283-305.
122. Nasir N. Average and percent on the court: Statistics learning in basketball. Manuscript submitted for publication. 2001.
123. Reisman S. Dominoes: a computer simulation of cognitive processes. Simulation Games 1972, 3:155-164.
124. Nasir N. Identity, goals, and learning: mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking Learn 2002, 4:211-245.
125. Ogbu J. Understanding cultural diversity and learning. Educ Researcher 1992, 21:5-14.
126. Nasir NS, Saxe GB. Ethnic and academic identities: a cultural practice perspective on emerging tensions and their management in the lives of minority students. Educ Researcher 2003, 32:14-18.
127. Lynham SA. The general method of theory-building research in applied disciplines. Adv Developing Human Resources 2002, 4:221-241.
128. Bruer JT. Schools for Thought: A Science of Learning in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1993.
129. Carver SM, Klahr D, eds. Cognition and Instruction: 25 Years of Progress. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2001.
130. McGilly K. Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1994.
131. Klahr D, Chen Z, Toth EE. Cognitive development and science education: ships passing in the night or beacons of mutual illumination? In: Carver SM, Klahr D, eds. Cognition and Instruction: 25 years of progress. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2001.
132. Bruner JS. Toward a Theory of Instruction. New York: Norton; 1968.
133. Schofield et al
134. Glenburg A, Kaschak M. Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bull Rev 2002, 9:558-565.
135. González N, Moll L, Amanti C. Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing Practices in Households, Communities, and Classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2005.
136. Rogoff B. 2003. The Cultural Nature of Human Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
137. Bransford JD, Brown AB, Cocking R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Expanded Edition). Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
138. Donovan MS, Bransford JD, Pellegrino JW. How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1999.
139. Kelly AE, Lesh R., eds. Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2000.
140. Resnick L. Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1989.
141. Sawyer K. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006.