Silent letters are activated in spoken word recognition

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 236-261

  Ranbom, Larissa J ^a   Connine, Cynthia M ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Orthographic influence in speech perception; Spoken word recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; PERCEPTION; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SPELLING; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 78751691305     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2010.486578     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. CELEX English database (1993). Available: Nijmegen: Centre for Lexical Information [Producer and Distributor].
2. Chéreau, C., Gaskell, M. G., & Dumay, N. (2007). Reading spoken words: Orthographic effects in auditory priming. Cognition, 102, 341-360.
3. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
4. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). The DRC model: A model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-258.
5. Connine, C. M. (2004). It's not what you hear, but how often you hear it: On the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1084-1089.
6. Connine, C.M., & Pinnow, E. (2006). Phonological variation in spoken word recognition: Episodes and abstractions. The Linguistic Review, 23, 235-245.
7. Connine, C. M., Ranbom, L., & Patterson, D. J. (2008). On the representation of phonological variant frequency in spoken word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 403-411.
8. Connine, C. M., Titone, D., Deelman, T., & Blasko, D. (1997). Similarity mapping in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 462-480.
9. Deelman, T., & Connine, C. M. (2001). Missing information in spoken word recognition: Nonreleased stop consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 656-663.
10. Dijkstra, T., Roelofs, A., & Fieuws, S. (1995). Orthographic effects on phoneme monitoring. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 264-271.
11. Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
12. Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1166-1183.
13. Goswami, U. (2000). Phonological representations, reading development and dyslexia: Towards a cross-linguistic theoretical framework. Dyslexia, 6, 133-151.
14. Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1996). Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 623-647.
15. Grainger, J., Kang, M. N. V., & Segui, J. (2001). Cross-modal repetition priming of heterographic homophones. Memory and Cognition, 29, 53-61.
16. Hallé, P. A., Chereau, C., & Segui, J. (2000). Where is the /b/ in "absurde" [apsyrd]? It is in French listeners' minds. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 618-639.
17. Inhoff, A. W., Connine, C., & Radach, R. (2002). A contingent speech technique in eye movement research on reading. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments Computers, 34, 471-480.
18. Jared, D., Levy, B. A., & Rayner, K. (1999). The role of phonology in activation of word meanings during reading: Evidence from proofreading and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 219-264.
19. Johnson, K. (2004). Massive reduction in conversational American English. In K. Yoneyama & K. Maekawa (Eds.), Spontaneous speech: Data and analysis. Proceedings of the 1st session of the 10th international symposium (pp. 29-54). Tokyo, Japan: The National International Institute for Japanese Language.
20. Kiyonaga, K., Grainger, J., Midgley, K. J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2007). Masked cross-modal repetition priming: An event-related potential investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 337-376.
21. Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A. (1993). Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 19, 285-294.
22. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994a). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
23. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994b). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from associative priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331-353.
24. Metsala, J. L., & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89-120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Muneaux, M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2004). Locus of orthographic effects in spoken word recognition: Novel insights from the neighbour generation task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 641-660.
26. Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52(3), 189-234.
27. Pattamadilok, C., Kolinsky, R., Luksaneeyanawin, S., & Morais, J. (2008). Orthographic congruency effects in the suprasegmental domain: Evidence from Thai. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 1515-1537.
28. Pattamadilok, C., Kolinsky, R., Ventura, P., Radeau, M., & Morais, J. (2007). Orthographic representations in spoken word priming: No early automatic activation. Language & Speech, 50, 505-531.
29. Pattamadilok, C., Perre, L., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. (2009). On-line orthographic influences on spoken language in a semantic task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 169-179.
30. Patterson, D., & Connine, C. M. (2001). Variant frequency in flap production: A corpus analysis of variant frequency in American English flap production. Phonetica, 58, 254-275.
31. Peere, L., Pattamadilok, C., Montant, M., & Ziegler, J. (2009). Orthographic effects in spoken language: On-line activation or phonological restructuring? Brain Research, 1275, 73-80.
32. Peereman, R., Dufour, S., & Burt, J. (2009). Orthographic influences in spoken-word recognition: The consistency effect in semantic and gender-categorization tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 363-368.
33. Ranbom, L. J., & Connine, C. M. (2005, November). Orthographic influence in phonological variant recognition. Poster presented at the Psychonomic Society, Toronto, ON, Canada.
34. Ranbom, L. J., & Connine, C. M. (2007). Lexical representation of phonological variation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 273-298.
35. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: Twenty years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
36. Seidenberg, M. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 546-554.
37. Slowiaczek, L. M., Soltano, E. G., Wieting, S. J., & Bishop, K. L. (2003). An investigation of phonology and orthography in spoken-word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 233-262.
38. Sumner, M., & Samuel, A. G. (2005). Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final /t/. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 322-328.
39. Taft, M. (2006). Orthographically influenced abstract phonological representation: Evidence from non-rhotic speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(1), 67-78.
40. Taft, M., Castles, A., Davis, C., Lazendic, G., & Nguyen-Hoan, M. (2007). Automatic activation of orthography in spoken word recognition: Pseudohomograph priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 366-379.
41. Taft, M., & Hambly, G. (1985). The influence of orthography on phonological representations in the lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 320-355.
42. Tanenhaus, M. K., Flanigan, H. P., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1980). Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 8, 513-520.
43. Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C., & Hale, B. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 14, 371-386.
44. Ventura, P., Morais, J., Pattamadilok, C., & Kolinsky, R. (2004). The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 57-95.
45. Wilson, M. D. (1988). The MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine readable dictionary, version 2. Behavioural Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 20, 6-11.
46. Ziegler, J. C., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 683-689.
47. Ziegler, J. C., Ferrand, L., & Montant, M. (2004). Visual phonology: The effects of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks. Memory and Cognition, 32, 732-741.
48. Ziegler, J. C., Muneaux, M., & Grainger, J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 779-793.