Orthographically influenced abstract phonological representation: Evidence from non-rhotic speakers

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 67-78

  Taft, Marcus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Abstract phonology; Lexical representation; Orthography; Phonological representation; Pseudohomphone judgement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; SPEECH;

CULTURE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PHONETICS; SPEECH; VOCABULARY;

EID: 33746924893     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-005-9004-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Archangeli, D. (1997). Optimality Theory. Malden: Mass. Blackwell.
2. Birch, S., Pollatsek, A., & Kingston, J. (1998). The nature of the sound codes accessed by visual language. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 70-93.
3. Castro-Caldas, A., & Reis, A. (2003). The knowledge of orthography is a revolution in the brain. Reading and Writing, 16, 81-97.
4. Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). The American Heritage Word Frequency Book. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
5. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
6. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A Dual Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
7. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
8. Hallé, P. A., Chéreau, C., & Segui, J. (2000). Where is the /b/ in "absurde" [apsyrd]? It is in French listeners' minds. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 618-639.
9. Lukatela, G., Lukatela, K., & Turvey, M. T. (1993). Further evidence for phonological constraints on visual lexical access: TOWED primes FROG. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 461-466.
10. Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise simultaneously? Cognition, 7, 323-331.
11. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
12. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
13. Slowiaczek, L. M., Soltano, E. G., Wieting, S. J., & Bishop, K. L. (2003). An investigation of phonology and orthography in spoken-word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 233-262.
14. Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
15. Taft, M. (1984). Evidence for an abstract lexical representation of word structure. Memory and Cognition, 12, 264-269.
16. Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 57A, 745-765.
17. Taft, M., & Hambly, G. (1985). The influence of orthography on phonological representations in the lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 320-335.
18. Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
19. Ziegler, J. C., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 683-689.
20. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1131-1161.